Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=Chico23231;1192988][YT]nOe0v8Zx_2g[/YT]

What’s impressive is not just the big hits and wow plays...his dissecting the play and awareness is off the charts.[/quote]

He'd be my pick in 2 seconds. Just imagine having a LB that can actually cover TE's.

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=MTK;1192991]I like the idea of Tim Settle in the 2nd round[/quote]

I’m a va tech homer...and I’m really skeptical about Edmunds and Settle...even more with Settle. So if we don’t take a NT with Payne or Vea, then I would skip Settle and look at the NT from nc state in the 4th.

But we absolutely cannot go into the season with Phil Taylor as the NT, it’s not an option and someone should be fired if that’s the case

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=Schneed10;1192963]Co-signed. This is exactly where I am.

Ward may be somewhere between thrilled and happy for me. I'd be over the moon about the first 4, and over the moon if we trade down. Very happy with Ward, and happy with Vea or Payne.

I'll be pissed if it's Guice at 13. Really pissed.[/quote]

Pretty much agree except on Edmunds. I don't see it with him at all. And Payne. No thanks.

Trade down and Guice agree 100%.

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1192994]He'd be my pick in 2 seconds. Just imagine having a LB that can actually cover TE's.[/quote]

To me he's the 2nd best player overall in the draft behind Nelson.. Have watched tape on both and they are both Elite talent. Chubb is right behind at 3.

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1192994]He'd be my pick in 2 seconds. Just imagine having a LB that can actually cover TE's.[/quote]

And as sure a tackler as there is.

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1193000]To me he's the 2nd best player overall in the draft behind Nelson.. Have watched tape on both and they are both Elite talent. Chubb is right behind at 3.[/quote]

My thing with Smith is he has the speed, playmaking ability and can cover a TE. He just looks like a potentially great player that doesn't come off the field. Plus he is a pure tackler. We just haven't had many guys like that on our defense. I just don't think Smith will be there at 13.

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

If the safeties are gone and Rosen is there at 10, trade up with Oakland to grab him.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[QUOTE=itvnetop;1193012]If the safeties are gone and Rosen is there at 10, trade up with Oakland to grab him.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]We aren't trading up for anybody the best bet is a trade down but if we can't find a partner to trade down with then we'll make a pick at 13.

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=itvnetop;1193012]If the safeties are gone and Rosen is there at 10, trade up with Oakland to grab him.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk[/quote]

This would fall under the "nightmare scenario" for me. I'm not a big Rosen guy to begin with, and we don't need him at 13 let alone trading up.

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=itvnetop;1193012]If the safeties are gone and Rosen is there at 10, trade up with Oakland to grab him.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk[/quote]

Horrible idea award goes to itvnetop

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1192990]Scrolling across the bottom of espn screen...Redskins: only team to allow at least 4.5 yards per rush the last 3 season.



I can’t stress this enough, NT/DT is a major fucking need. It’s pathetic...[/QUOTE]



2.7 yards per rush last year when Jonathan Allen and Matt ionitas were healthy. We definitely need to upgrade at DT, but we made upgrades last year - we were just decimated by injuries so we didn’t get to see the improvement over the course of the entire year that we should have seen. This draft is also supposedly fairly deep at NT. It’s not imperative to reach for Vea or Payne when there should be a far superior player like Fitzpatrick, smith, James or Edmunds still on the board.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[QUOTE=skinsfan69;1192994]He'd be my pick in 2 seconds. Just imagine having a LB that can actually cover TE's.[/QUOTE]



Would love him or edmunds. If one of them fell to us, it would be hard to even consider offers to Trade down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1192990]Scrolling across the bottom of espn screen...Redskins: only team to allow at least 4.5 yards per rush the last 3 season.



I can’t stress this enough, NT/DT is a major fucking need. It’s pathetic...[/QUOTE]



Yet im seemingly the only one on this board who would consider Vea anything more than a consolation prize at 13. [emoji849]

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[QUOTE=MTK;1192987]He isn’t a pass rusher because he doesn’t have any moves and he needs a lot of work in that area of his game, listen to Cooley’s breakdown.

He wins with power and as strong as he is the ridiculous mismatches he has in college aren’t going to happen nearly as often in the pros.

I don’t have any problem with taking him if Fitzpatrick, James, Edmunds, and Smith are gone by then, which certainly could happen.[/QUOTE]



The same could be said for anyone of the players drafted tonight as far as the pros being a tougher ballgame. He will get even stronger and he will get better hopefully in the pass rush department. Just do not underestimate the value that a huge agile piece of meat like Vea brings to the rest of our front 7 as far as them being freed up to get to the quarterback. Also for that matter how that helps the secondary.

Re: With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;1193021]2.7 yards per rush last year when Jonathan Allen and Matt ionitas were healthy. We definitely need to upgrade at DT, but we made upgrades last year - we were just decimated by injuries so we didn’t get to see the improvement over the course of the entire year that we should have seen. This draft is also supposedly fairly deep at NT. It’s not imperative to reach for Vea or Payne when there should be a far superior player like Fitzpatrick, smith, James or Edmunds still on the board.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

We shouldn’t reach, but an entire offseason and NOT get NT again is completely and utterly incompetentence by the front office. It’s not a coincidence that we haven’t had a viable NT these 3 years and have averaged 4.5 ypc against, worst inthe league. I really really wished we have gotten Hankins.