Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG
Question time.
Let's say for the sake of argument that the bulk of GZ's story is true:
- he followed him because he thought he was suspicious for whatever reason
- he lost track of him visually so he got out of the car to confirm the address
- TM did somehow circle back and confront him
- a physical altercation ensued (let's ignore who specifically initiated the physical aspect for a moment)
- TM was kicking his ass
So the question is, given all of these speculative "facts", how does this change or not change anyone's opinion?
|
Well, knowing that GZ's story is valid would give his account of the events a credibility he would have not otherwise earned.
Ultimately though, it doesn't really change the case at all. GZ's story could be 100% accurate, and the self defense case is still incredibly weak. Even given the above, he's not in life threatening danger. He is the victim of battery.
I don't know if Zimmerman shot Martin with the intent to kill, but if that was his way of protecting himself, it's the equivalent of detonating a nuclear missile to protect oneself from a gunman. Effective, but with serious consequences. Until acquittal.