Re: Walt Harris
 

my point ts every week its a team effort win or lose you cant cut everybody who plays poorly on any given week.The defense as a whole didnt play well enough to win.no sacks no ints.made simms into a probowler today.

Re: Walt Harris
 

[QUOTE=sniks]here we go again ramsey, jimoh, royal,harris let them go? everytime we lose a game we have to cut somebody?Come on fellas we just stink.Tos, big plays on def.and only 1 decent receiver.[/QUOTE]

Obviously you don't know this team because for the second week Moss has not been the key player in the game. Cooley and Sellers are not decent receivers? With pass protection, Brunell will make the play. This team is far from a suck-ass team. We dominated the 1# defense the entire 2nd half and still had a chance to win. I just hope the Raiders and Randy Moss are ready for ass whipping we are going to put on them. Sombody has got to pay.

Re: Walt Harris
 

[QUOTE=sniks]my point ts every week its a team effort win or lose you cant cut everybody who plays poorly on any given week.The defense as a whole didnt play well enough to win.no sacks no ints.made simms into a probowler today.[/QUOTE]

Remember, no Sean Taylor in backfield was devastating. I knew Prioleau woudn't hold it down. Where was Matt Bowen the entire game? Prioleau should not have played in front of him.

Re: Walt Harris
 

Walt Harris is playing awful hurt or not. Rogers should be starting, at least it will get him ready for the future. I don't think Smoot leaving is hurting us that much. It hurts the depth, but he is getting rocked in Minnesota and he is only playing number 2 like he would be here. This season is in the shitter....we can't cover Tampa's 1,3 and 4 WR's and had a hard time against Philly's 2,3,4's what the hell are they going to do against Moss and Porter or even Bruce and Holt. Taylor coming back will help at least.

Re: Walt Harris
 

cooley and sellers are not deep threats. moss is the only one.

Re: Walt Harris
 

Our biggest problem on D is the lack of a pass rush. While Walt Harris did a poor job covering today, when you don't get pressure (without blitzing) it's just too much time in the pocket to get the job done. There's no way a rookie QB should have picked our D the way Simms did today.

Re: Walt Harris
 

[QUOTE=PSUskinsfan11]....we can't cover Tampa's 1,3 and 4 WR's and had a hard time against Philly's 2,3,4's what the hell are they going to do against Moss and Porter or even Bruce and Holt. Taylor coming back will help at least.[/QUOTE]

That's a brilliant point. Those games, against those receivers could decide the fate of this season.

Judging from what we've seen, Moss, Porter, Bruce and Holt will eat this team alive.

Re: Walt Harris
 

finally some of you guys are starting to face reality.

Re: Walt Harris
 

[QUOTE=sniks]finally some of you guys are starting to face reality.[/QUOTE]

First of all, I've always been a realist -- almost to the point of pessimism. I've seen the flaws of this team since week one, and I don't hesitate to point them out, even when they win.

While the Skins are worlds apart from where they were a year ago, one area steps up and improves one week, while another segment takes a step back. Pass rush and turnovers continue to be a problem with no solution in sight, even with the wizard Joe Gibbs involved.

I believe the history books will eventually tell the story of the 2005 Redskins as a "middle of the pack" team -- with a 'one and done' playoff appearance.

As always though, I hope I'm wrong.

Re: Walt Harris
 

Roger stunk too. I think we really missed Sean Taylor today.

Re: Walt Harris
 

[QUOTE=sniks]cooley and sellers are not deep threats. moss is the only one.[/QUOTE]

What difference does it make what kind of WR Moss is. Cooley and Sellers are still decent WR's moreso than any other TE and FB combination in the league. Remember Sellers has more TDs (6) than Moss (5) So please save the rhetoric about the Redskins just having one decent WR.

Re: Walt Harris
 

I agree BEEMNSEVEN.I didnt make that statement in a negative way its just some people on this board want to make excuses every week.Just face it we still have along way to go.

Re: Walt Harris
 

My point is Moss would be that much better with another TRUE reciever on the other side of him.Nothing against cooley or sellars they are invaluable to this team.

Re: Walt Harris
 

[QUOTE=sniks]My point is Moss would be that much better with another TRUE reciever on the other side of him.Nothing against cooley or sellars they are invaluable to this team.[/QUOTE]

Every winning team in the league is one player away from having a losing record.

I don't here any of the NFL experts criticizing Delhomme and Steve Smith, McNabb and T.O. or Manning and Plaxico Burress for having only one WR as a weapon. Every team has one outstanding WR and RB. That's it. Anything else is on the defensive side of the ball. That's the point I was trying to make.

I bet most people can't even name the the 2# receivers for most of the teams in the league with winning records.

Re: Walt Harris
 

At this point, I really have no complaints about our passing game overall. Sooner or later though, if Moss has a bad game, and some team is able to shut him down, you would hope that David Patten is capable of picking up the slack.

I just think that Brunell is really in sync with Moss and Cooley. They are his favorite targets, they find ways to get open, and they make the catch.

Would I like another Monk and Clark tandem? Sure. But as long as we can keep a winning record, I really don't care where the passes are distributed.

The main concern now has to be the defense, with their non-existent pass rush, and big play weaknesses.