Re: Sally Jenkins' Best article yet
 

ITS FOR THE PEOPLE RUN BY THE PEOPLE!

What good is a fan site with no fans to discuss the Skins?

Re: Sally Jenkins' Best article yet
 

[QUOTE=Beemnseven;414650]The frantic defense of Lil' Danny and his 50-62 record is quite comical.[/QUOTE]

Especially when you consider how many interceptions he's thrown. Or all of the tackles he's missed.

Re: Sally Jenkins' Best article yet
 

[quote=QBall;414937]ITS FOR THE PEOPLE RUN BY THE PEOPLE!

What good is a fan site with no fans to discuss the Skins?[/quote]
I agree it's "for the people". But I'm curious how many hours of admin time have you put in? How much of the server cost did you pay for? How much of your money supports the site? I'll bet it's the same as me, none, none & none. This site is certainly not "run by the people".

I'm sure this site won't shut down because some folks posting one liners that show no rational thought cease to post or visit the site.

Re: Sally Jenkins' Best article yet
 

[QUOTE=Longtimefan;414636]If it bothers us so much that others in the media world are always being so critical of Dan Snyder and our beloved Redskins, then we must be reminded of the fact that "charitty starts at home". I'm pretty sure Snyder does not visit fan forums but there probably are some media types that do, and take their cue from us.......[and say]

We find it truly amazing how some Redskins fans can be so critical of their owner, and the method in which he operates, yet find it offensive when others outside the organization echo the same sentiments, and when they do, the backlash is on.

Shortly, someone will start a new thread complaining about how & why the media is always spinning bad tidings about the Redskins.[/QUOTE]

Great post and well put. My sentiments precisely.

Re: Sally Jenkins' Best article yet
 

[QUOTE=Slingin Sammy 33;414946]I agree it's "for the people". But I'm curious how many hours of admin time have you put in? How much of the server cost did you pay for? How much of your money supports the site? I'll bet it's the same as me, none, none & none. This site is certainly not "run by the people".

I'm sure this site won't shut down because some folks posting one liners that show no rational thought cease to post or visit the site.[/QUOTE]

That's true. Definately a great luxury to have a site like this one. But its really run by the visitors who come and members who post.

I didn't mean "run" like watering the trees.

Re: Sally Jenkins' Best article yet
 

[quote=QBall;414914]How can you compare her to some people starting threads?

I still dont' see what was so wrong with Joe Gibbs 3.0.

It sure as heck is better than Sally's crap![/quote]

Be real. Its very simple.

Some, NOT all threads get started with very little thought the Joe Gibbs 3.0 is a prime example it makes absolutely NO SENSE. Who in there right mind would think Joe is coming back to coach for crying out loud, HE JUST RETIRED!

The comparison is very simple for most to see she puts about the same amount of pre thought into her articles. Very little to none, and if any thinking could possibly come out of her shallow mind..? It would be Anti-Redskin.

Re: Sally Jenkins' Best article yet
 

[quote=DynamiteRave;414607]Come on, she compared Snyder to a little boy. While I don't agree with how Snyder is running the Skins like a circus, I do assume he's at least TRYING to do what he thinks is right for the team (and Im neutral on whether what he's doing is wrong or right).

Sally Jenkins really needs to be put in a burlap bag and beaten for a while. I can't respect anyone's opinion who gets their jollies (and their paycheck) by crapping on the local team, IN the mother-loving local paper.

Whatevs.[/quote]

......well he's no Al Davis.:goodjob: