Re: Patten on Ramsey
 

[QUOTE=Defensewins]Three years??? I did not know you have the ability to look into the future.

IF (and that is a big if) Campbell wins the Redskins a Superbowl or plays at a probowl level and gets us into the playoffs, the price will not have been too much. It will have been worth it.
Gibss is not perfect, but he did make one good player choice, when he choose Sean Taylor over Kellen Winslow II.[/QUOTE]


I do, just take a look at my past comments about Brunell, and the Portis trade, I was dead on, as I will be with Campbell it's only a matter of time.

If Ramsey can't get it done under Gibbs, no way Campbell will either.

Gibbs has made much more than just 1 good decision in Taylor regardless of how much of a problem this kid turns out to be, he has defiently made good moves Cooley was a tremendous move for us, the problem is he is creating a big problem cap wise with highly over priced players, Brunell and Portis are absolultly killing us cap wise we have something like 95 mil tied up between the 2, I like Clinton but not for what we gave up in trade or money, and couple that with the fact that we have to redesign the offensive blocking schemes for him [ which by the way I said we would have to do when we traded for him ] I just feel other backs were available at far more reasonable price that would have been more conducive to Gibbs style of offensive running game.

Re: Patten on Ramsey
 

Regardless of how those backs would have played, it wasn't because Clinton was too small, it was because the offense was outdated. Even if he had a bruiser back, I don't think it would have been that much better.