Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Fred Davis Tagged (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=46831)

81forHOF 03-02-2012 02:46 PM

Fred Davis Tagged
 
NFL.com reports Davis, not Landry, received the franchise tag.

I think it's a good move considering Landry's heel issues. A dominant TE seems to be a must these days.

skinsfaninok 03-02-2012 02:50 PM

Good

diehardskin2982 03-02-2012 03:01 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
He will be needed for our next starting QB, who ever that may be.

mbedner3420 03-02-2012 03:05 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
PFT: Franchise tag for Fred Davis isn't a done deal, yet.

SBXVII 03-02-2012 03:08 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=81forHOF;891156]NFL.com reports Davis, not Landry, received the franchise tag.

I think it's a good move considering Landry's heel issues. A dominant TE seems to be a must these days.[/quote]

I didn't think Landry was a question for being tagged? If anything he's more of a risk for being a candidate to be released due to his lack of wanting to have surgery. As much as I like him and his size I'm just not understanding him not getting it done prior to last yr and not having it this yr after he saw how it made his bad play look worse.

81forHOF 03-02-2012 03:21 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=SBXVII;891174]I didn't think Landry was a question for being tagged? If anything he's more of a risk for being a candidate to be released due to his lack of wanting to have surgery. As much as I like him and his size I'm just not understanding him not getting it done prior to last yr and not having it this yr after he saw how it made his bad play look worse.[/quote]
I agree but I believe the popular thinking was that the franchise $ amount for a safety was fairly low (compared to other positions) so the skins could lock him up for another year without too much of a commitment.

Dirtbag59 03-02-2012 03:43 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
Boring title is boring. What about something with PIZAZ!!!! "TAG YOUR IT: THE TALE OF HOW THE UNWANTED SECOND ROUND TIGHT END BECAME A FRANCHISE PLAYER!"

SmootSmack 03-02-2012 03:46 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Dirtbag59;891187]Boring title is boring. What about something with PIZAZ!!!! "TAG YOUR IT: THE TALE OF HOW THE UNWANTED SECOND ROUND TIGHT END BECAME A FRANCHISE PLAYER!"[/quote]

"Redskins High on Davis: Keep Him In the Joint"

Ruhskins 03-02-2012 03:49 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=SmootSmack;891195]"Redskins High on Davis: Keep Him In the Joint"[/quote]

:lol:

See this is what happens when newbs begin a thread. LOL.

The Goat 03-02-2012 03:57 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=SmootSmack;891195]"Redskins High on Davis: Keep Him In the Joint"[/quote]

That's funny! But also not so funny...hope he gets his sh!t together.

NYCskinfan82 03-02-2012 03:59 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=SmootSmack;891195]"Redskins High on Davis: Keep Him In the Joint"[/quote]

That's a good one.:rofl:

Chico23231 03-02-2012 04:04 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
To be blunt, im just glad the smoke has cleared and Davis is a Skin. We need not bogart cash, give him a pound of it and have the papers signed by 4/20.

81forHOF 03-02-2012 04:05 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Ruhskins;891198]:lol:

See this is what happens when newbs begin a thread. LOL.[/quote]


Been here 3 years longer than you, son. Just a man of few words.

itvnetop 03-02-2012 04:13 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=SmootSmack;891195]"Redskins High on Davis: Keep Him In the Joint"[/quote]

Well played.

CultBrennan59 03-02-2012 04:15 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
Thank god that we kept the better player of the two Davis (over Landry).


But still, priority #1

RESIGN LONDON FLETCHER!!!

Ruhskins 03-02-2012 04:21 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=81forHOF;891218]Been here 3 years longer than you, [B]son[/B]. Just a man of few words.[/quote]

Didn't know that being 6 years older than someone allow you to call them son.

CRedskinsRule 03-02-2012 04:28 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=mbedner3420;891171]PFT: Franchise tag for Fred Davis isn't a done deal, yet.[/quote]

That's not a big deal, he just missed his alarm ;)

Ruhskins 03-02-2012 04:30 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=CRedskinsRule;891232]That's not a big deal, he just missed his alarm ;)[/quote]

He wanted part of the franchise tag payment to be paid in Hershey bars.

NYCskinfan82 03-02-2012 04:32 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Ruhskins;891233]He wanted part of the franchise tag payment to be paid in Hershey bars.[/quote]

Why, cause he's got the munchies.

Lotus 03-02-2012 04:52 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Chico23231;891216]To be blunt, im just glad the smoke has cleared and Davis is a Skin. We need not bogart cash, give him a pound of it and have the papers signed by 4/20.[/quote]

Very clever! Some people could not have strung that together. I've learned something about you. :)

REDSKINS4ever 03-02-2012 05:03 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
Excellent news. I was thinking between LaRon Landry and Fred Davis, which one of them was more worthy of the franchise tag? Davis, a weed head en route to kicking the habit, or Landry, a often injured player who has shown no sign that he will heal from his injury anytime soon? Since Davis has been more productive and meant more to the team in terms of playing time, consistency, and overall production, I feel he was worthier of the tag.

mooby 03-02-2012 05:32 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Chico23231;891216]To be blunt, im just glad the smoke has cleared and Davis is a Skin. We need not bogart cash, give him a pound of it and have the papers signed by 4/20.[/quote]

Excellent. Well done.

Alvin Walton 03-02-2012 06:16 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Ruhskins;891231]Didn't know that being 6 years older than someone allow you to call them son.[/quote]

Oh....you got sonned.
:benched:

los panda 03-02-2012 07:05 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
damn homie
in high school you was the man homie

SkinzWin 03-02-2012 07:10 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Ruhskins;891233]He wanted part of the franchise tag payment to be paid in Hershey bars.[/quote]

At least it's not in skittles...

Defensewins 03-03-2012 12:28 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
Davis can now build the greenhouse addition to the new practice bubble.

Ruhskins 03-03-2012 12:31 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Defensewins;891375]Davis can now build the greenhouse addition to the new practice bubble.[/quote]

:lol:

artmonkforhallofamein07 03-03-2012 12:33 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
What is the tag on a TE? 5.5 mil a year or more?

81forHOF 03-03-2012 12:52 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Alvin Walton;891279]Oh....you got sonned.
:benched:[/quote]

Nice. lol. I'd like to apologize for having to show that ugly side of myself.

Ruhskins 03-03-2012 12:55 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=81forHOF;891385]Nice. lol. I'd like to apologize for having to show that ugly side of myself.[/quote]

No need to apologize son. LOL.

NYCskinfan82 03-03-2012 05:00 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=defensewins;891375]davis can now build the greenhouse addition to the new practice bubble.[/quote]

haha :)

skinsfaninok 03-03-2012 06:23 AM

[QUOTE=artmonkforhallofamein07;891377]What is the tag on a TE? 5.5 mil a year or more?[/QUOTE]

Whatever the avg salary is for the top paid tes

81forHOF 03-03-2012 10:14 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
The franchise amount for TE's is 5.4 million - down from last year's 7.3 mil. The new CBA lowered tag amounts. They are now computed using a % of overall cap figure for the last 5 seasons (for that position) as opposed to an average of individual salaries.

TE was the lowest position to tag. Landry would have cost 6.3 mil this season (2nd lowest) so I think this was a good move now even more than before.

BaltimoreSkins 03-04-2012 01:34 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=Defensewins;891375]Davis can now build the greenhouse addition to the new practice bubble.[/quote]

Complete with a hydroponics chamber

los panda 03-04-2012 03:57 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
i like this a lot. i hope he proves/redeems himself this season and can sign a long term deal afterwards

firstdown 03-06-2012 09:51 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
I have a question. Didn't we still have time to sign him before using the FT or was there a deadline. I thought it just had to be used before teams were free to sign free agents.

Ruhskins 03-06-2012 10:07 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=firstdown;892536]I have a question. Didn't we still have time to sign him before using the FT or was there a deadline. I thought it just had to be used before teams were free to sign free agents.[/quote]

Good question. I am curious as to why free agency doesn't start right after the franchise tag deadline.

mooby 03-06-2012 10:10 AM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
[quote=firstdown;892536]I have a question. Didn't we still have time to sign him before using the FT or was there a deadline. I thought it just had to be used before teams were free to sign free agents.[/quote]

No, the deadline to use the tag was yesterday at 4 pm. As Ruh said, I don't understand why they have that waiting period between the tag deadline and FA, but again I have extremely limited knowledge on those matters so I don't have much of an opinion on the subject.

los panda 03-06-2012 02:12 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
did we want to sign him anyways? i thought the plan was to give him one year of probation with the tag to see if he acts right

NYCskinfan82 03-06-2012 03:21 PM

Re: Fred Davis Tagged
 
to tag FD is not alot, one year tag make sure he's got his SH*T together then sign him to a $$$ contract.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.80363 seconds with 9 queries