Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   We've got big trouble on the OL. (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=48573)

Paintrain 08-08-2012 04:25 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=CultBrennan59;929409]I'm kind of surprised he isn't starting the first preseason game for us..as in over Gettis..[/quote]

He's a LG, Gettis is a RG. Different footwork, responsibilities, etc. He will get plenty of reps out there with Hurt running with the starters.

CultBrennan59 08-08-2012 05:35 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=Paintrain;929411]He's a LG, Gettis is a RG. Different footwork, responsibilities, etc. He will get plenty of reps out there with Hurt running with the starters.[/quote]

really. I see a major difference between a Guard and a Center or a Guard and a tackle, hell I see the major difference between a LT and a RT, but is there really a difference between a LG and a RG? I say the only difference is the side your on. Please tell me how much differently they are cause I don't buy it. I'm giving that a Seth Meyers Really?!?

30gut 08-08-2012 06:02 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=CultBrennan59;929409]I'm kind of surprised he isn't starting the first preseason game for us..as in over Gettis..[/quote]Huh, *shrugs* I didn't even know Gettis was starting.

punch it in 08-08-2012 07:40 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=CultBrennan59;929435]really. I see a major difference between a Guard and a Center or a Guard and a tackle, hell I see the major difference between a LT and a RT, but is there really a difference between a LG and a RG? I say the only difference is the side your on. Please tell me how much differently they are cause I don't buy it. I'm giving that a Seth Meyers Really?!?[/quote]

Im going to say that there are two reasons why someone would be better suited playing one or the other.........
first - i think it depends on who you are playing next to, like if the LT is the dominant force on the line you may want to put a certain individual at LG if he is a weak link - so that way you dont have a right side that is totally vulnerable.
second - unless everyone is pulling right or left on a certain play it might be difficult for a right gaurd who is used to going forward and right to go forward and left - the footwork is all different and the direction - like a right handed person throwing left handed ,,,that being said I think most gaurds can change sides if need be -

RGIII 08-08-2012 08:40 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
Would anyone liked to have seen the Skins make the move the Chargers made to solidify depth for their OL?

[url=http://www.chargers.com/news/press-releases/article-1/Chargers-Sign-Davis-and-Toudouze/33f4f943-aa97-4c0a-9e59-357ca90ba67a]Chargers Sign Davis and Toudouze[/url]

Lotus 08-08-2012 08:43 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=RGIII;929460]Would anyone liked to have seen the Skins make the move the Chargers made to solidify depth for their OL?

[url=http://www.chargers.com/news/press-releases/article-1/Chargers-Sign-Davis-and-Toudouze/33f4f943-aa97-4c0a-9e59-357ca90ba67a]Chargers Sign Davis and Toudouze[/url][/quote]

I would say, "Who cares?" But since they are both former Tuskers, obviously the Chargers got two steals.

RGIII 08-08-2012 08:53 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=Lotus;929463]I would say, "Who cares?" But since they are both former Tuskers, obviously the Chargers got two steals.[/quote]

Haslett coached the Tuskers a year or two I believe. One would think either of these guys would be a better option than Black. Just throwing this out there for discussion that's all. I think it speaks volumes for the talent pool for quality OTs. Wondering if team explores all avenues.

punch it in 08-08-2012 09:01 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
Im all for signing and exploring depth, etc. However I would much rather go with young draftpicks than old veterans that spent the majority of their career in the UFL - Oh and who is the "Black" you are referring to?

RGIII 08-08-2012 09:06 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=punch it in;929466]Im all for signing and exploring depth, etc. However I would much rather go with young draftpicks than old veterans that spent the majority of their career in the UFL - Oh and who is the "Black" you are referring to?[/quote]

Jordan Black. I'm with you on the draft picks whichever round they were drafted.

punch it in 08-08-2012 09:12 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
Flew under my radar - I would have to agree with you on him not being a good option - if for no other reason than I never heard of him. lol - I want to call him camp fodder but if we keep dropping like flies on the line who the hell knows?

punch it in 08-08-2012 09:15 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=RGIII;929467]Jordan Black. I'm with you on the draft picks wherever round they were drafted.[/quote]

Yeah , at least Shanny can mold them young and teach them our scheme - I think Gettis is going to be a solid player - thought that when we drafted him - Iowa is like an o-line breeding ground.

Skins4L 08-08-2012 11:40 PM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
Montgomery is a backup at best and we started this guy all last year.

Man im glad our QB had the wheels to dodge danger and believe me thats what hell be doing alot this year.. NEXT YEAR well address this bigtime. I really hope they can get theyre act together and protect.

CultBrennan59 08-09-2012 12:24 AM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=Skins4L;929496]Montgomery is a backup at best and we started this guy all last year.

Man im glad our QB had the wheels to dodge danger and believe me thats what hell be doing alot this year.. NEXT YEAR well address this bigtime. I really hope they can get theyre act together and protect.[/quote]

Montgomery was considered to be one of the leagues better centers. I remember seeing him ranked as the #16 best center in the NFL out of 32. RT is the biggest problem on this team by far.

ethat001 08-09-2012 01:39 AM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=CultBrennan59;929498]Montgomery was considered to be one of the leagues better centers. I remember seeing him ranked as the #16 best center in the NFL out of 32. RT is the biggest problem on this team by far.[/quote]

#16 out of 32 says "exactly average" to me, not necessarily "leagues better centers", but I get your point..

As far as Davis and Toudouze -- would they have fit into the zone blocking system? I'm guessing Shanny / Allen know about all the O-linemen out there and passed on these, and I'd trust them.

REDSKINS4ever 08-09-2012 02:46 AM

Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
 
[quote=CultBrennan59;929498]Montgomery was considered to be one of the leagues better centers. I remember seeing him ranked as the #16 best center in the NFL out of 32. RT is the biggest problem on this team by far.[/quote]

I've heard that before too. But I've also heard that Montgomery is the Selvish Capers of centers in the NFL. Will Montgomery was a seventh round draft choice. He was never heralded as a good or very good center. He plays the position and that's all you can ask of him. But he's not Jeff Saturday or Mangold.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.80958 seconds with 9 queries