![]() |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=12thMan;730978]Wow! The Michigan v. Notre Dame game prob deserves it's on thread. Classic for sure. Denard Robinson is like..words can't even describe this kid.
What a damn game![/quote] Robinson has looked good against 2 sub-par defenses, but if Dane Christ doesn't get hurt after the first drive, the game probably has a different outcome. |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=12thMan;730978]Wow! The Michigan v. Notre Dame game prob deserves it's on thread. Classic for sure. Denard Robinson is like..words can't even describe this kid.
What a damn game![/quote] Probably just a case of two average teams exchanging blows. As the year goes on it'll probably look more and more like The Tech/Boise game. |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;730980]Robinson has looked good against 2 sub-par defenses, but if Dane Christ doesn't get hurt after the first drive, the game probably has a different outcome.[/quote]
Boy, you sure give credit very grudgingly, don't you? And you love the what if game. This wasn't Georgia playing Cheyenne State. Michigan v. Notre Dame! The kid has, what, nearly 900 total yds in 2 games!! C'mon Quake? He has to be the front runner for the Heisman after the first two games. |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=12thMan;730983]Boy, you sure give credit very grudgingly, don't you? And you love the what if game. This wasn't Georgia playing Cheyenne State. Michigan v. Notre Dame!
The kid has, what, nearly 900 total yds in 2 games!! C'mon Quake? He has to be the front runner for the Heisman after the first two games.[/quote] No he doesn't, against 2 sub-par defenses, and both Michigan and Notre Dame borderline stink. This wasn't Alabama vs. Ohio State its exactly what Dirtbag said it was. Also, to say Christ leaving didn't affect the game is blasphemous. |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
Is there a way that both Michigan and Notre Dame can both loose? Rich Rodreiguez and Brian Kelly are the two worst coaches in college football from a scandalous stand point.
|
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
If he's still doing this 4 weeks from now then yes he should be the frontrunner but now nah.
|
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
Just got back from greeting the JMU team coming back from the Tech game. Words cannot describe how pumped us Dukes are. J...M...U....DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKES!!!!!!!
|
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=FRPLG;730991]Just got back from greeting the JMU team coming back from the Tech game. Words cannot describe how pumped us Dukes are. J...M...U....DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKES!!!!!!![/quote]
Who??????? |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=Dirtbag359;730992]Who???????[/quote]
who what? |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=FRPLG;730993]who what?[/quote]
I don't know you were going on about some JMU Dukes? I never heard of them :D |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
you have now
|
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=Dirtbag359;730987]Is there a way that both Michigan and Notre Dame can both loose? Rich Rodreiguez and Brian Kelly are the two worst coaches in college football from a scandalous stand point.[/quote]Those guys are way worse than the coaches in the south who over-recruit and then screw over 18 year old kids by pulling their scholarships.
|
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=GTripp0012;730996]Those guys are way worse than the coaches in the south who over-recruit and then screw over 18 year old kids by pulling their scholarships.[/quote]
Which coaches are these. I make it a point of knowing who I shouldn't like. I imagine Petrino has to be one of them. |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=mooby;730967]Time to call this a rebuilding year instead of a contending year. Looks like VT's young guys are gonna need some time to adjust to playing for a supposed-to-be contender.[/quote]
damn shame that its a "rebuilding year" with a senior qb thats started games the last 4 years, all of our running backs have experience, all our receivers are upper classmen pretty much, upper classman o-line...its damn sad that its come to this. we suck on both lines and our linebackers arent good enough, bottom line. congrats to jmu for the win today, but no offense its just inexcusable that VT loses at home to a 1AA team. again, i mean no disrespect to jmu fans or their team, but this is a disgrace. |
Re: ***2010-2011 College Football Thread***
[quote=Dirtbag359;730994]I don't know you were going on about some JMU Dukes? I never heard of them :D[/quote]
What a disaster for Boise State. Va Tech was obviously WAY over-ranked. Losing in Blacksburg to a subdivision team? Wowwwy. Boise State went from, "hey, we beat a top 10 team on the road" to "wow, we only beat a team by 3 that got handled by a subdivision team at home." I wonder if Chico2321 still thinks Boise State could "whoop" the SEC.... |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.