![]() |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=angryssg;322130]I am not questioning that. I said to correct me if I was wrong. So it was only his first season that they had him listed as a FB.[/quote]
no the first 2 seasons |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;322136]no the first 2 seasons[/quote]
Alright jackass, I said to correct me if I was wrong, not get freakin technical on me. But thanks. |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=angryssg;322144]Alright jackass, I said to correct me if I was wrong, not get freakin technical on me. But thanks.[/quote]
that is what i was doing sorry if it came off wrong |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;322147]that is what i was doing sorry if it came off wrong[/quote]
Giving you a hard time.I am in the mood to mess with people a little. My son is finally comming by cover of darkness. 6 hours and counting |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[QUOTE=angryssg;322149]Giving you a hard time.I am in the mood to mess with people a little. My son is finally comming by cover of darkness. 6 hours and counting[/QUOTE]
Closing in on 1,500! |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=SmootSmack;322150]Closing in on 1,500![/quote]
Thanks I just realized that. |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=SmootSmack;322150]Closing in on 1,500![/quote]
and he doesnt play in denver. that makes it an accomplishment. |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=Tha Posse;321733]So what would be the difference in cost for a franchised TE and a franchised H-Back. Would they just go by the average of the top TE's in the league or H-Backs? Kind of a loop hole if it would work, there aren't many H-Backs(on paper) in the NFL. Regardless I pray it wouldn't come to us franchising Cooley![/quote]
There is no designation for FB or H-Back. Both would fall under RB, which would be a huge difference in the franchise tag number from the TE position. Regardless, it doesn't matter, Cooley is a TE now under Saunders system. |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=WarriorSpirit;322963]There is no designation for FB or H-Back. Both would fall under RB, which would be a huge difference in the franchise tag number from the TE position.
Regardless, it doesn't matter, Cooley is a TE now under Saunders system.[/quote] Where is NoVa???? |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;322970]Where is NoVa????[/quote]
LOL, Northern Virginia, Leesburg specifically. I need to capitalize the 'A' and I will right now. |
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
[quote=WarriorSpirit;322978]LOL, Northern Virginia, Leesburg specifically. I need to capitalize the 'A' and I will right now.[/quote]
sweet, sweet, i will remember that. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.