![]() |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
I'm feeling pretty good that a deal gets done by the end of next week. Just a hunch, is all
|
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
[quote=SmootSmack;787544]I'm feeling pretty good that a deal gets done by the end of next week. Just a hunch, is all[/quote]
Yeah. I feel alot better today than i did yesterday when i woke up but there is still alot of money on the table. I just want football! |
I think they stop with the formalities and take this bad boy to court. Big brother has to step in for any real change to occur.
Sent from my Droid |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/04/second-extension-moves-closer-to-reality/]Second extension moves closer to reality | ProFootballTalk[/url]
sounds good |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
How many extensions will it take? Obviously, they're good signs.
|
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
Once the 2nd extension is up, I think there's a deal or there's a lockout. I'm betting on deal.
|
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
[quote=Mattyk;787581]Once the 2nd extension is up, I think there's a deal or there's a lockout. I'm betting on deal.[/quote]
Yea, no need for extension if they are not close. |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
Definitely leaning towards a deal. If they were too far apart, the union would have de-certified and taken it to court and we'd already be in the lockout.
|
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
[quote=Monkeydad;787589]Definitely leaning towards a deal. If they were too far apart, the union would have de-certified and taken it to court and we'd already be in the lockout.[/quote]
Agreed. Just the fact that they've agreed to continue talking indicates progress. I think both sides realize that a lockout would be a huge mess. |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
From what I heard and understand, the extension allows both parties more time to come to an agreement, once the CBA is expired the players can decertify and take it to fed. court in Minn where a judge whom has ruled in the players favor the last 15 years or so will again get to be the judge. Once in the courts, an expert figured it would take approx 6 months for a ruling. So the players time to decertify and file in court without it resulting in those 6 mos cutting into the reg season is rapidly approaching.
I dont undertand how a judge can be specially set to a matter for over 15 years thoo. I know in Mont Co Cir Co there is one judge who handles the complex contract/business matters b/c those types of cases req a greater understanding of the principles, law in that particular specialized area vs your avg bench judge. |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
I think the big blow was the order that the owners CAN'T use TV money for 2 years even without games. That was their silver bullet, telling the NFLPA..."it doesn't matter to us, we're set for 2 years even without games". Their claim of a 2 year "war chest" was shot down.
[url=http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6172379]Federal judge backs NFLPA in dispute over TV money - ESPN[/url] |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
About the tv contracts, I found it alil misleading for the owners to say they would have to pay back the 4 bil but left out that they would get to keep 420 mil.
Also, odd was that directv would have to pay 9% more than usual to the nfl if there was a strike and no football. |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
[quote=over the mountain;787593]From what I heard and understand, the extension allows both parties more time to come to an agreement, once the CBA is expired the players can decertify and take it to fed. court in Minn where a judge whom has ruled in the players favor the last 15 years or so will again get to be the judge. Once in the courts, an expert figured it would take approx 6 months for a ruling. So the players time to decertify and file in court without it resulting in those 6 mos cutting into the reg season is rapidly approaching.
[B]I dont undertand how a judge can be specially set to a matter for over 15 years thoo. I know in Mont Co Cir Co there is one judge who handles the complex contract/business matters b/c those types of cases req a greater understanding of the principles, law in that particular specialized area vs your avg bench judge[/B].[/quote] The way I heard it is each CBA is basically an extension of the previous ones since 1987, so Judge Doty remains on the matter. |
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
Just heard on 980AM that the CBA has been extended 7 days. That's got to be a good sign. Sorry, no link yet.
|
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
[quote=GMScud;787617]Just heard on 980AM that the CBA has been extended 7 days. That's got to be a good sign. Sorry, no link yet.[/quote]
Yes!!!!!!!! Per Adam S. as well |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.