![]() |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2017/12/20/president-trumps-successes-have-been-underreported-gary-varvel-column-nation-now/968842001/[/url]
When you take score, trump has come out relatively strong his first year...but his successes certainly have been underreported |
Re: Media Bias
[QUOTE=Chico23231;1183926][url]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2017/12/20/president-trumps-successes-have-been-underreported-gary-varvel-column-nation-now/968842001/[/url]
When you take score, trump has come out relatively strong his first year...but his successes certainly have been underreported[/QUOTE]On policy and agenda I agree. Unfortunately his negatives are just as strong when you are talking about his public persona, and hyperbole about his own greatness. These points need to be addressed by him and his staff if his presidency is to turn into an overall positive. I doubt they will be though. |
Re: Media Bias
Act like a dick and you're going to get treated like one. He's made the media his #1 enemy since day one.
|
Re: Media Bias
[quote=mooby;1183450]I don't need to check Fox News, but I bet something on their front page is about some liberal politician harassment scandal.
It goes both ways Chico. When's the last time you saw coverage of innocent Muslims being killed on Fox News? How about that pro-Trump school kid from the SW killing his classmates? You already know what their focus is going to be on. You sit here acting like we should be getting outraged on it. If you don't like what their focus is, don't click. You click, the cycle continues. Quit being bated.[/quote] Prince Harry coy about possible Obama wedding invite, Trump snub as 10 Downing stews ^^ current fox news headline. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=over the mountain;1184116]Prince Harry coy about possible Obama wedding invite, Trump snub as 10 Downing stews
^^ current fox news headline.[/quote] Good, Trump is shit . |
Re: Media Bias
[url=http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/28/media/vanity-fair-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/index.html]Hillary Clinton supporters outraged at Vanity Fair, to President Trump's glee - Dec. 28, 2017[/url]
Hilarious...jokes about Hillary are deemed sexist? Whew, these snowflakes are on another level. |
Re: Media Bias
Nice to see President Pussy Grabber is focused on the really important things
|
Re: Media Bias
[quote=MTK;1184279]Nice to see President Pussy Grabber is focused on the really important things[/quote]
Hillary need to leave the public eye...it’s time for the Clintons to move on. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1184281]Hillary need to leave the public eye...it’s time for the Clintons to move on.[/quote]
Yes ,she does need to leave it but it is the GOP and trump supporters that keep bringing her up to deflect from trumps stupidity and ignorance. |
Re: Media Bias
Interesting that at least per Rasmussen Trumps favorable/unfavorable matches Obama's at the end of his first year. 46/53.
|
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1184281]Hillary need to leave the public eye...it’s time for the Clintons to move on.[/quote]
Right, which is why she asked Vanity Fair to share that video advising her what to do in 2018. Am I the only one who couldn't give less of a shit about a weak joke? |
Media Bias
[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;1184296]Interesting that at least per Rasmussen Trumps favorable/unfavorable matches Obama's at the end of his first year. 46/53.[/QUOTE]
Well yeah Obama took over when the economy was in the tank so.... That also seems a little generous for Trump, it’s a very conservative leaning poll, but of course Trump pimps the results of that one while dismissing any other ones as “fake” |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1184296]Interesting that at least per Rasmussen Trumps favorable/unfavorable matches Obama's at the end of his first year. 46/53.[/quote]
Rasmussen relies heavily on landline calls for polling so their cross-reference of a community tends to be just what old people think. Election results I suppose are the only true indicator. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=over the mountain;1184311]Rasmussen relies heavily on landline calls for polling so their cross-reference of a community tends to be just what old people think.[/quote]
That's interesting. I have always looked at Rasmussen as fairly reliable. Matty, I just found it interesting. Even in the Rasmussen poll the hate factor is incredibly high at 44% who strongly disapprove. So clearly the 46/53 isn't an amazing big time best ever poll - though once it hits Fox's headlines I am sure Trump will trumpet it and CNN will poo poo it. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=mooby;1184297]Right, which is why she asked Vanity Fair to share that video advising her what to do in 2018.
Am I the only one who couldn't give less of a shit about a weak joke?[/quote] Well I’m saying I agree with mag article...move on. But Hillary’s re-emergence over the last several months has hurt the dems. But really, who is the leader of the Democratic Party? The vacuum filler shouldn’t be Hillary. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.