Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

C'mon Philly! You guys are already so loaded at D-line! Now we lose a guy I wanted to a division rival. Dammit.

They just reported it on NFL Live. Can't find a link yet....

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

JLC said he had no indication we were interested in Scott. The staff must feel good about our DTs.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=freddyg12;306780]JLC said he had no indication we were interested in Scott. The staff must feel good about our DTs.[/quote]

I never said the Skins wanted him, I said I wanted him. He's young and has a great motor, and I thought he would have added good depth behind oft injured Griffin and Salave'a. Plus he goes to a division rival who is already loaded up at D-line.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=GMScud;306793]I never said the Skins wanted him, I said I wanted him. He's young and has a great motor, and I thought he would have added good depth behind oft injured Griffin and Salave'a. Plus he goes to a division rival who is already loaded up at D-line.[/quote]

I wasn't implying that you said the Skins wanted him, I was just saying that the coaches must really think DT is ok as is, cause Scott would seem a good reasonably priced pickup.

It does suck that the iggles got him.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

I don't get it. There must be something about Scott the Skins coaches didn't like.

Do they really think Joe Salave'a is better than this guy?

I sure hope they're right ...

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=freddyg12;306800]I wasn't implying that you said the Skins wanted him, I was just saying that the coaches must really think DT is ok as is, cause Scott would seem a good reasonably priced pickup.

It does suck that the iggles got him.[/quote]

I know! I'm so envious of their D-line depth

Monte Reagor
Broderick Bunkley
Mike Peterson
Dareen Howard
Trent Cole
Javon Kearse
Jerome McDougle
Sam Rayburn
Darwin Walker
Ian Scott

And that's not even the whole list... Ughh

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

i think darwin walker was traded to the bills in the spikes trade?

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=Big C;306824]i think darwin walker was traded to the bills in the spikes trade?[/quote]

You're right. I must have been looking at an old roster. They did trade Walker to Bills, but they also signed Monte Reagor from Indy...

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

I don't think they will be much on the other side of the ball. Soon as McNONADS breaks a toenail they will be done. F**K PHILLY!

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=Beemnseven;306803]I don't get it. There must be something about Scott the Skins coaches didn't like.

Do they really think Joe Salave'a is better than this guy?

I sure hope they're right ...[/quote]

Salave'a may be behind Golston right now.

If S. Rice is available they better jump. We have to get some pressure off the edge.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=Grim21Reaper;306901]Salave'a may be behind Golston right now.

If S. Rice is available they better jump. We have to get some pressure off the edge.[/quote]
I think Golston is in for a GOOD year. Golston could very well be ahead of Sal.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

PFT.com:

EAGLES SIGN SCOTT

Adam Schefter of NFL Network reports that the Philadelphia Eagles have agreed to terms with former Bears defensive tackle Ian Scott.

Scott, per Schefter, will receive a one-year, $1 million contract.

The four-year veteran started in seven regular-season games in 2006 for the NFC champions and in all postseason contests, including the Super Bowl.

The Bears have also lost defensive tackle Alphonso Boone to free agency. It's suddenly a position of need for the Bears; Tommie Harris missed much of the season with a leg injury, and Tank Johnson currently is in the clink.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=GMScud;306813]I know! I'm so envious of their D-line depth

Monte Reagor
Broderick Bunkley
Mike Peterson
Dareen Howard
Trent Cole
Javon Kearse
Jerome McDougle
Sam Rayburn
Ian Scott

And that's not even the whole list... Ughh[/quote]
not to argue, but who on this list actually scares you? our line was god awful last year, and half of these guys couldn't start on the skins

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=dmek25;306910]not to argue, but who on this list actually scares you? our line was god awful last year, and half of these guys couldn't start on the skins[/quote]

Javon Kearse if healthy is damn good, Trent Cole is a beast- he had 5 sacks his 1st year in the league, 8 sacks last season in his 2nd year, I think he's primed for a monster season. Broderick Bunkley and Mike Patterson are both young first round talents at DT (although neither have done much yet)...

Anyway, I said I was envious of their depth, I didn't say they scared me.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

Link:

[url=http://www.nfl.com/teams/story/PHI/10164583]NFL.com - Philadelphia Eagles Team News[/url]

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

When I first read this thread I thought the Eagles signed the lead singer from Anthrax and then I realized his name is Scott Ian.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=skinsfan_nn;306900]I don't think they will be much on the other side of the ball. Soon as McNONADS breaks a toenail they will be done. F**K PHILLY![/quote]


Uh, I think you are forgetting about #36 overall pick Kevin Kolb (sarcasm)

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[QUOTE=Grim21Reaper;306901]Salave'a may be behind Golston right now.

If S. Rice is available they better jump. We have to get some pressure off the edge.[/QUOTE]

Well signing Rice would certainly fit the Redskins' pattern of getting a DE [I]after[/I] they've already done their best work.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

Please not Simeon Rice. Jevon Kearse if he's healthy & gets cut, but not Rice.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[QUOTE=Beemnseven;306803]I don't get it. There must be something about Scott the Skins coaches didn't like.

Do they really think Joe Salave'a is better than this guy?

I sure hope they're right ...[/QUOTE]

He suprisingly got very little love and attention from all over the league. I still don't know why really. I thought he'd be a higher commodity but he practically had to beg just to get interviews even.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

He was out there for quite a while... there must be some reasons for that.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=Mattyk72;307097]He was out there for quite a while... there must be some reasons for that.[/quote]


people were cheap i guess

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

I don't think we truly need him, and this probably isn't the time to talk about this per se. But I just thought I'd mention that the Eagles have released Ian Scott.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[quote=SmootSmack;400612]I don't think we truly need him, and this probably isn't the time to talk about this per se. But I just thought I'd mention that the Eagles have released Ian Scott.[/quote]

Didn't they release him a while ago? He was a big contributor on that Chicago D last year that was so dominant. I'm surprised he flopped in Philly.

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

He was on IR, but I don't think he was released until today

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

Who needs Ian Scott when we have Monty!

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

Looking back at this thread, some people wanted Rice - he was released by Denver a few weeks back, while I said Kearse if he was cut & healthy. He's been inactive for 6-7 weeks now. Not that we'd want him now, but I wonder if Philly will cut him next?

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

Uh I thought we released Salave'a??

Re: Eagles Sign Ian Scott
 

[QUOTE=GridIron26;400725]Uh I thought we released Salave'a??[/QUOTE]

Check the dates in this thread. ;)