Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

Is it possible for a player to "absorb" some of that cap hit himself by restructuring his contract?

If Chad was trying to get some gigantic contract with the Redskins... it may be worth it to restructure... Once again, I'm only ignorantly speculating. Where's Canuck when you need him.

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

This is the dumbest idea I've ever heard, which means that Snyder is almost certainly serious about it. Of course our reward for taking this idiot off of Mike Brown's hands is that he'll vote to opt out of the CBA and leave us in cap hell. It's all happening again God Dammit.

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[quote=sandtrapjack;421125]Lemme see if I can help....

The "Dead Money" I mentioned is the remaining portion of his pro-rated signing bonus.

If Johnson stays under contrat with the Bengals, he would get his signing bounus in (lack for better words) yearly installments. He gets a portion of that signing bonus each year.

Now if a player is traded BEFORE his contract expires, then the remaining amount of the signing bonus gets piled into one lump-sum and counts AGAINST the teams salary cap.

So if Johnson is traded, then you have FOUR YEARS of the remaining signing bonus that is (remaining signing bonus installment) X 4 yrs = 8.8 mill that instantly counts against the teams cap.

So as Bill B mentioned, by trading Johnson, the Bengals would incur and instantaneous 8.8 hit against thier cap with no player to show for it.

Hence the term "Dead Money"

Sure any team can propose a trade that would acquire Johnson, but are the Bengals going to allow it and voluntarily place themselves 8.8 million in the hole on the cap?

Now if Johnson was entering the FINAL year of his contract, that dead money hit is almost nil and a trade would be feasible for Cincy.

But with 4 years remaining on his current contract, and 8 Mill in dead money, I just do nor forsee the Bengals entertaining trade offers.[/quote]


Thanks for the clarification Sandtrap. I think that trades are a lot harder than people think and just because an agent like Drew Rosenhaus is working vigourously for his client does not mean it will happen - the salary cap has really made it difficult to trade players who still have a lot of bonus money to burn off.

I go back to the Portis for Champ Bailey trade as a reason that makes people (including writers) think you can just trade for players easily. That deal was a big headline because it was players in their prime and rarely does a team trade a player who performs well in his prime - but if you really look at that deal and the numbers you can see why it was much more doable compared to a Chad Johnson trade. Portis had a very low rookie contract that did not have a big cap implication and Champ was entering the final years of his contract and there was not as big a cap hit to occur by trading him. Portis wanted big money and the Skins were willing to give it to him. Denver wanted an elite CB and Washignton did not want to give in to Champ's massive contract demands so everything aligned and worked out.

Personally, I look at CJ's age and contract demands and I would not go in that direction. Why not let the scouting department work its magic - they seem to have done a pretty good job on picks/undrafted FA's from looking at the Redskins draft history - Cooley, Landry, Sean Taylor, Samuels, McIntosh, Heyer, Lorenzo Alexander, Anthony Montgomery.

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[QUOTE=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;415903]First round WRs are usually 50/50 gambles, but, then again, free agent wideouts aren't exactly sure-things. Brandon Lloyd anyone? Moreover, the upside and risk on lower 1st round draftees is far and away better than that of FA wideouts.[/QUOTE]

are you crazy comparing b loyd to CJ thats like comparing Tom Brady to Brad Johnson

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[quote=RobH4413;421127]Is it possible for a player to "absorb" some of that cap hit himself by restructuring his contract?

If Chad was trying to get some gigantic contract with the Redskins... it may be worth it to restructure... Once again, I'm only ignorantly speculating. Where's Canuck when you need him.[/quote]


Rob - I think it depends on the contract that was signed - with Adam Archuleta and the way his contract was made with the Skins his bonus money was staggered - he got $5 million as a signing bonus and than his next $5 million bonus was a roster bonus if he was on the Redskins the following year. I think when we traded him to Chicago the Skins were able to not absorb the 2nd roster bonus because Archuleta agreed to decline the second bonus because the Bear's were willing to give him that bonus on his new contract with their team. This was a great move by our Front office in not only were we able to pry away a 6th round pick for a player that was not going to contribute to the team anymore, but we were able to lower the cap hit in the process compared to if we just cut Adam Archuleta outright.

With Chad Johnson his massive bonus has already been paid to him so the Bengals would be stuck with the dead money no matter what the Skins agreed to.

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[quote=dan757;421141]are you crazy comparing b loyd to CJ thats like comparing Tom Brady to Brad Johnson[/quote]


welcome but no need to ask someone if they are crazy.

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[QUOTE=70Chip;421131]This is the dumbest idea I've ever heard, which means that Snyder is almost certainly serious about it. Of course our reward for taking this idiot off of Mike Brown's hands is that he'll vote to opt out of the CBA and leave us in cap hell. It's all happening again God Dammit.[/QUOTE]

I agree with ya. I've been asked multiple times over the years with snyder "how do ya think the new coach will do" ? I always said as long as Snyder owns the team the skins will go nowhere. Well, when Gibbs was hired I thought maybe I was wrong. I thought Snyder had turned a page.

This offseason has proved me wrong once again. I just can't beleive some of the stupid stuff he does. He completely screwed the family bond this years team had with the firing of GW. I really think players would have moved mountains to stay here. However, Snyder through that out the window. The players can clearly see there is no loyalty in the organization. Y would anyone want to stick around.

Why can't we go into a draft one year with all of our draft picks? :censored:
I can't see giving up a 1st and a 3rd or two 2nd round picks for CJ. To even mention giving up Moss I would consider pure stupidity. However, we are talking about Snyder here huh?

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[quote=Gtothearry;421150]I agree with ya. I've been asked multiple times over the years with snyder "how do ya think the new coach will do" ? I always said as long as Snyder owns the team the skins will go nowhere. Well, when Gibbs was hired I thought maybe I was wrong. I thought Snyder had turned a page. This offseason has proved me wrong once again. I just can't beleive some of the stupid stuff he does. He completely screwed the family bond this years team had with the firing of GW.

Why can't we go into a draft one year with all of our draft picks? :censored:[/quote]


we have all but 1 of our picks this year

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;421152]we have all but 1 of our picks this year[/QUOTE]

Yea, for now. However, if the CJ trade goes down there goes at least the 1st.

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[quote=Gtothearry;421157]Yea, for now. However, if the CJ trade goes down there goes at least the 1st.[/quote]


not necesarily why not take a wait and see approach instead of going in saying "fuck" everything

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

No to Ocho Cinco.

1) Not what a first time HC needs; a 30 yr. old, very expensive, self-serving head case in the locker room.

2) Johnson "disappears" quite a bit. His numbers are misleading, he will explode in a couple of games and then do little or nothing for 3-4 weeks at a time.

3) Not sure the Bengals are going to want to take an $ 8M + cap hit anyway

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;421158]not necesarily why not take a wait and see approach instead of going in saying "fuck" everything[/QUOTE]

Im waiting to see what happens. Just voicing my opinion on past years. Im hoping we have learned from the past.

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;421159]No to Ocho Cinco.

1) Not what a first time HC needs; a 30 yr. old, very expensive, [B][I]self-serving head case in the locker room[/I][/B].

2) Johnson "disappears" quite a bit. His numbers are misleading, he will explode in a couple of games and then do little or nothing for 3-4 weeks at a time.

3) Not sure the Bengals are going to want to take an $ 8M + cap hit anyway[/quote]


Explain that part more please.

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;421161]Explain that part more please.[/quote]
Obviously the NFL is a business and players need to look out for their best interest; but threatening to sit out 2008 to force a trade, trashing the Bengals organization in multiple interviews, trashing the Cincy media, pushing reporters, on top of the whole "look at me" celebrations is what I'm referring to.

I could get past the celebration thing if he's putting up TDs for the Skins, but the guy is in a 4-year contract and pretty well paid. Things are a little bumpy up in Cincy and he's ready to bail. What happens if JC struggles or Zorn makes a few mistakes.....not enough upside from Chad for the money and potential headaches for the Skins IMO.

[URL="http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2008/02/07/chad-johnson-shoves-member-of-the-nfl-media-relations/"]Chad Johnson Shoves Member of the NFL's Media Relations Department - FanHouse - AOL Sports Blog[/URL]

Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;421159]No to Ocho Cinco.

1) Not what a first time HC needs; a 30 yr. old, very expensive, self-serving head case in the locker room.

2) [b]Johnson "disappears" quite a bit. His numbers are misleading, he will explode in a couple of games and then do little or nothing for 3-4 weeks at a time.[/b]

3) Not sure the Bengals are going to want to take an $ 8M + cap hit anyway[/quote]

I tend to disagree with note 2)

to the contrary if you look at the production of T. J. Houshmandzadeh this past season, you will see he has more yards and TD's than CJ.

But I credit that as a direct reflection of CJ's abilities. With most teams shifting coverges to Johnsons side and doubling him, it created more opportunities for Houshmandzadeh to excel.

That is what a WR of Johnsons abilities brings to the table. He does not have to get 25 TD's and 1500 yds per year to contribute. His mere presence on the field forces defenses to account for him at all times, thereby creating opportunities for his team mates.

Just think of the possibilities of Moss and Johnson on the field. Who do you double team? Pick your poison is all I can say.

Throw ARE in the slot and you have provided Campbell with several legitimate targets. Did I mention Cooley?