![]() |
Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
They announce the Pro Bowl squad in 30 minutes on NFLN. I think at least three Redskins will make it.
1) [B]London Fletcher[/B]. Leads the NFL in tackles. No brainer. 2) [B]Ryan Kerrigan[/B]. First team alternate 3) [B]Adam Carriker[/B]. Maybe first or second team alternate **************************************************** Sav Rocca has been awesome, but there are a few NFC punters that have had really good seasons. Quiet as kept, Gano's a keeper. Won't make it this time, but I could see him making it in the very near future. Kid has a leg. |
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
No players voted for Fletch, or any Redskins, which could hurt him
|
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
Lorenzo Alexander for ST.
|
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
Scratch this thread. No Skins made it.
Fail |
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
Yep, I'm sure they will add one or two due to injury. Does Carlos Rogers count :)
|
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
Carlos Rogers and Andre Carter Pro Bowl starters. Ha!
|
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
John Beck not in the Pro Bowl? HE WAS ROBBED.
|
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
[url=http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7394336/aaron-rodgers-green-bay-packers-tom-brady-new-england-patriots-headline-pro-bowl-rosters]Aaron Rodgers of Green Bay Packers, Tom Brady of New England Patriots headline Pro Bowl rosters - ESPN[/url]
This is why the Pro-Bowl doesn't mean shit. [quote]If Brady does withdraw, for any reason, he could end up being replaced by none other than Tim Tebow. A team source told The Dever Post that the Denver Broncos quarterback was chosen as a second alternate for the AFC, meaning if two quarterbacks from the conference decline to attend the game Tebow will be added to the roster. [/quote] Tebow? Really? |
How the **** did 59 not make it again? Wow
|
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
[quote=12thMan;870591][B]Carlos Rogers[/B] and Andre Carter Pro Bowl starters. Ha![/quote]
told mutherf*ckers Los be ballin London the ultimate snub yet again |
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
It is incredible that Fletcher didn't make it, although if the Redskins record were better, hard to imagine he wouldn't even if he had no more tackles (or, indeed, even fewer).
But what I find perhaps equally disturbing is that there are three former Redskins on the roster and no current Redskins ([url=http://www.nfl.com/probowl/story/09000d5d82578253/article/2012-pro-bowl-rosters]NFL.com news: 2012 Pro Bowl rosters[/url]). Doesn't say a lot about how we're handling personnel, even with the big caveat that the Pro Bowl is a somewhat silly popularity contest. |
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
It's tempting to start a new thread entitled, "Screw the Pro Bowl, You're the Man, London Fletcher." Seriously, the guy plays every down like it is his last, and has been a model of consistency, not to mention a model citizen.
|
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
[quote=Chico23231;870595]told mutherf*ckers Los be ballin
London the ultimate snub yet again[/quote] Rogers leaves Redskins and all of a sudden he has glue hands! |
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
[quote=SmootSmack;870586]No players voted for Fletch, or any Redskins, which could hurt him[/quote]
Is this a case of union brothers not voting for London because he plays too hard? Seriously! |
Re: Redskins Pro Bowl Thread
[quote=calia;870598]It's tempting to start a new thread entitled, "Screw the Pro Bowl, You're the Man, London Fletcher." Seriously, the guy plays every down like it is his last, and has been a model of consistency, not to mention a model citizen.[/quote]
Against my better judgement and after a few cocktails, do it. **** the Pro Bowl. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.