![]() |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
[quote=KI Skins Fan;1331580][I]From the article: "With an increased emphasis on taunting, which was heavily supported by Giants co-owner John Mara, Feliciano’s antics drew a penalty."[/I]
It serves that pain-in-the-neck woke pussy Mara right that his team suffered for his leading the charge to tame the game we love.[/quote] This^ Eagles are gonna clap the Giants bussy this weekend. Can’t wait |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
[quote=Redskins247;1331588]I like the idea of keeping the rules as they are now but with no clock, and the first possession starts at the 50...if they score a TD, the other team gets the ball at the 50...and if they score a TD, then it's sudden death. And you have to go for 2 in OT, no extra points. How many times have we seen when teams got to OT now, aside from Chiefs/Bills...teams cannot score and it's just a puntfest in OT.[/quote]
Yeah but as we all know in the name of "player safety" neither the players union or the league is going to sign off on a no clock OT. |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
LMAO @ "player safety". As if...
Fuck it, just flip a coin. Two out of three gets the W; or nominate one player from each team to play each other in Madden NFL, and they have to use their actual teams. Winner gets the W for their team, and no one gets hurt. HaHa.... |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
Unpopular opinion here, but I'm fine with the OT rules as they are. It's the regular season, if they can't separate themselves after 4 quarters + 10 minutes of football, I'd rather have it be a tie than have them play for ever or it being decided by a coin-toss-like gimmick stuff (I haven't watched 1sec of the soccer world cup, but if I was into this sport I would hate the fact that even in the playoffs a game can be decided by a rock-paper-scissors-like shit (penalty kicks)...)
|
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
The Tie will help us in the long run
|
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
They went to the 10 minute OT and permitting ties for a reason: player safety. It's going to be hard for the NFL to walk back on that one especially if they want to continue pushing towards 18+ game schedules.
The tie is here to stay and as weird as it feels, it's still a pretty rare occurrence. I don't think they need to address it and I certainly don't think they will. |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
The tie will effectively serve as a win against the Giants if we beat them our next game, in regards to having the tiebreaker advantage over them specifically, if we finish w/ the same record.
It could come back to bite us, if we finish tied in the loss column with any other teams. But, it is what it is at this point. Win 3 of 4 (1 being the Giants), and we're pretty much a playoff lock. |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
get bent, mara.
|
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
I think two more wins should get it done, and three more wins would likely lock us into the 2nd wild card spot, 6th seed overall.
|
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1331639]I think two more wins should get it done, and three more wins would likely lock us into the 2nd wild card spot, 6th seed overall.[/quote]
If we win 2, Pack are out even if they win their last 4 If we win 2, Seahawks have to lose 3 of their last 5 (panthers, 9ers, chiefs, jets, rams) if we win 2, NYG have to lose 3 of their last 5 and we both end up 9-7-1 -------- Exciting times ahead |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
[quote=Chico23231;1331285]Letting Giants get 5 sacks, the Oline not doing a good enough job. We left too many plays on the field even after an ok day. The miss TD to Logan is an easy throw.
The defense on the road hold to 20 in ot, good job. Containing Tranny was an issue. Jamin Davis needs a player beside him, getting zero from 2 LB sets. Offseason needs to include Oline and LB[/quote] Wish you guys could have beaten the Giants. |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
[quote=SunnySide;1331644]If we win 2, Pack are out even if they win their last 4
If we win 2, Seahawks have to lose 3 of their last 5 (panthers, 9ers, chiefs, jets, rams) if we win 2, NYG have to lose 3 of their last 5 and we both end up 9-7-1 -------- Exciting times ahead[/quote] That sucks to even read we will be eliminated soon. |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1331592]LMAO @ "player safety". As if...
Fuck it, just flip a coin. Two out of three gets the W; or nominate one player from each team to play each other in Madden NFL, and they have to use their actual teams. Winner gets the W for their team, and no one gets hurt. HaHa....[/quote] My solution: Field goals. If after the ten minute OT, it's still tied, teams take alternating filed goal attempts (22 players on the field, snap and hold, etc.). Start at 45 yards, then 50, then 55, etc. until one team makes it and the other doesn't. If both teams miss the 45, they do it again; a block/missed kick returned for a score ends the game. |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
[quote=Coff;1331737]My solution: Field goals. If after the ten minute OT, it's still tied, teams take alternating filed goal attempts (22 players on the field, snap and hold, etc.). Start at 45 yards, then 50, then 55, etc. until one team makes it and the other doesn't. If both teams miss the 45, they do it again; a block/missed kick returned for a score ends the game.[/quote]
I like that idea |
Re: Mandos vs. Vagiants post game thread pt1
I don't mind both teams getting a possession. But if the opening defensive team gives up a FG, the offense has to score a TD. Otherwise they lose.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.