Re: Media Bias
 

Dang it giant ... I'm not trying to spend hours reading up on this. It's much easier for me to look from a distance and just claim anyone claiming there is some secret Marxist organized movement as tin foil hat stuff.

I must admit my initial defensive thoughts are that I don't think the mass majority of everyday people protesting are card carrying Marxist members.

Do I care enough to dig deep in this? I honestly don't know if I do.

I feel like my response to you is not an adequate one and I apologize

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1255932]Black Lives Matter the saying - Couldn't agree more.

BLM Organization = 100% fucking scam job. Isn't about black lives at all. It's a political organization. People need to read into its founders and the organization's goals, mission statement, etc.[/quote]

But hasn't the protests and movement moved to an organic approach? As in i don't think all the protestors meet before hand and agree to their platform and positions then fledge loyalty to lenin.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1255934]Dang it giant ... I'm not trying to spend hours reading up on this. It's much easier for me to look from a distance and just claim anyone claiming there is some secret Marxist organized movement as tin foil hat stuff.

I must admit my initial defensive thoughts are that I don't think the mass majority of everyday people protesting are card carrying Marxist members.

Do I care enough to dig deep in this? I honestly don't know if I do.

I feel like my response to you is not an adequate one and I apologize[/quote]

FFS man, BLM -the political org- is absolute trash run by trash people. Their mission statement or charter is filled with Marxist and anti American sentiment. I don’t know why you require everyone to read it too you or explain it? There is more than enough out there that can help you...You are a smart guy but at this point you are arguing in bad faith.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1255935]But hasn't the protests and movement moved to an organic approach? As in i don't think all the protestors meet before hand and agree to their platform and positions then fledge loyalty to lenin.[/quote]

I don't think every protester is necessarily a member of the organization. But if you support the organization or are a member of it, then you are supporting its agenda whether outright or through ignorance.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1255935]But hasn't the protests and movement moved to an organic approach? As in i don't think all the protestors meet before hand and agree to their platform and positions then fledge loyalty to lenin.[/quote] I don't mean to be offensive, but you're obviously a very ignorant man with very little understanding of the world. There is nothing organic about the BLM protesters or the movement. Even the term, "black lives matter" is based on a false narrative. The BLM protesters are being led to believe that black men are being targeted by white police officers for brutality. There is no evidence of that. Not to say that black men don't experience police brutality. We absolutely do just like other races of men and women in this country. White people get beat up, shot, and killed by the police more than black people. No matter if the officer is black or white no one assumes race played any part in these incidents. Any time we see a white officer and black male the assumption is that the white officer's behavior was motivated by race even if there is no evidence of that being the case. The black man is assumed to be a victim and the cop is assumed to be in the wrong regardless of the circumstances. There lies the problem. People no longer care about facts. It's all about feeding their internal bias regardless of the facts. So how can this movement have any merit when it's built on a false narrative?

The BLM organization is nothing more than a DNC shell company. It is nothing about their mission statement that says anything about improving the lives of black people. They don't give a shit about the black family and made that blantantly clear. Black men, women, and children are being butchered in the streets by other black people. Yet you hear nothing from BLM. If it's not a white person or a police officer killing a black person. BLM could care less about a black life. They don't care about black safety, employement, living conditions, literacy, business ownership, home ownership, etc. Only a fucking moron would think that these people have the best interest of black people at heart.

Re: Media Bias
 

Just imagine how the media would be covering the riots in Portland and Seattle if these folks were the “end the lockdown” protesters acting like this in Detroit?

Media is the enemy of people plain and simple

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1256045]Just imagine how the media would be covering the riots in Portland and Seattle if these folks were the “end the lockdown” protesters acting like this in Detroit?

Media is the enemy of people plain and simple[/quote]

Nope,ignorance and lack of education is the enemy of the people .

Re: Media Bias
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1256045]Just imagine how the media would be covering the riots in Portland and Seattle if these folks were the “end the lockdown” protesters acting like this in Detroit?



Media is the enemy of people plain and simple[/QUOTE]



Lawd...he has truly brainwashed you.

Re: Media Bias
 

[url]https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-settles-nicholas-sandmann-defamation-lawsuit-in-covington-catholic-high-school-controversy[/url]

Washington Post settles Nicholas Sandmann defamation lawsuit in Covington Catholic High School controversy


CNN and Washington Post down....4 more to go

Looks like Nick sent a threat to Jack Dorsey of Twitter. Would be great to see a social media Precedent

Re: Media Bias
 

chico , this song for you!!!!!!!!!!!!




[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=18&v=CFy4hB8EnVU&feature=emb_logo[/url]

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1256361][url]https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-settles-nicholas-sandmann-defamation-lawsuit-in-covington-catholic-high-school-controversy[/url]

Washington Post settles Nicholas Sandmann defamation lawsuit in Covington Catholic High School controversy


CNN and Washington Post down....4 more to go

Looks like Nick sent a threat to Jack Dorsey of Twitter. Would be great to see a social media Precedent[/quote]

[url]https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/nicholas-sandmann-lawyer-accuses-cnn-230539071.html[/url]

Re: Media Bias
 

Great video and common sense, chico try it.


[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=220&v=ZdtYyqn5pI4&feature=emb_logo[/url]

Re: Media Bias
 

I'm shocked, shocked I say, that Biden is treated differently.

Keep those heads buried in the sand.

[url]https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-town-hall-panned-for-softball-questions-for-biden[/url]

Re: Media Bias
 

“Walker was Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend—he was also supposedly a drug dealer,” Carlson declared. “That was one of the reasons the police were there. Walker admits that he fired first and that he shot a police officer.”

Walker, however, was nowhere to be found on any of the series of warrants that were served by police, including the “no-knock” warrant on Taylor’s apartment by three plainclothes policemen. Taylor’s ex-boyfriend, Jemarcus Glover, was the subject of the investigation by Louisville police, while Walker has no drug offenses to his name.

Towards the end of his program, however, Carlson issued an on-air correction about how he described Walker, insisting he “inadvertently” mixed up Walker and Glover.

“We made a mistake at the top of the show and we want to correct it, as we always do,” the Fox News host stated. “We flipped the names around of a couple people inadvertently. We said police believed Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend was a drug dealer—he might have been. We meant to say her ex-boyfriend. We wanted to correct that, sorry.”
[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/tucker-accuses-blm-lying-breonna-022435260.html[/url]

So now should Tucker Carlson and Fox News be sued for defamation? Isnt Cardi B being sued for defamation for calling a Trump supporter racist?

I personally dont think so but I dont think any of these "defamation" lawsuits should be filed, its getting ridiculous with all these petty "defamation" lawsuits.

Re: Media Bias
 

[url]https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5f6b3565c5b629afbe990c15/amp?__twitter_impression=true[/url]


“The Death Of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Pushed Me To Join The Satanic Temple“

Lol...not satire, this is serious. People questioning this isn’t a cult-like, cosplay with RBG? GTFO

Just trash huffpost

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1259925][url]https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5f6b3565c5b629afbe990c15/amp?__twitter_impression=true[/url]


“The Death Of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Pushed Me To Join The Satanic Temple“

Lol...not satire, this is serious. People questioning this isn’t a cult-like, cosplay with RBG? GTFO

Just trash huffpost[/quote]

yeah that's not a hard news article it's from the Huffpost Personal section, just basically personal essays submitted by readers

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=MTK;1259927]yeah that's not a hard news article it's from the Huffpost Personal section, just basically personal essays submitted by readers[/quote]

1. This is their readership

2. This is relevant based on editors discretion to publish it? Meaning the paper/website has buy in when it publishes trash like this. It’s disgraceful as it is laughable

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1259931]1. This is their readership

2. This is relevant based on editors discretion to publish it? Meaning the paper/website has buy in when it publishes trash like this. It’s disgraceful as it is laughable[/quote]

So is what trump says and does but that doesn't seem to bother you ,wonder why?

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1259922]“Walker was Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend—he was also supposedly a drug dealer,” Carlson declared. “That was one of the reasons the police were there. Walker admits that he fired first and that he shot a police officer.”

Walker, however, was nowhere to be found on any of the series of warrants that were served by police, including the “no-knock” warrant on Taylor’s apartment by three plainclothes policemen. Taylor’s ex-boyfriend, Jemarcus Glover, was the subject of the investigation by Louisville police, while Walker has no drug offenses to his name.

Towards the end of his program, however, Carlson issued an on-air correction about how he described Walker, insisting he “inadvertently” mixed up Walker and Glover.

“We made a mistake at the top of the show and we want to correct it, as we always do,” the Fox News host stated. “We flipped the names around of a couple people inadvertently. We said police believed Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend was a drug dealer—[B]he might have been. [/B]We meant to say her ex-boyfriend. We wanted to correct that, sorry.”
[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/tucker-accuses-blm-lying-breonna-022435260.html[/url]

So now should Tucker Carlson and Fox News be sued for defamation? Isnt Cardi B being sued for defamation for calling a Trump supporter racist?

I personally dont think so but I dont think any of these "defamation" lawsuits should be filed, its getting ridiculous with all these petty "defamation" lawsuits.[/quote]

1. So unnecessary to add that part.

2. I had to take a law class in college. I'll always remember this: You can sue anyone for anything. Doesn't mean you'll win. People use lawsuits way too often. It's rather embarrassing. Don't care who does it.

Re: Media Bias
 

Wish I had more to give, but I'll match anyone(s) donation up to $250.

Trying to use media to do some good here. Watching Carlson and Mr. Woodson was on the show last night. He comes off as very believable on trying to help under-represented communities.

[url]https://woodsoncenter.org/team_members/robert-l-woodson-sr/[/url]

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1259948]1. So unnecessary to add that part.

2. [B]I had to take a law class in college. I'll always remember this: You can sue anyone for anything. Doesn't mean you'll win. People use lawsuits way too often. It's rather embarrassing. Don't care who does it[/B].[/quote]

I think we could both agree all the states that don't have pre-trial standards of evidence (to prevent frivolous lawsuits specifically designed to hurt innocent people's pockets) need to pass laws that will throw out lawsuits like those. I believe it was John Oliver who did a special on it:

[yt]UN8bJb8biZU[/yt]

Re: Media Bias
 

Refreshing to hear logical thought and reasoning from Charles Barkley and Shaq...

When I actually read the evidence of Taylor death, I couldn’t believe the media and BLM had lied they entire time about this case. It’s tragic, but police knocking and announced they were at the door and receive gun shots...you fucked up big time

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1259959]Refreshing to hear logical thought and reasoning from Charles Barkley and Shaq...

When I actually read the evidence of Taylor death, I couldn’t believe the media and BLM had lied they entire time about this case. It’s tragic, but police knocking and announced they were at the door and receive gun shots...you fucked up big time[/quote]

I agree with what Shaq and Barkley said but you do have some facts wrong. It was a no knock warrant so there was no announcement. To me it is frustrating that we have a situation in which an innocent person was killed and there is no accountability. This probably needs to go into police reform but the habits that we view as acceptable police practices need to change. It puts our police in bad situations that are easily avoidable. Serving no knock warrants at 1:00 am in states where they have castle defense laws in place, serving no knock warrants at residents where a law abiding registered gun holder is sleeping. These are all avoidable and should be policy and Taylor would be alive. We would never tolerate a teacher working one on one with a student after school, or a surgeon being on call for 72 hours but for some reason this is viewed as acceptable in police departments.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1259991]I agree with what Shaq and Barkley said but you do have some facts wrong.[B] It was a no knock warrant so there was no announcement.[/B] To me it is frustrating that we have a situation in which an innocent person was killed and there is no accountability. This probably needs to go into police reform but the habits that we view as acceptable police practices need to change. It puts our police in bad situations that are easily avoidable. Serving no knock warrants at 1:00 am in states where they have castle defense laws in place, serving no knock warrants at residents where a law abiding registered gun holder is sleeping. These are all avoidable and should be policy and Taylor would be alive. We would never tolerate a teacher working one on one with a student after school, or a surgeon being on call for 72 hours but for some reason this is viewed as acceptable in police departments.[/quote]


This is the problem and where the public (including myself) has been mislead. Neighbor has submitted under witness testimony that they heard the police announce themselves. Also the police did knock...Kenneth Walker admitted he heard knocking 30-45 seconds. Finally, people keep saying Taylor was killed in her sleep, this is not true, it’s been confirmed she was awake.

I had been under the impression, the police didn’t announce, knock and came in the door looking to execute the warrant. Also I’d heard many time Taylor was asleep. The media has again failed us, wanting to provide a false narrative to support a side. It’s as dangerous as bad police work.

I don’t have answers too why there is extremely shoddy police work or why they chose 12:53 am...it’s disturbing. I hope changes will be made.

Re: Media Bias
 

[url]https://www.dailywire.com/news/nbc-portrayed-voters-at-biden-town-hall-as-undecided-a-deeper-look-paints-a-different-picture[/url]

NBC Portrayed Voters At Biden Town Hall As ‘Undecided.’ A Deeper Look Paints A Different Picture.


JFC...NBC is bullshit propaganda. Blatant dishonesty yet again.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1259991]I agree with what Shaq and Barkley said but you do have some facts wrong. It was a no knock warrant so there was no announcement. To me it is frustrating that we have a situation in which an innocent person was killed and there is no accountability. This probably needs to go into police reform but the habits that we view as acceptable police practices need to change. It puts our police in bad situations that are easily avoidable. Serving no knock warrants at 1:00 am in states where they have castle defense laws in place, serving no knock warrants at residents where a law abiding registered gun holder is sleeping. These are all avoidable and should be policy and Taylor would be alive. We would never tolerate a teacher working one on one with a student after school, or a surgeon being on call for 72 hours but for some reason this is viewed as acceptable in police departments.[/quote]


I just don't understand why the 2A supporters and/or the NRA don't step up. Intruders burst in the home at 1 am and a gun owner defends themselves, this is literally every 2a supporter's wet dream.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1259998]This is the problem and where the public (including myself) has been mislead. Neighbor has submitted under witness testimony that they heard the police announce themselves. Also the police did knock...Kenneth Walker admitted he heard knocking 30-45 seconds. Finally, people keep saying Taylor was killed in her sleep, this is not true, it’s been confirmed she was awake.

I had been under the impression, the police didn’t announce, knock and came in the door looking to execute the warrant. Also I’d heard many time Taylor was asleep. The media has again failed us, wanting to provide a false narrative to support a side. It’s as dangerous as bad police work.

I don’t have answers too why there is extremely shoddy police work or why they chose 12:53 am...it’s disturbing. I hope changes will be made.[/quote]

Body cameras not being on during a no-knock search warrant is inexcusable. That is a huge red flag.

No knock warrant reform is something I think most americans can agree on. I wouldnt make a total ban on them bc there are some bad armed people out there but I would require surveillance to confirm the target is actually at the location before a no-knock warrant can be executed. Judges need to stop signing off on search warrants like its candy.

I actually spent a year reviewing search warrant applications in Montgomery County and they all got signed off on.

In Breona's case, their target had moved out months prior .. all the police had to do was a little bit of surveillance to confirm.

No knock warrants can effect anyone. I had a case where the swat team executed a no knock warrant on like 6701 Street when it was supposed to be 6710 Street. Grandmother shot, she lived. I switched firms before the case was resolved but i imagine qualified immunity as the police were acting under "good faith" but made an accident

Re: Media Bias
 

The biggest red flag is this, after the Kentucky AG did something never/rarely done...released grand jury evidence including recordings (!) last Friday....the story has fallen off the map.

Why?

Because the evidence proves the narratives were false. The warrant may have been a no-knock, it was not treated as a no knock. Even the pre-meeting police sheet they stated and did not check the box as no knock. Testimony...neighbor heard the police announcement, and the guy who shot the police officer testified he heard the police knocking 45 seconds to 1 minute.

I know we are grasping for anything now as BLM and the media lied for months over the facts

Re: Media Bias
 

The biggest red flag is that a young INNOCENT woman was shot dead in her home because of a police mistake.

You hammer the media bias narrative but if the police had activated their body cameras there would be no guessing as to what happened.

KY AG only released some of the GJ stuff because he said after the lone indictment that the GJ also decided no charges for murder were correct.

That comment prompted a grand juror to say "whoa .. were were never given the option to indict the officers who shot and killed Breona. The only indictment we were asked to decide on was for shooting into the neighbors apartment".

----

The most important point is that an innocent woman was killed by sloppy police work. Chico, I think you would agree with that.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1261614]The biggest red flag is that a young INNOCENT woman was shot dead in her home because of a police mistake.

You hammer the media bias narrative but if the police had activated their body cameras there would be no guessing as to what happened.

KY AG only released some of the GJ stuff because he said after the lone indictment that the GJ also decided no charges for murder were correct.

That comment prompted a grand juror to say "whoa .. were were never given the option to indict the officers who shot and killed Breona. The only indictment we were asked to decide on was for shooting into the neighbors apartment".

----

The most important point is that an innocent woman was killed by sloppy police work. Chico, I think you would agree with that.[/quote]

I would agree with sloppy police work if you agree the media and BLM lied repeatedly about the facts of the case in order to push a false narrative.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1261620]I would agree with sloppy police work if you agree the media and BLM lied repeatedly about the facts of the case in order to push a false narrative.[/quote]

lol .. why does acknowledging the truth of the matter require a conditional add-on? Are we negotiating over whether Breona Taylor deserved to die? Acknowledging that should be a given, no matter where you sit on political spectrum.

I honestly have not followed the media description of this case closely so I dont feel like I know enough to make a judgment call on it. I will say the "she was shot and killed in bed" was false but where did that first come from? Where ever it came from, it certainly resonated in the echo chamber of social media and was amplified. I personally thought and assumed she was killed in her bed.

I think we can agree on 4 things:

1. Sloppy police work led to an innocent womans death
2. Search warrants need to be tightened up and executed better
3. Police body cameras should be activated at all times. This is inexcusable
4. Breona Taylor was not in her bed when she was shot and killed by police

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1261627]lol .. why does acknowledging the truth of the matter require a conditional add-on? Are we negotiating over whether Breona Taylor deserved to die? Acknowledging that should be a given, no matter where you sit on political spectrum.

I honestly have not followed the media description of this case closely so I dont feel like I know enough to make a judgment call on it. I will say the "she was shot and killed in bed" was false but where did that first come from? Where ever it came from, it certainly resonated in the echo chamber of social media and was amplified. I personally thought and assumed she was killed in her bed.

I think we can agree on 4 things:

1. Sloppy police work led to an innocent womans death
2. Search warrants need to be tightened up and executed better
[B]3. Police body cameras should be activated at all times. This is inexcusable [/B]
4. Breona Taylor was not in her bed when she was shot and killed by police[/quote]

Especially when it comes to search warrants. Officers are entering one of the most potentially dangerous situations when it comes to their safety, search warrants and dv calls should be always-on scenarios.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1261627]lol .. why does acknowledging the truth of the matter require a conditional add-on? Are we negotiating over whether Breona Taylor deserved to die? Acknowledging that should be a given, no matter where you sit on political spectrum.

I honestly have not followed the media description of this case closely so I dont feel like I know enough to make a judgment call on it. I will say the "she was shot and killed in bed" was false but where did that first come from? Where ever it came from, it certainly resonated in the echo chamber of social media and was amplified. I personally thought and assumed she was killed in her bed.

I think we can agree on 4 things:

1. Sloppy police work led to an innocent womans death
2. Search warrants need to be tightened up and executed better
3. Police body cameras should be activated at all times. This is inexcusable
4. Breona Taylor was not in her bed when she was shot and killed by police[/quote]

No. the media lied, BLM lied, and even the family’s Attorny lied in May about the case. They distorted the facts, lied, painted a false picture of Taylor, painted a false picture of the police, avoided critical facts, was biased in reporting to support a false narrative about the police.

If you can’t agree you that, then fuck off

MSNBC still has this headline up on Facebook:

Breonna Taylor, a black EMT worker, was shot and killed as she slept in her home after police officers “blindly fired” after executing a search warrant at the wrong home in Louisville, Kentucky, a lawsuit says.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=mooby;1261633]Especially when it comes to search warrants. Officers are entering one of the most potentially dangerous situations when it comes to their safety, search warrants and dv calls should be always-on scenarios.[/quote]

Look, we aren’t talking about Breanna Taylor because of shoddy police work, body cameras, search warrants, etc

We are talking about her because the country was told the police barged in her residence without announcing themselves and started firing their weapons without cause, killing an innocent, EMT-working young black woman in her sleep.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1261634]No. the media lied, BLM lied, and even the family’s Attorny lied in May about the case. They distorted the facts, lied, painted a false picture of Taylor, painted a false picture of the police, avoided critical facts, was biased in reporting to support a false narrative about the police.

If you can’t agree you that, then fuck off[/quote]

Right wingers focusing on minut peripheral matters to distract or downplay the undeniable fact that an innocent woman was killed by the police is why people say "Black Lives Matter".

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1261645]Right wingers focusing on [B]minut peripheral[/B] matters to distract or downplay the undeniable fact that an innocent woman was killed by the police is why people say "Black Lives Matter".[/quote]

In other words, critical facts

I’m not celebrating this discovery of facts, and especially the outcome where an innocent life was killed. But to ignore how this shit is packaged and sold to the American people is unacceptable, it’s purposely dividing people...and if u don’t acknowledge it, shame on you.

Re: Media Bias
 

Interesting. I thought you valued human life .... I guess you are pro-choice then, to a certain extent. We have a lot in common, we just need to talk and learn more. Im pro-choice, youre pro-choice. Im for police reform - youre for some police reform. We'll work on it, youll come around.

I feel good about this.

I am even going to forgive you for telling me to fuck off earlier. Clearly it was a misunderstanding and we worked through it.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=SunnySide;1261654]Interesting. I thought you valued human life .... I guess you are pro-choice then, to a certain extent. We have a lot in common, we just need to talk and learn more. Im pro-choice, youre pro-choice. Im for police reform - youre for some police reform. We'll work on it, youll come around.

I feel good about this.

I am even going to forgive you for telling me to fuck off earlier. Clearly it was a misunderstanding and we worked through it.[/quote]

Ha...you know you are correct as this whole exercise is too argue over points we disagree and to highlight them, but the fact of the matter is we most likely agree on a majority of issue. But that’s boring right?

It’s kinda like the Supreme Court vacancy exercise, I remember reading when Kavenaugh got the seat...he and merrick Garland aligned something like 92%-93% of the time on decisions. So the assumptions they were drastically apart on how law is applied, not really true.

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=Chico23231;1261640]Look, we aren’t talking about Breanna Taylor because of shoddy police work, body cameras, search warrants, etc

We are talking about her because the country was told the police barged in her residence without announcing themselves and started firing their weapons without cause, killing an innocent, EMT-working young black woman in her sleep.[/quote]

I thought we were talking about Breonna Taylor because she didn't deserve to be shot to death in her own home?

Re: Media Bias
 

[quote=mooby;1261659]I thought we were talking about Breonna Taylor because she didn't deserve to be shot to death in her own home?[/quote]

I definitely wish her boyfriend wouldn’t have started shootings and shot the officer. And I wish the officers wouldn’t have returned fire killing Breanna.