![]() |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
his ideas are not based on anything other than who he likes to watch. King should have named his article "my favorite qb's in the NFL".
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
The only person who can prove Mr. King wrong is Jason Campbell. I hope JC proves Mr. King to be an ill-informed writer rather than a predictive genius.
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[QUOTE=dmek25;319386]why is everyone getting in an uproar? Mcnabb is easily top 5, and we see where he is ranked. where did he put his boy Eli Manning? king had a big time love affair with cutler, even before he had played a down in this league. man, i cant wait for the real deal to start. i hate arguing over fat, bald headed guys who don't know what they are talking about[/QUOTE]
No way is McNabb better than anyone in PK's top 5. A few years ago he might have been but not now. |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Not sure why its such a surprise where JC is ranked base on how he ranked the QB's and if you read how he ranked them it makes sense. He even kind of joked on where Kitna was in his raking but explained it was based on how he was ranking them.
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[QUOTE=firstdown;319430]Not sure why its such a surprise where JC is ranked base on how he ranked the QB's and if you read how he ranked them it makes sense. He even kind of joked on where Kitna was in his raking but explained it was based on how he was ranking them.[/QUOTE]
Ultimately the rankings represent his prediction of how he thinks the quarterback will perform in 2007. It's not based on any hard methodology or formula. I think most people here feel that it's reasonable to expect more of Campbell in his first full year as a starter. As for the Kitna ranking, if I said the Earth was flat and then made a joke about having said it, it wouldn't make it any less of an ass-stupid comment. |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[quote=irish;319424]No way is McNabb better than anyone in PK's top 5. A few years ago he might have been but not now.[/quote]
then we will have to disagree. the only 2 quarterbacks on the list that deserve to be ranked higher are Manning and Brady. you would seriously take Marc Bulger over Mcnabb? |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Whatever. King is just throwing his opinion out there. Some points he makes will actaully be right (Donovan won't be as hot as he was in 2006 again), Others (such as Romo and Young being more productive than McNabb) will be wrong. That's not a big deal.
Speaking of opinions, heres how I would have done it: 1. Peyton Manning 2. Everyone else With everyone else listed in this order: 2. Marc Bulger 3. Phillip Rivers 4. Matt Leinart 5. Tom Brady 6. Carson Palmer 7. Matt Hasselbeck 8. Matt Schaub 9. Ben Roethlisberger 10. Drew Brees 11. Donovan McNabb 12. Jason Campbell 13. Byron Leftwich 14. Jay Cutler 15. Vince Young 16. Eli Manning 17. Chad Pennington 18. Steve McNair 19. Jon Kitna 20. Jeff Garcia 21. Trent Green 22. Alex Smith 23. Rex Grossman 24. Tony Romo 25. Jake Delhomme 26. Brett Favre 27. Michael Vick 28. Josh McCown 29. Brodie Croyle 30. Charlie Frye 31. JP Losman 32. Tavaris Jackson |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[quote=dmek25;319437]then we will have to disagree. the only 2 quarterbacks on the list that deserve to be ranked higher are Manning and Brady. you would seriously take Marc Bulger over Mcnabb?[/quote]I would absolutely.
I'd put my money on Bulger getting NFL MVP this year assuming my predicition that the Rams run off 11+ wins in the regular season comes true. McNabb's good (obviously), but his entire career suggests that his first 6 games of last season were a mirage, and that he got injured before his numbers could be pulled back down to earth. I'd expect him to have another good season again this year, but top 3 is borderline ridiculous. But then again, you know what they say about opinions. |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
McNabb put up HUGE numbers in 2004, so I'm not sure why anyone would consider what he did last year until he got injured a "mirage".
In fact if you look at his last two injury plagued seasons, if you project those numbers out over a full season his numbers would be pretty much right in line with his 2004 season. |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[quote=GTripp0012;319444]Whatever. King is just throwing his opinion out there. Some points he makes will actaully be right (Donovan won't be as hot as he was in 2006 again), Others (such as Romo and Young being more productive than McNabb) will be wrong. That's not a big deal.
Speaking of opinions, heres how I would have done it: 1. Peyton Manning 2. Everyone else With everyone else listed in this order: 2. Marc Bulger 3. Phillip Rivers 4. Matt Leinart 5. Tom Brady 6. Carson Palmer 7. Matt Hasselbeck 8. Matt Schaub 9. Ben Roethlisberger 10. Drew Brees 11. Donovan McNabb 12. Jason Campbell 13. Byron Leftwich 14. Jay Cutler 15. Vince Young 16. Eli Manning 17. Chad Pennington 18. Steve McNair 19. Jon Kitna 20. Jeff Garcia 21. Trent Green 22. Alex Smith 23. Rex Grossman 24. Tony Romo 25. Jake Delhomme 26. Brett Favre 27. Michael Vick 28. Josh McCown 29. Brodie Croyle 30. Charlie Frye 31. JP Losman 32. Tavaris Jackson[/quote] I was with you up until number 2 |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[quote=GTripp0012;319446]I would absolutely.
I'd put my money on Bulger getting NFL MVP this year assuming my predicition that the Rams run off 11+ wins in the regular season comes true. McNabb's good (obviously), but his entire career suggests that his first 6 games of last season were a mirage, and that he got injured before his numbers could be pulled back down to earth. I'd expect him to have another good season again this year, but top 3 is borderline ridiculous. But then again, you know what they say about opinions.[/quote] I predict the Rams will win 8 at the most. |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[quote=GTripp0012;319444]Whatever. King is just throwing his opinion out there. Some points he makes will actaully be right (Donovan won't be as hot as he was in 2006 again), Others (such as Romo and Young being more productive than McNabb) will be wrong. That's not a big deal.
Speaking of opinions, heres how I would have done it: 1. Peyton Manning 2. Everyone else With everyone else listed in this order: 2. Marc Bulger 3. Phillip Rivers 4. Matt Leinart 5. Tom Brady 6. Carson Palmer 7. Matt Hasselbeck 8. Matt Schaub 9. Ben Roethlisberger 10. Drew Brees 11. Donovan McNabb 12. Jason Campbell 13. Byron Leftwich 14. Jay Cutler 15. Vince Young 16. Eli Manning 17. Chad Pennington 18. Steve McNair 19. Jon Kitna 20. Jeff Garcia 21. Trent Green 22. Alex Smith 23. Rex Grossman 24. Tony Romo 25. Jake Delhomme 26. Brett Favre 27. Michael Vick 28. Josh McCown 29. Brodie Croyle 30. Charlie Frye 31. JP Losman 32. Tavaris Jackson[/quote] Bulger at #2? Rivers at #3? Leinart at #4? Brees at #10? Schaub at #8? I must say one thing, at least you're consistent in your "unique" views around here. |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[quote=irish;319375]Of course its all speculation but I think the reason someone like JC is ranked so low and Cutler is ranked high is the team they play for. Denver is a proven team that is consistently in the playoff hunt. The Skins are a dysfunctional organization that is currently a perennial loser. I think if JC played for a better team he would be ranked higher.[/quote]
Look at Denver's offense and look at ours. On paper, we have the better offense. We have better RB's, better WR's and a better TE. I would say we are even at QB and O-line. |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[quote=GTripp0012;319444]Whatever. King is just throwing his opinion out there. Some points he makes will actaully be right (Donovan won't be as hot as he was in 2006 again), Others (such as Romo and Young being more productive than McNabb) will be wrong. That's not a big deal.
Speaking of opinions, heres how I would have done it: 1. Peyton Manning 2. Everyone else With everyone else listed in this order: 2. Marc Bulger 3. Phillip Rivers 4. Matt Leinart 5. Tom Brady 6. Carson Palmer 7. Matt Hasselbeck 8. Matt Schaub 9. Ben Roethlisberger 10. Drew Brees 11. Donovan McNabb 12. Jason Campbell 13. Byron Leftwich 14. Jay Cutler 15. Vince Young 16. Eli Manning 17. Chad Pennington 18. Steve McNair 19. Jon Kitna 20. Jeff Garcia 21. Trent Green 22. Alex Smith 23. Rex Grossman 24. Tony Romo 25. Jake Delhomme 26. Brett Favre 27. Michael Vick 28. Josh McCown 29. Brodie Croyle 30. Charlie Frye 31. JP Losman 32. Tavaris Jackson[/quote] No way Rivers and Leinart are ranked higher than McNabb, Palmer, Brees and Brady. I mean you are talking about 4 of the best qb's in football vs two guys who have only started one year. Hell, Leinart hasn't even started 16 games. From what I hear, Leinart is having problems with the new offense. Don't be surprised if you see Kurt Warner at some point this year. Also how in the world do you have Schaub ahead of McNabb and Brees? That's nuts! McNabb and Brees are MVP type of players. Brees could have easily won the MVP last year. |
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
[quote=skinsfan69;319466]No way Rivers and Leinart are ranked higher than McNabb, Palmer, Brees and Brady. I mean you are talking about 4 of the best qb's in football vs two guys who have only started one year. Hell, Leinart hasn't even started 16 games. From what I hear, Leinart is having problems with the new offense. Don't be surprised if you see Kurt Warner at some point this year.
Also how in the world do you have Schaub ahead of McNabb and Brees? That's nuts! McNabb and Brees are MVP type of players. Brees could have easily won the MVP last year.[/quote]But I'm not talking about last year. I'm projecting this year. McNabb, Palmer, Brees, and Brady are and will always be successful quarterbacks, but the idea is to pick the guys who are the best in their field for this year. And Rivers, Leinart and Schaub definately fit the criteria. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.