Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

JoeRedskin · 07-03-2013, 08:19 PM

And on cross exam, the DNA expert indicated that (1) b/c it had been raining, that could affect the ability to collect DNA and (2) he could neither identify nor exclude the existence of Martin's DNA in the specific areas identified; and (3) he did not collect the DNA and could not verify how it was specifically collected.

Big difference from asserting that Martin's DNA could be conclusively excluded. Cross did what a good cross does, exposed the flaws in the methodology and conclusiveness.

07-03-2013, 08:19 PM	#774
JoeRedskin Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 62 Posts: 10,401	Re: Trayvon Martin Case And on cross exam, the DNA expert indicated that (1) b/c it had been raining, that could affect the ability to collect DNA and (2) he could neither identify nor exclude the existence of Martin's DNA in the specific areas identified; and (3) he did not collect the DNA and could not verify how it was specifically collected. Big difference from asserting that Martin's DNA could be conclusively excluded. Cross did what a good cross does, exposed the flaws in the methodology and conclusiveness. __________________ Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.