![]() |
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself?
|
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
[QUOTE=DGreene28;284706]We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself?[/QUOTE]
I figured as much. I'm in Meriden, just off 691 I just sent you a PM |
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
[QUOTE=SmootSmack;284709]I figured as much. I'm in Meriden, just off 691
I just sent you a PM[/QUOTE] Looks like that Love Boat avatar is already starting to pay off ;) (that's right, I have the sense of humor of a middle schooler, you wanna fight about it?) |
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
mcmichael would be a good back up to cooley if anything ever happen to him. but it would have to be a bargain contract or hardly any signing bonus. Need to find a guard or dlineman.
|
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
McMichael is one of the better receiving TEs in the league, no way he's even on our radar.
|
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
I always like TE depth. I feel like you can never have enough good TEs. I've just never liked McMichael. He's a subpar blocker, has character issues, and is even overrated at what he does well--catching the football.
Graham would be so much more enticing its not even funny. |
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
[quote=dall-assblows;284651]1 question: what kind of fish will be be frying?[/quote]
i always liked salmon |
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
[quote=SmootSmack;284637]For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together
But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority[/quote] add me to the like him but dont go after him club way more needs than him and he is looking to make big money i say before we sign a new tight end we should extend colley's contract |
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
he'd immediately be the #2 here. I think he's good, but if its over 1mill per, we've got other needs to save for.
|
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
I doubt he would even want to be here. If he came here, he shouldn't get great money and wouldn't get a start ahead of Cooley (Who will make the Pro Bowl this year, thats my 'lead pipe lock'). So i don't think that makes a very attractive option for him, or us.
|
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
McMichael is more of a razzle dazzle kind of player, whereas we need a garbage man. The one thing that he could provide for this team is that he would give JC a big target in the end zone on goal line sets. We currently don't have a tall receiver and McMichael was always great in the red zone at Miami. Still i agree that we shouldn't go after him unless its a real bargain. We need a blocker to seal the ends on those counter plays and such.
|
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
He has killed at least 3 of my fantasy teams with his late season disappearing acts.
Let someone throw 30 million at him (hopefully the Cowboys or Niners) so we can laugh. |
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
Don't think he's worth our time. He's not needed, and he's not gonna get paid to block. I think the FO is making smart moves this offseason, and this will be one they shy away from
|
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
would be nice, but not for the likely price
Sign Yoder & draft a TE in rnd. 6 or 7. |
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
Nope, Cooley's our man for TE pass-catching.
We need a blocking-monster for our other TE. How will Yoder do this year in that role? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.