![]() |
Re: Media Bias
Republicans always got more heat for members improprieties. Because, hello, they were supposed to be the party of "family values". Same for the Catholic Church. Liberals and the media loved raking both entities over the coals, even though there were plenty of liberal examples too.
Now that Hollywood and liberals have fallen short on their own standard of "Rape Culture" and sexual harassment, in a massive way, they don't get to legitimately say it's a "bipartisan issue" now. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1180819]Ohhhh, I see, so becuase you think he isn't going to win you don't need to bitch about him as much as you bitch about the others or is it just his political affiliation?[/quote]
How about this - Roy Moore should go, Al Franken should go, Conyers should go, and this House 'slush/hush money' should go. Care to agree (or does political affiliation matter more)???? |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=btfoom;1181214]How about this - Roy Moore should go, Al Franken should go, Conyers should go, and this House 'slush/hush money' should go.
Care to agree (or does political affiliation matter more)????[/quote] Why aren't you including trump in your mandate? |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=HailGreen28;1181202]Republicans always got more heat for members improprieties. Because, hello, they were supposed to be the party of "family values". Same for the Catholic Church. Liberals and the media loved raking both entities over the coals, even though there were plenty of liberal examples too.
Now that Hollywood and liberals have fallen short on their own standard of "Rape Culture" and sexual harassment, in a massive way, they don't get to legitimately say it's a "bipartisan issue" now.[/quote] They aren't it's always been "a bipartisan issue" just now the GOP is getting caught and trying to blame the MSM for it and not taking responsibility for their own actions. |
Re: Media Bias
[url=http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic-%e2%80%94-and-false-%e2%80%94-tale-about-roy-moore-she-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/ar-BBFQkBq?li=BBnb7Kz]A woman approached The Post with dramatic — and false — tale about Roy Moore. She appears to be part of undercover sting operation.[/url]
Lol, if I could ask this lady one question, it would be: How is this campaign to discredit the liberal MSM coming? |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=mooby;1181360][url=http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic-%e2%80%94-and-false-%e2%80%94-tale-about-roy-moore-she-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/ar-BBFQkBq?li=BBnb7Kz]A woman approached The Post with dramatic — and false — tale about Roy Moore. She appears to be part of undercover sting operation.[/url]
Lol, if I could ask this lady one question, it would be: How is this campaign to discredit the liberal MSM coming?[/quote] Hilarity... |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=mooby;1181360][url=http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic-%e2%80%94-and-false-%e2%80%94-tale-about-roy-moore-she-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/ar-BBFQkBq?li=BBnb7Kz]A woman approached The Post with dramatic — and false — tale about Roy Moore. She appears to be part of undercover sting operation.[/url]
Lol, if I could ask this lady one question, it would be: How is this campaign to discredit the liberal MSM coming?[/quote] Got to love the GOP.When there is no story,make it up. |
Re: Media Bias
[B][B]CNN[/B][/B] and Anderson Cooper do a great job in showing just what a Liar in Chief trump is.Keep blaming MSM for pointing out what an idiot the president is.
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJRdftvtfoc[/url] |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1181372][B][B]CNN[/B][/B] and Anderson Cooper do a great job in showing just what a Liar in Chief trump is.Keep blaming MSM for pointing out what an idiot the president is.
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJRdftvtfoc[/url][/quote] Anderson Cooper = Sean Hannity. Its allll the same song. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=HailGreen28;1181202]Republicans always got more heat for members improprieties. Because, hello, they were supposed to be the party of "family values". Same for the Catholic Church. Liberals and the media loved raking both entities over the coals, even though there were plenty of liberal examples too.
Now that Hollywood and liberals have fallen short on their own standard of "Rape Culture" and sexual harassment, in a massive way, they don't get to legitimately say it's a "bipartisan issue" now.[/quote] The Hollywood institutionalized sexism AND sexual harassment/rape cultural....there is no coming back from that. Their decades long hypocrisy is well documented. Its over for them with any type of influence on this county. |
Re: Media Bias
Matt Lauer...oh boy, say it ain’t so. Another big liberal bites the dust...
Make no mistake, like Weinstein, Charlie Rose, and O’Reily, this went on for years and many people within NBC knew. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1181432]Matt Lauer...oh boy, say it ain’t so. Another big liberal bites the dust...
Make no mistake, like Weinstein, Charlie Rose, and O’Reily, this went on for years and many people within NBC knew.[/quote] Chico ,please provide facts to your accusations?I'll wait. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1181437]Chico ,please provide facts to your accusations?I'll wait.[/quote]
Accusations? Lauer was fired on facts G-1. Everyone wants to know the story, but NBC is currently deleting emails and shredding documents...cause they don't want the story out. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1181440]Accusations? Lauer was fired on facts G-1. Everyone wants to know the story, but NBC is currently deleting emails and shredding documents...cause they don't want the story out.[/quote]
Again I will ask for facts on those accusations,how do you know or are you making things up again? |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1181443]Again I will ask for facts on those accusations,how do you know or are you making things up again?[/quote]
“While it is the first complaint about his behavior in the over 20 years he’s been at NBC News, we were also presented with reason to believe this may not have been an isolated incident.” Put your thinking cap on...this statement is extremely poorly worded...16 year old written...lol specifically worded for one thing. [url]https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/business/media/nbc-matt-lauer.html[/url] Now go to the comment section and read the sexual harrassment apologists for lauer and nbc. The hypocrisy in the liberal media frightening. update: Here comes the trickle G-1: According to a handful of journalists on Twitter, multiple outlets had been working on exposing Lauer's behavior for months. Elizabeth Wagmeister of Variety, Yashar Ali of HuffPost and the New York Times were all reportedly working on exposés that would've ultimately shed light on the former "Today" anchor's past. And, Ali alleges, "some top executives at NBC were aware of these stories." "I, and other reporters, have been aware of several women who have come forward privately in the past few months," he continued. "Even before Weinstein. They weren't willing to go public though...they were terrified of Matt. Matt Lauer put the fear of God into these women. He had relationships with reporters outside NBC that he cultivated just for this purpose. They knew that." "Lauer is among the worst I've heard about," Ali added. "Not in terms of the kind of misconduct but the way in which he manipulated these women into silence. It's evil, frightening stuff." everyone fucking knew... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.