Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

I think we need to go best bang for the buck and stick at #15. We need an impact player there and we should be able to get one, likely on D. A big no to WR at 15 though.

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

Just a body.. Or our new LG.

[url]https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1115329320304762882[/url]

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=GridIron26;1221195]Just a body.. Or our new LG.

[url]https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1115329320304762882[/url][/quote]

most likely just a camp body. If he makes it after the first wave of cuts, it means our guard situation is really really really bad. I mean, he couldn't make the Jags practice squad and their o-line was horrible.

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=GridIron26;1221195]Just a body.. Or our new LG.

[url]https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1115329320304762882[/url][/quote]

After I misspelled Shawn Laouvo over and over again...this guy would be the easy transition to take over both roles as LG and likeliest player I misspell constantly.

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1221189]I think we need to go best bang for the buck and stick at #15. We need an impact player there and we should be able to get one, likely on D. A big no to WR at 15 though.[/quote]

Would you take Hockenson if he's there at 15? Or focus on an edge rusher.

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[QUOTE=calia;1221199]Would you take Hockenson if he's there at 15? Or focus on an edge rusher.[/QUOTE]


Hockenson



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=GridIron26;1221195]Just a body.. Or our new LG.

[url]https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1115329320304762882[/url][/quote]

If he's anything more than a camp body, I'll have a massive L.O.L at this organisation.
Just have a look at the [URL="https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/02/08/aaf-puts-significant-limits-on-blitzes/"]AAF defensive restrictions[/URL] (basically no more than 5 blitzers, restrictions on stunts) : these guys don't even know the basics of adjusting pass protection.
As BHA said, these guys didn't even make one of the 32 practice squads, with teams, including us, having glaring OL holes...

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

Flowers is going to be LG and I pray he's not a disaster there

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1221204]Flowers is going to be LG and I pray he's not a disaster there

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk[/quote]

They will draft someone to compete with Flowers.

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1221201]Hockenson



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

I'd take either with a smile on my face. We need a front line bad ass at both spots.

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1221201]Hockenson



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Him or Noah Fant

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1221219]Him or Noah Fant[/quote]

According to Cooley's Pod, Fant and Hockenson are apples and oranges.

Fant isn't even close to being the 15th pick.

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

No suspension expected for Reuben Foster.

[url]https://twitter.com/JPFinlayNBCS/status/1116791045717499904[/url]

*edit* He'll be fined 2 game checks but no suspension. Big win for us!

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=DYoungJelly;1221232]According to Cooley's Pod, Fant and Hockenson are apples and oranges.

Fant isn't even close to being the 15th pick.[/quote]

Everyone has their projections and all that, Cooley knows TE's about as good as their is but he's not 100% right all the time. Just like Kiper, Mcshay etc aren't. Fant is a Jordan Reed type TE but a better blocker, in fact some would say he's better all around than Hockerson due to his route running.

Re: Redskins Free Agency Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1221404]Everyone has their projections and all that, Cooley knows TE's about as good as their is but he's not 100% right all the time. Just like Kiper, Mcshay etc aren't. Fant is a Jordan Reed type TE but a better blocker, in fact some would say he's better all around than Hockerson due to his route running.[/quote]

That's interesting.

In the same Pod as his Hockenson film breakdown (#55) he was talking about how Fant's routes were sloppy and he couldn't block anyone.

He doesn't view Fant as a weapon other than as a downfield threat with his speed.