Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=Chico23231;1300535]You know people are tired of their business being burned down and destroyed for no good reason. They have just as much right to be their protecting their business…it’s not illegal.

Also, how about the folks who attacked him, all convicted violent felons, leave him alone? People do not have the right to riot. It was not a peaceful protest if you are attacking people.

I think people need to look at the facts in the case, because the media continues to repeat falsehoods

I think folks need to understand there are consequences for your actions…especially in a riot. Multiple people had guns around Kyle as well[/quote]

Come on, what vested interest did a 17 year old have there?

I'm not even arguing about the fact he got off, I just can't think of any legit reason why he should have been there to begin with.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=jamf;1300527]Dude wasn't mature enough to have his own car and drive himself there but he was man enough to play Rambo with an assault rifle.

[B]Every wannabe Navy Seal, Green Beret, and Force Recon Marine is going to trade in their airsoft rifle for the real thing and find a protest.
[/B]
[IMG]https://memeguy.com/photos/images/meal-team-six-374054.png[/IMG][/quote]

Over one verdict? I mean come on.

I am as DEM as they come but because of this verdict the GOVT isn't printing get out of jail free cards now for shooters.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1300539]Come on, what vested interest did a 17 year old have there?

I'm not even arguing about the fact he got off, I just can't think of any legit reason why he should have been there to begin with.[/quote]

His vested interest is his community not being destroyed for zero reason. None. People were fed up. He had a right to be there.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1300539]Come on, what vested interest did a 17 year old have there?

I'm not even arguing about the fact he got off, I just can't think of any legit reason why he should have been there to begin with.[/quote]

The 2 people that got killed had no good reason to be there either.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

2nd rule of fight club, don't go after someone holding an AR15, you are likely to get fucking shot and killed.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[QUOTE=sdskinsfan2001;1300545]The 2 people that got killed had no good reason to be there either.[/QUOTE]


Yes. They did.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=punch it in;1300547]Yes. They did.[/quote]

No. They didn't. Rioting and looting are not good reasons. I don't care what that started out as, but by the time the shootings happened that was not a protest at that point in time. They placed themselves in positions where they could get shot and they did.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[QUOTE=sdskinsfan2001;1300552]No. They didn't. Rioting and looting are not good reasons. I don't care what that started out as, but by the time the shootings happened that was not a protest at that point in time. They placed themselves in positions where they could get shot and they did.[/QUOTE]


Lol. That is the police job to determine not some racist cunt bothered by BLM and their supporters with a gun he can barely carry.

Id feel the same way if some anti Trumper went down to the Capitol and pretended to be a cop.

The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

The little racist motherfucker wouldn’t have been bothered if he lived in DC, and people were rioting, looting, and damaging property there. Neither would most of the people defending him. Because those were white people. White people who had no good reason to be there whatsoever. It didn’t start as something good. It was never something with good intentions. But i hear zero about rioting or looting or a fuckin insurrection of our government from the people who are so concerned about the buildings in Kenosha. Please.

Im not talking about you SD, i know you have a problem with that too. And had some anti trumper marched in there with a gun full vigilante id have a problem with them too.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

Punch…lawd Jesus. I’m gonna pray for you.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=punch it in;1300556]The little racist motherfucker wouldn’t have been bothered if he lived in DC, and people were rioting, looting, and damaging property there. Neither would most of the people defending him. Because those were white people. White people who had no good reason to be there whatsoever. It didn’t start as something good. It was never something with good intentions. But i hear zero about rioting or looting or a fuckin insurrection of our government from the people who are so concerned about the buildings in Kenosha. Please.

[B]Im not talking about you SD, i know you have a problem with that too.[/B] And had some anti trumper marched in there with a gun full vigilante id have a problem with them too.[/quote]

Saw the 1st part and was about to say whoa now, saw the 2nd part and say...

[IMG]https://www.snopes.com/tachyon/2019/07/91ApW1z.gif[/IMG]

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[IMG]https://media3.giphy.com/media/gVoBC0SuaHStq/giphy.gif[/IMG]

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=Chico23231;1300544]His vested interest is his community not being destroyed for zero reason. None. People were fed up. He had a right to be there.[/quote]

Stop, you're being ridiculous. Unless he was protecting family or his own private property, a minor with a gun had zero business being there. Bad idea right from the start. And the end result (two dead) proves the point.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1300567]Stop, you're being ridiculous. Unless he was protecting family or his own private property, a minor with a gun had zero business being there. Bad idea right from the start. And the end result (two dead) proves the point.[/quote]

You might think it’s ridiculous, but he had a right just as anyone else to be there. It’s completely unacceptable to think a person has a right to commit violence, burn, loot, and destroy things thinking they can’t be harmed in the process. Kyle would be home if the rioters woulda stayed home.

You understand he was attacked right? And if he wasn’t attacked those 2 convicted violent felons would still be alive.

Justice was served and Kyle rightly was found innocent.

Re: The 2nd Amendment Thread
 

[quote=Chico23231;1300571]You might think it’s ridiculous, but he had a right just as anyone else to be there. It’s completely unacceptable to think a person has a right to commit violence, burn, loot, and destroy things thinking they can’t be harmed in the process. Kyle would be home if the rioters woulda stayed home.

You understand he was attacked right? And if he wasn’t attacked those 2 convicted violent felons would still be alive.

Justice was served and Kyle rightly was found innocent.[/quote]

Yes it's ridiculous to me you think it was a good idea for a kid, a minor child, to show up to an already volatile situation with a gun. Absolutely fucking ridiculous. Again, he wasn't protecting family or property. He stuck his nose in where it didn't belong and two people are dead because he's an idiot.