jpeg signatures
 

Are we not allowed to have them or am I just doing it wrong?

This is the one I want to use.

[IMG]http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f237/redstout/brunell.jpg[/IMG]

Re: jpeg signatures
 

I think they are verboten.

Re: jpeg signatures
 

I personally think it clutters things up too much. Ever seen extreme skins threads? Makes my eyes hurt.

Re: jpeg signatures
 

[quote=GMScud;808363]I personally think it clutters things up too much. Ever seen extreme skins threads? Makes my eyes hurt.[/quote]

This.

Re: jpeg signatures
 

You would basically get stuff like this which is funny the first time but gets annoying the 10th or 11 thousandth time you see it.
[IMG]http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/photos/images/original/000/100/312/bwUar2.gif?1297896064[/IMG]

Re: jpeg signatures
 

No. No.No. A thousand times no. image sigs crap up a board big time.

Re: jpeg signatures
 

I didn't even know what one was until I read this thread.

Re: jpeg signatures
 

[quote=firstdown;808529]I didn't even know what one was until I read this thread.[/quote]


That is shocking.

Re: jpeg signatures
 

[quote=FRPLG;808393]No. No.No. A thousand times no. image sigs crap up a board big time.[/quote]

Agreed. I hate them.

Besides, you know half of them will end up being Ron Paul sigs, just like most other message boards. :D

Re: jpeg signatures
 

yeah they are really annoying. Not like I would be able to see them since I have scripts disabled any everything, so my browser view of this forum is vastly different than most peoples anyways.

Re: jpeg signatures
 

[quote=hooskins;808910]yeah they are really annoying. Not like I would be able to see them since I have scripts disabled any everything, so my browser view of this forum is vastly different than most peoples anyways.[/quote]

Like the MS-DOS look, do ya?

Re: jpeg signatures
 

Oh yeah. Clean simple and work friendly!