Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

[QUOTE=Eknox;432219]He couldn't hurt, and should come cheap I would like to have both of them we need something different to happen at wideout, it was pititful and painful watching the receivers last year. Especially in Indianapolis[/QUOTE]

??? I don't get it? Idianapolis?

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

[QUOTE=30gut;432455]??? I don't get it? Idianapolis?[/QUOTE]

Yea, same here I don't get it, we didn't face Indianapolis last year?

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

I saw Jackson play some last season with the Niners, he looked like Rod Gardner most of the time (couldn't catch)

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

[quote=SeanTaylor21;432466]Yea, same here I don't get it, we didn't face Indianapolis last year?[/quote]

No we didn't face Indianapolis , but if your team isn't matching the Colts win for win then you here the your team sucks words from the Colt fans every week through out the season..

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

[QUOTE=Eknox;432507]No we didn't face Indianapolis , but if your team isn't matching the Colts win for win then you here the your team sucks words from the Colt fans every week through out the season..[/QUOTE]

I take it you live in Indy?

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

C'mon people. Jackson is being released by the worst offense in the NFL. Why would we want this guy? All he does is drop passes. And I don't care if he knows the offense. At some point every NFL WR probably knows some version of the WC offense.

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

[quote=SmootSmack;432508]I take it you live in Indy?[/quote]

you got it Til the wife and I are out of school. She's an RN I'm a Xray tech

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

[quote=skinsfan69;432538]C'mon people. Jackson is being released by the worst offense in the NFL. Why would we want this guy? All he does is drop passes. And I don't care if he knows the offense. At some point every NFL WR probably knows some version of the WC offense.[/quote]

Because he was released by the worst offense in the league. Jackson came from a team that struggled at the QB position last year. Hell, even Randy Moss struggled without a decent QB to get him the ball. And it's not like we're going to give the guy 100's of millions of thousands of dollars. The guy will help shore up our receiving core and allow us to use the draft to take care of more pressing needs, though I would love to see the team trade down with a team like the Falcons and have three second round picks.

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

yeah butthis guy isnt any bigger than reche caldwell?? The only way I would sign this guy is if Reche doesnt come back I doubt he will even be able to stay healthy though.

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

If Jackson is our best option I'd just stick with what we've got and look to the draft. Seems like we're headed that way anyway barring some sort of mega deal for someone like Chad Johnson.

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

[quote=Mattyk72;432637]If Jackson is our best option I'd just stick with what we've got and look to the draft. [/quote]

You know what that makes me think that maybe we should just stick with the guys we have and follow the Chargers Offensive model. I mean we got a good young Quarterback, a pair of 1337 running backs, a very good offensive line (though I would like to see us build for the future through the draft), and a group of Recievers thats just as good if not better then the Chargers. And to top that off we have a very good offensive mind as our head coach, though I hope he'll be better then Norv.

Ironically though our third Running Back is a very good kick returner. Of course Darren Sproles is there second running back for now, or at least thats what I think he would be.

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72;432637]If Jackson is our best option I'd just stick with what we've got and look to the draft. Seems like we're headed that way anyway barring some sort of mega deal for someone like Chad Johnson.[/QUOTE]

Couldnt have said it better myself. I agree 2000%!!!

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

Old thread here, but didn't want to start a new one on this.

Anyhow, Jackson could be headed to the Broncos

[url=http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_8914836]Two wide receivers attract Denver's eye - The Denver Post[/url]

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

I don't see why the skins didn't at least make him a modest offer. Just as insurance in case they are not able to land the WR they want in the draft.

Re: Darrell Jackson?
 

Too many injuries...