Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin
Even though I recognize you believe it did not happen to that way, explain how the factual scenario I set forth in post 1016 could not be true by using only direct evidence or inferences consistent with those in the post.
|
We can speculate about different scenarios including the possibility that Zimmerman had his weapon drawn from the get go and the struggled for the gun ensued while he was attempting to pistol-whip Martin. That fact of the case are pretty simple and it's a matter of using your common sense.
- Profiled Martin as one of those "****ing punks. Those assholes, they always get away"
- Pursued Martin
- Violate community protocol
- Get out of car after Martin allegedly circled his car
- Inconstant statements about what happened
- Inconsistent statements about why got out of his car
- He didn't identify himself as neighborhood watchman
- Shoots and kills Martin during a struggle that was avoidable
- Goes on national TV and says "This is all god's plan and I wouldn't do anything differently (blatant disregard for human life).
Anything is possible in this world but we have to rely on the facts of the case and the fact of the case are sufficient enough to convict Zimmerman of manslaughter (at a minimum), The burden of proof has been met by the state and nothing in the defense persuasive enough to arrive at an alternative verdict. It is that simple.