Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKoBZA1WUAE6qKe?format=jpg&name=4096x4096[/IMG]

click for larger image

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKoEIIEXMAoz08_?format=jpg&name=medium[/IMG]

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKoEIIHXMAAPk8M?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG]

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKoEIIEWQAkgwMl?format=jpg&name=medium[/IMG]

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1309807][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKjo1-fXwAAA0yn?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG]

Imagine how fast these would go[/quote]


we can dream

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKrQ8GfWUAQrayj?format=jpg&name=small[/IMG]

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

He def looks good in those threads....

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

That crest is just flat out embarrassing. The people responsible for that should be ashamed of themselves.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

I'm over the negativity, I love the set up and that's all I care about

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1309893]That crest is just flat out embarrassing. The people responsible for that should be ashamed of themselves.[/quote]

It's a bit messy but they can update it.. Remember the Ravens uniforms were bad at first too..

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1309893]That crest is just flat out embarrassing. The people responsible for that should be ashamed of themselves.[/quote]

I like the idea behind it and the overall set up. I wish the bottom left wedge was the Washington flag with the stars aligned and the two bars below. What don't you like about it?

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1309893]That crest is just flat out embarrassing. The people responsible for that should be ashamed of themselves.[/quote]

I disagree, the crest is the least of my concerns. Think the road jerseys and the black alternates need work. The road jerseys definitely need a color update - not sure what color they are but the numbers and stripes definitely aren't burgundy.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1309893]That crest is just flat out embarrassing. The people responsible for that should be ashamed of themselves.[/quote]

I actually don't mind the crest. But I would remove the white ring with the Washington Football and years.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

I think we all just expected more, and rightfully so, when you consider that they told us it was going to be such a long process so they could get it right. However, things like logos will likely evolve and in some cases be phased out entirely. It's all a little in your face right now because "We're Washington!" but also "We're the Commanders!" and "Hey remember we're not a new team, we're an old team reborn! so here are our Superbowls on this seemingly superfluous team crest to remind you of that!"

IMO I hope the W gets phased out, and the crest gets tweaked and becomes the primary logo.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

The idea of a black alternate is great, but as is usually the case the execution is a lacking. Thought, or would have preferred, more burgundy highlights/ features in the black, personally I think black and burgundy are a good combo. I would have liked a half black half burgundy helmet similar to the fade pattern that the Jags have

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

Just asking a question here, as all of you are aware of they are "throw back uniforms" that teams wear .How will the new name and uniform change that, again just asking?

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=Giantone;1309903]Just asking a question here, as all of you are aware of they are "throw back uniforms" that teams wear .How will the new name and uniform change that, again just asking?[/quote]

I'd imagine they will just use WFT as a throwback

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

Since that dumb rule about not having alternate helmets went away I want to see these again

[IMG]https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/4/396/6_8396004.png[/IMG]

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the alternate Black uniform take the place of the throwback for now?

John Keim mentions that a fourth uniform will be introduced in 2024 "with fan involvement"

[URL="https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33198434/washington-commanders-nfl-franchise-search-new-nickname-logo"]Article for reference[/URL]

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=MTK;1309906]Since that dumb rule about not having alternate helmets went away I want to see these again

[IMG]https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/4/396/6_8396004.png[/IMG][/quote]

They won't do the jerseys though which is the best part IMO.. Those were my favorite Skins jerseys

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1309909]They won't do the jerseys though which is the best part IMO.. Those were my favorite Skins jerseys[/quote]

Take the patches off problem solved

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=MTK;1309911]Take the patches off problem solved[/quote]

True and put the W on them,

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

Ultimately though I don't think there's any requirement that teams have a throwback, so the black alternate will be the special occasion uni I'm thinking

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

There is a rule and some of you might know this already as it recently came up with the Lions, it states that once a team redesigns it uniforms they cant change for 5 seasons.

The lions came up as the team's GM was asked about changing the all gray color rush ones. So these aren't going anywhere for at least that long.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=MTK;1309911]Take the patches off problem solved[/quote]

Were the patches even authentic to the time period?

I would be fine replacing the patches but keeping the rest of the design.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

It's the years that they put on the crest... The 83 Redskins lost in the SB. The 88 Redskins missed the playoffs and went 7-9. 92 was a 9-7 season and lost in the 2nd round to the 49ers. No one associates those teams as SB winners. Get what I'm saying?

When I see stuff like this, as well as the uniforms, it is pretty obvious that the people making decisions that's aren't from here. That white uniform is fine if you are a Cards fan. That red ain't us. That black ain't us. The core NFL teams don't mess w/ tradition. Do you see the Giants or Cowboys having all blacks? This is the shit Jacksonville does, or what college teams do. Hopefully they'll make adjustments and get it right. I doubt it. They're too stupid.

I also get the feel that they're looking to market to younger fans, which is probably smart cause most of my generation have checked out.

After yesterday I am just done. My emotions for the team are just dead. I'll still come on here cause I love talking football. But I just don't care what this team does anymore. Maybe that'll change in time but I just can't take it. I can't take Jason Wright lying to me. I can't take the Sean Taylor fuck up. I could go on and on... And most of all the losing and lack of playoff success and the inability to manage the QB position.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

go commies - is already a shirt and joke as well

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

i 100% agree the white jerseys are fucked and i dont care for black alt's.

the alt's may grow on me but the white is garbage

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=Ohioskins;1309878]The black uniforms are hideous.[/quote]

straight up jim zorn in here

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1309923][B]It's the years that they put on the crest... The 83 Redskins lost in the SB. The 88 Redskins missed the playoffs and went 7-9. 92 was a 9-7 season and lost in the 2nd round to the 49ers. No one associates those teams as SB winners. Get what I'm saying? [/B]

When I see stuff like this, as well as the uniforms, it is pretty obvious that the people making decisions that's aren't from here. That white uniform is fine if you are a Cards fan. That red ain't us. That black ain't us. The core NFL teams don't mess w/ tradition. Do you see the Giants or Cowboys having all blacks? This is the shit Jacksonville does, or what college teams do. Hopefully they'll make adjustments and get it right. I doubt it. They're too stupid.

I also get the feel that they're looking to market to younger fans, which is probably smart cause most of my generation have checked out.

After yesterday I am just done. My emotions for the team are just dead. I'll still come on here cause I love talking football. But I just don't care what this team does anymore. Maybe that'll change in time but I just can't take it. I can't take Jason Wright lying to me. I can't take the Sean Taylor fuck up. I could go on and on... And most of all the losing and lack of playoff success and the inability to manage the QB position.[/quote]

Dude that is such a gray area, all football seasons fall over two calendar years not sure why you are blaming the Coms on this one.

Anyone so worked up about a football team changing its name must live a charmed life.

Jason Wright lying to you??? Is he your daddy or something, i could give two fucks if he lied to me he don't know me from Adam or vice averse.

If you are so PISSED OFF GTFO no one cares i promise you no one cares especially at Commanders Park.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

Wright was on with Kevin Sheehan this morning and apparently they are open to changing the years on the crest. Personally I could care less, they went with commemorating the year they won vs what season the team is associated with, but if it helps straighten out some panties out there than just do it.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=MTK;1309932]Wright was on with Kevin Sheehan this morning and apparently they are open to changing the years on the crest. Personally I could care less, they went with commemorating the year they won vs what season the team is associated with, but if it helps straighten out some panties out there than just do it.[/quote]

I think both sides have a valid point - the games were played in the following year but they represent the culmination of the previous season.

So we were champs following the 1982, 1987, and 1991 seasons, but the games were in the following years. I lean 60/40 towards honoring the season that was played vs. the day the title was won but honestly the argument is a little irrelevant to me as I didn't witness any of it.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=mooby;1309934]I think both sides have a valid point - the games were played in the following year but they represent the culmination of the previous season.

So we were champs following the 1982, 1987, and 1991 seasons, but the games were in the following years. I lean 60/40 towards honoring the season that was played vs. the day the title was won but honestly the argument is a little irrelevant to me as I didn't witness any of it.[/quote]

If they had just gone with 82, 87, 91 nobody would be complaining right now, so I get it. But I also see what they were going for. The decision as to what years to put on there should have been vetted more thoroughly that's for sure.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=mredskins;1309930]Dude that is such a gray area, all football seasons fall over two calendar years not sure why you are blaming the Coms on this one.

Anyone so worked up about a football team changing its name must live a charmed life.

Jason Wright lying to you??? Is he your daddy or something, i could give two fucks if he lied to me he don't know me from Adam or vice averse.

If you are so PISSED OFF GTFO no one cares i promise you no one cares especially at Commanders Park.[/quote]

I ain't getting into a pissing match w/ you. That calendar stuff is just way off.. If you aren't smart enough to understand the issue then so be it. That celebration of the 92 Skins last week was great.. smfh

And you are correct. No one cares over to Commie Park. And that is the exact reason their stadium is infested w/ opposing teams fans.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

Maybe they should use 1937 - 1942 - XVII - XXII - XXVI

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=MTK;1309932]Wright was on with Kevin Sheehan this morning and apparently they are open to changing the years on the crest. Personally I could care less, they went with commemorating the year they won vs what season the team is associated with, but if it helps straighten out some panties out there than just do it.[/quote]

As I said it my post it's not just the crest thing. It's everything single thing w/ them.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=MTK;1309935]If they had just gone with 82, 87, 91 nobody would be complaining right now, so I get it. But I also see what they were going for. The decision as to what years to put on there should have been vetted more thoroughly that's for sure.[/quote]

The dates on the rings are 82, 87, 91. That's the dates I'd have used.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=MTK;1309935]If they had just gone with 82, 87, 91 nobody would be complaining right now, so I get it. But I also see what they were going for. The decision as to what years to put on there should have been vetted more thoroughly that's for sure.[/quote]
83, 88, and 92 jumped out at me immediately as WRONG. This inattention to detail is an insult to long-time fans who know better. Pro Football Reference is the definitive reference for players, teams, and seasons of the NFL - they have it correct: 82, 87, and 91. When discussing all-time great teams, you never hear mention of the 86 Bears, do you? [url]https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/[/url]

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=SouperMeister;1309941]83, 88, and 92 jumped out at me immediately as WRONG. This inattention to detail is an insult to long-time fans who know better. Pro Football Reference is the definitive reference for players, teams, and seasons of the NFL - they have it correct: 82, 87, and 91. When discussing all-time great teams, you never hear mention of the 86 Bears, do you? [url]https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/[/url][/quote]

Yes I get it, they should have used 82, 87, 91. But technically, the years they used aren't wrong, they just aren't the commonly accepted way we refer to those teams.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=SouperMeister;1309941]83, 88, and 92 jumped out at me immediately as WRONG. This inattention to detail is an insult to long-time fans who know better. Pro Football Reference is the definitive reference for players, teams, and seasons of the NFL - they have it correct: 82, 87, and 91. When discussing all-time great teams, you never hear mention of the 86 Bears, do you? [url]https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/[/url][/quote]

Agree…these guys can’t get out of their own way.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

Wright trying to justify it makes him look like a straight up fool. He is just a empty suit. These are simple details that a 12 year old can get right.

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1309948]Wright trying to justify it makes him look like a straight up fool. He is just a empty suit. These are simple details that a 12 year old can get right.[/quote]

Yeah it makes him look like a clown TBH... Just be honest

Re: Welcome your Washington Commanders
 

There is a lot more going on in this world light years more important than a nfl name change … I’m just rolling with it cause it ain’t a damn thing I can do to change it ..I refuse to be mad or bitter about this .. it will eat you up .. everyone has voiced there opinion it’s time to focus on Qb , free agency, draft etc ..I doubt that there is any of us that would walk into our bosses office and tell him what a damn fool he is .. Jason has a nice job and a family to provide for .. I don’t fault him at all .. I’m am supporting him !