Re: FA WR in Vjax and RW
 

Would pass on DJ.

Re: FA WR in Vjax and RW
 

[quote=artmonkforhallofamein07;890726]Would pass on DJ.[/quote]

Yea his attitude worries me but boy is he scary when he gets his hands on the ball.

Re: FA WR in Vjax and RW
 

[quote=Ruhskins;890666]I personally don't think this is a big deal. Also, our team needs to figure out a way to deal with these type of players. You're not going to get 52 angels in the team, there needs to be leadership in the locker room and the coaching staff.[/quote]

i agree with you. i think celebrations are more closely related to the lack of strong leadership within the organization. it wouldnt be a problem here. that aside, id take johnsons touchdowns with the accompanying celebrations and penalties vs. our receivers with nothing to celebrate in the 1st place.

Re: FA WR in Vjax and RW
 

nevermind about desean, he just got tagged

Re: FA WR in Vjax and RW
 

[quote=Lotus;890401]

I like how we "never hesitate to spend big in free agency," despite the fact that we've been relatively tame over the last couple of years.[/quote]


I swear, I NEVER hear sports analyst mention this fact. Was watching PTI, and Wilborn (who Im a fan of) was talking about how if we get RGIII we will "ruin him like this franchise has ruined players for the the last 15+ years".

Like WTF, can you at least mention that this is a different FO then the past? If you are going to sh-t on our FO, at least pinpoint current members of it, instead of talking like Vinny C. is still running things......

I swear to GOD I hope we draft RGIII and he ends up being a super BEAST and SHITS on the league and gets us many Superbowls, mainly so I can watch these sports analyst and Redskin haters be forced to slurp us off....

Re: FA WR in Vjax and RW
 

If I could pick my two WRs from this FA group, I'd take Steve Johnson & Mike Wallace (it's being reported that Shitzburgh will not franchise tag him). My 1st option between the two would Mike Wallace.

If the prices wasnt extremely high, I'd put them (or one of the two) with Hankerson.