Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1167032]I really don't see Cooley as an ass kisser, but he may not be happy that SM never gave him a shot to get back on the field.

[B]We are really going to argue over which 5th string WR we should have kept? ok...[/quote][/B]

It was brought up in the article so that's why I mentioned it. Things like that probably go on in every organization, but SM was suppose to have control over the roster. If he wanted to move on from Grant and was overruled then that's probably one many reasons he walked out..

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[quote=mredskins;1167037]Then:
[IMG]https://thebloguin.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/scotmccloughan.png[/IMG]

Now:

[IMG]http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/uploads/usat-images/2016/04/9695011-nfl-green-bay-packers-at-washington-redskins-850x560.jpeg[/IMG][/quote]

Looks like he's got a big "heat-on"!!

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1167057]The problem, of course, is whether the article is authoritative, or speculative. If authoritative, then you would be right. But it isn't. It's reporters culling sources and making an article out of it. We don't, and may never, know the full story, but to assume only wrong on one side, ie "drinking was never an issue", seems to imply a bias in the reporting to me. An alcoholic, just like any other addict will have days and weeks where his/her addiction overrides his/her ability to function at work.[/quote]

Journalist who wrote it is a stand up, guy in the know. I didn't read it as speculative at all. Seems well sourced with clear events and examples of a power struggle between Bruce and McC.

The drinking issue is mention and vetted in the article. If there was more of a story there, we should have heard of this from other sources.

But other sources have clearly speculated on dysfunction within the org and NOT a drinking problem.

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[QUOTE=mredskins;1167037]Then:

[IMG]https://thebloguin.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/scotmccloughan.png[/IMG]



Now:



[IMG]http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/uploads/usat-images/2016/04/9695011-nfl-green-bay-packers-at-washington-redskins-850x560.jpeg[/IMG][/QUOTE]



Wow

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

McC was not destined to prevail in a contest between him and BA. Allen is the proxy for DS in all things, and in that sense, a necessary evil. We're better off these days not having Dan going on man-dates with players he has a crush on. Yet Dan's desires have to be channeled through someone, and Allen plays that role pretty well; I only half hate him.

So with Jay's stock rising and inevitable style/ego clashes between McC and BA (in part, channeling Snyder), McC clearly is the odd man out.

The best we can hope for is that (1) BA continues to acknowledge that he needs help with talent evaluation, and (2) Cousins gets signed. If those things don't happen, then you can throw a match into the dumpster.

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[quote=MTK;1167068]Wow[/quote]

exactly . . . that says a ton!!

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

And I thought Patriots fans were idiots when they tried to raise money to pay Brady's fine...

[url=http://washington.cbslocal.com/2017/03/09/redskins-fans-plan-march-ashburn/]Redskins Fans Plan ‘March on Ashburn’ to Protest Allen, Redskins « CBS DC[/url]

[IMG]https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Captain-Picard-Facepalm.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

So inspite of Allen saying McLoughan had final say on roster, he never did it. Bruce Allen and whoever enables him is just lying to us all.

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[quote=mredskins;1167037]Then:
[IMG]https://thebloguin.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/scotmccloughan.png[/IMG]

Now:

[IMG]http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/uploads/usat-images/2016/04/9695011-nfl-green-bay-packers-at-washington-redskins-850x560.jpeg[/IMG][/quote]

OMG! These two photos taken only about a year apart from each other. That kind of puts things in perspective a bit.

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[QUOTE=mredskins;1167037]Then:

[IMG]https://thebloguin.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/scotmccloughan.png[/IMG]



Now:



[IMG]http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/uploads/usat-images/2016/04/9695011-nfl-green-bay-packers-at-washington-redskins-850x560.jpeg[/IMG][/QUOTE]



C'mon guys, no one really knows if he was drinking. Could be he went on a Twinkie binge and then overdid it in the steam room[emoji41]

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

Does being an alcoholic make your face purple? I get drunk probably too often, never looked like a human plum before.

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1167086]Does being an alcoholic make your face purple? I get drunk probably too often, never looked like a human plum before.[/quote]

[IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/27/1414413607073_wps_5_P0Aj6a7_png.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1167086]Does being an alcoholic make your face purple? I get drunk probably too often, never looked like a human plum before.[/quote]

it most certainly does . . . [URL="https://www.liverdoctor.com/alcohol-affect-way-look/"]Source:[/URL]

[quote]One of the earliest signs of alcohol abuse is a persistently red face due to enlarged blood vessels. ... It is due to acetaldehyde, the main breakdown product of alcohol. Acetaldehyde is thought to cause flushing by stimulating release of histamine.Sep 9, 2014[/quote]

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

Glad we've moved to pictures in judging who is and who isnt an alcoholic. The scientific way

Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
 

[quote=Chico23231;1167090]Glad we've moved to pictures in judging who is and who isnt an alcoholic. The scientific way[/quote]

A picture's worth a thousand words isn't it? Lol. I had no clue about that before. Guess I'm doing okay, I think my face is still normal.