![]() |
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
just a thought, Joe (T.) made that predicton before all the recent turmoil. maybe he doesn't like Brunell, or just the effect of a sudden switch will have during the week.
|
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
Good point SUNRA about Williams knowing Bledsoe, I didn't even think of that.
|
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
Dude i'd pick the cowboys too. Do you realize that Mark Brunnel is our qb. Our only hope is that Demarcus Ware comes around the outside on the first play of the game and breaks brunnels leg and Ramsey comes back in.
|
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
based on what Chicago's offense is doing today (31 at half) we can accurately calculate that Dallas will score -12 points against us Monday.
|
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
If people are going to judge tomorrow night's game by what happened last week, then you also have to consider what's happening today...at least with the Bears.
The Bears only had one score against us....by us giving them the ball deep in our own territory. Today, the Bears score over 30 points in one half. So, the excuse that the Bears' had a rookie QB, and their offense isn't capable of scoring doesn't fly with me. The Redskins are alot better than what some of you people are giving them credit for. Sure, I know, they'll have to prove it. |
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
skinsguy - It certainly makes our defense look better, but has that ever really been the question with the Washington Redskins last and this year?
|
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
[QUOTE=Daseal]skinsguy - It certainly makes our defense look better, but has that ever really been the question with the Washington Redskins last and this year?[/QUOTE]
I dunno...with some of the 27-6 predictions that people are giving tomorrow night's game against Dallas, I could see how that might be considered questioning our defense. Maybe they're thinking in terms of our offense not holding onto the ball long enough to give the D a rest. However, again, our offense held the ball quite a long time against the tough Bears defense. |
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
sigh. nobody discuss. what do we know? just cheer.
|
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
[QUOTE=illdefined]sigh. nobody discuss. what do we know? just cheer.[/QUOTE]
What's that supposed to mean? :confused- |
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
[QUOTE=skinsguy]
Maybe they're thinking in terms of our offense not holding onto the ball long enough to give the D a rest. However, again, our offense held the ball quite a long time against the tough Bears defense.[/QUOTE] I think that's the question... But if Gibbs is preaching turnover free ball all week, maybe we'll slug out a win... |
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
[QUOTE=BleedBurgundy]I think that's the question... But if Gibbs is preaching turnover free ball all week, maybe we'll slug out a win...[/QUOTE]
I think that's exactly what we need to be concerned about. Turnovers often lead to losses. Even if our offense isn't lighting it up, as long as we don't turn the ball over and play smart football, I see no reason why we wouldn't have a chance. I think Dallas is a good team, but they're not the freakin' world champs! |
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
just the dueling sigs, all the animosity, and that the only welcome discussions are the ones dissing journalists who diss us.
|
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
[QUOTE=skinsguy]I think that's exactly what we need to be concerned about. Turnovers often lead to losses. Even if our offense isn't lighting it up, as long as we don't turn the ball over and play smart football, I see no reason why we wouldn't have a chance. I think Dallas is a good team, but they're not the freakin' world champs![/QUOTE]
Hence Brunell starting. We would have lost against the bears with Ramsey in there the whole game. I am starting to understand brunell in there, I give him one game before i go against this decision. tommorrow is a big night for us |
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
[QUOTE=illdefined]just the dueling sigs, all the animosity, and that the only welcome discussions are the ones dissing journalists who diss us.[/QUOTE]
Not sure why you say that? All of us have taken part in the dead horse of a thread discussing Ramsey and Brunell. And we all have discussed our confidence, or lack of, in Joe Gibbs. Maybe the journalists threads seem more welcome because we all mostly agree to disagree with the journalist; if that's that case, you can't expect everybody to agree with QB or coach issues. As far as the animosity, there's none on my end. I'm proud to be a Redskins fan! I enjoy it. I can't help if others aren't enjoying being fans. Finally, the dueling sigs...well, I'm not dueling with anybody, if someone feels I am, that's their problem not mine. |
Re: Even Theisman going against us.
[QUOTE=BigSKINBauer]Hence Brunell starting. We would have lost against the bears with Ramsey in there the whole game.
I am starting to understand brunell in there, I give him one game before i go against this decision. tommorrow is a big night for us[/QUOTE] Tomorrow night is a huge night for us! I still say, tomorrow MIGHT dictate how the next few games will go for us. Beating the Cowboys could certainly boost this team! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.