![]() |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=nonniey;1315040]Bolded is completely wrong (harsher than Oklahoma? Texas, Idaho??? those states are at the extreme end at 6 weeks or less and have felony charges attached). And the underlined is wrong if you are claiming requiring abortions being performed prior to 15 weeks bans most abortions, as almost all abortions occur prior to 15 weeks. 15 weeks is eminently reasonable as that is about the norm for the rest of the civilized world. Now the other requirements you mentioned I'll have to look at to see what their actual effects are.
What are your thoughts on Maryland's new abortion law? ______ Missed some earlier replies I noticed from last month. Just want to follow up that the Republicans missed an opportunity.[/quote] Doctors also have to register with the state before administering medication abortions, which are typically performed through a combination of the FDA-approved drugs mifepristone and misoprostol. About half of all abortions in Kentucky are medication abortions. But the state hasn’t set up a system to register yet, meaning that it’s impossible for doctors to comply. The state hasn’t yet laid out its plans to do so. And physicians performing nonsurgical procedures must maintain hospital admitting privileges near where they perform those procedures. Because local hospitals may refuse abortion providers admitting privileges at their discretion, that makes it impossible for pregnant people to obtain an abortion in certain areas of the state. The Supreme Court has previously struck down laws with similar requirements in Texas and Louisiana as unconstitutional. ^^ from the article. Among other "substantial burden" restrictions placed in the new law. Conservatives, with the blessing of our new SCOTUS makeup including a woman who talks in tongues, are actively trying to over turn Roe v Wade. ^ I hope we can at least agree on that. its like a State placing all these restrictions on ammo that make it impossible to own ammo. the SCOTUS is just a political party to now give rulings based upon political ideals ... Conservatives broke the SC when they didnt issue an injunction to the Texas law. This country will be liberal as the old white evangelicals die off. Taking away the checks and balances now ... only fuck our country 40 years from now. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Chico23231;1302571]Trump broke G1. Trump should be paying rent cause he lives in G1 brain.[/quote]
How do you feel about people who worship Trump to the point they felt it [URL="https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/u59dw7/trump_rally_at_disney_world_right_now_wreaking/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3"]necessary to spend an entire day of their free time blocking Disney World[/URL] just for attention? Do they also meet the criteria? I mean literally - I hate Trump, one of the select few people I truly hate and would not have an ounce of sadness when he dies - but if you asked me to go spend some of my free time in DC chanting with my fellow Dems about how much I hate him - despite living within reasonable driving distance of DC - I would not go. Because it accomplishes nothing. There aren't many people left in the US that have no opinion of Trump whatsoever - nothing is going to change unless people in a position of power take action. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=mooby;1315076]How do you feel about people who worship Trump to the point they felt it [URL="https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/u59dw7/trump_rally_at_disney_world_right_now_wreaking/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3"]necessary to spend an entire day of their free time blocking Disney World[/URL] just for attention?
Do they also meet the criteria? I mean literally - I hate Trump, one of the select few people I truly hate and would not have an ounce of sadness when he dies - but if you asked me to go spend some of my free time in DC chanting with my fellow Dems about how much I hate him - despite living within reasonable driving distance of DC - I would not go. Because it accomplishes nothing. There aren't many people left in the US that have no opinion of Trump whatsoever - nothing is going to change unless people in a position of power take action.[/quote] I’ve been told protests like this is just a ok. But remember the standard set by Democrats in the blm/antifa riots is they can attack police, attack people, burn down buildings, loot, shoot each other, etc. Those standards you set and wouldn’t speak out against…so these folks have the right to do this. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Chico23231;1315077]I’ve been told protests like this is just a ok.
But remember the standard set by Democrats in the blm/antifa riots is they can attack police, attack people, burn down buildings, loot, shoot each other, etc. Those standards you set and wouldn’t speak out against…so these folks have the right to do this.[/quote] ..............and the trump sheep speaks! chico your blame of all democrats and trump worship is reason why you and your trump sheep brethren get no respect. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Chico23231;1315077]I’ve been told protests like this is just a ok.
But remember the standard set by Democrats in the blm/antifa riots is they can attack police, attack people, burn down buildings, loot, shoot each other, etc. Those standards you set and wouldn’t speak out against…so these folks have the right to do this.[/quote] I disagree, and have said this multiple times - I do not think the people using the riots as an excuse to burn/loot/etc. are sanctioned to do so by BLM/antifa (a separate subject entirely is that both of those groups are loose/informal groups with no clearly recognized national leader dishing "orders" ala Trump). I think opportunists recognize the opportunity of mass public chaos as cover to break the law. We do - and have spoken out clearly against those people. You choose to ignore it, and the cycle resets every few months. C'est la vie |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=mooby;1315099]I disagree, and have said this multiple times - I do not think the people using the riots as an excuse to burn/loot/etc. are sanctioned to do so by BLM/antifa (a separate subject entirely is that both of those groups are loose/informal groups with no clearly recognized national leader dishing "orders" ala Trump). I think opportunists recognize the opportunity of mass public chaos as cover to break the law. We do - and have spoken out clearly against those people. You choose to ignore it, and the cycle resets every few months. C'est la vie[/quote]
Lol…Mooby rationalize it so you can sleep at night. Ignore the blm activist saying rioting is the language of the oppressed, ignore the interviews of the protesters at the actual protest stating it was ok to commit political violence for the cause, ignore the folks handing out weapons during the protest, ignore the folks standing around a burning building yelling blm, ignore the fact no one attempted to stop the violence durning the protest, ignoring the rampant anti-semitism chants and signs, ignore articles by left wing nuts justifying looting, vandalism, rioting, etc. These were the standards set by Democrats and the left, |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
No one here is going to Antifa or Proud Boy rallies. I doubt anyone has gone to a Biden or Trump rally. Why do we spend all our time attacking, defending or comparing the two extreme political ends?
All we do as americans, sit on our phones or computers and echo far right or far left talking points that few of us actually are apart of. Give me good schools, cops that dont pull me over for going 7 of the speed limit and get out of the way. Theres no kindergarden tranny indoctrination, theres no war on christianity ... there is a kinda war with our border, energy sector, universal healthcare is looking more and more attractive Debate: - immigration and borders? how do they work, can we stop people from just walking over? - health care, why do I have an 8k deductible and still pay a ton of month? - actual constructive effective police reform (that means more money but to the right programs i.e. mental health units so cops are sent to deal w a bi polar teenager; reviewing no knock warrants) - investors buying up single family houses instead we fight over made fights like CRT or starbucks saying "happy holidays" instead of merry christmas |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, the committee’s top Republican, admonished Gensler for failing to provide “real answers” to written questions submitted to the SEC by GOP senators on how the agency developed the proposal. He also predicted that the Supreme Court would toss out the rule if it is ultimately implemented.
“The SEC may not want to answer to Congress on its climate disclosure rule,” Toomey said, “but, ultimately, the SEC will have to answer to the courts, which should make it nervous.” [url]https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sen-toomey-tells-sec-chief-to-be-on-notice-that-supreme-court-may-overrule-new-climate-rules-11663256423?siteid=yhoof2[/url] SCOTUS is now a legislative/policy sword of the Republican party. fuck the SC |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[url]https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236323/episode/part-one-the-clarence-thomas-story-99759984/[/url]
I'm not a podcasts guy but I stumbled across this podcast on Clarence Thomas and holy hell what a rough childhood. I always wondered how his ideology was shaped. You're talking about all the role models in his life beating him and working him to death as a kid - removing the heater on the truck because having heat in winter somehow makes you less tough - to being on the SCOTUS - he probably looks at that as a necessary part of his success. No wonder he's a consummate conservative, a tough, no frills childhood with strict role models results in him working his way up to SCOTUS - he's the ideal American success story in their mind. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
INSIDER
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh went to CPAC boss Matt Schlapp's holiday party, which Trump ally Stephen Miller and Rep. Matt Gaetz also attended: report [url]https://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-justice-brett-kavanaugh-150331909.html[/url] Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh went to a holiday party at the home of Matt Schlapp — the chairman of the influential right-wing group Conservative Political Action Coalition — Friday night, Politico first reported. Among other attendees at the Christmas party included Stephen Miller, a longtime ally to former President Donald Trump, Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, Trump's former White House press secretary Sean Spicer, and Rep.-elect George Santos of New York, Politico reported. The appearance has sparked questions about possible conflicts of interest with a sitting Supreme Court justice attending a private party of right-wing leaders. Miller's conservative group, America First Legal, has filed briefs on cases that are pending before the Supreme Court, according to Bloomberg. [B]Christian evangelical minister Rev. Robert Schenck told The Times and testified before the House Judiciary Committee last week that he gained advance knowledge of the decision in the high-profile Supreme Court case, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores. The 5-4 majority, in an opinion delivered by Justice Samuel Alito, ruled that paying for insurance that covered contraception violated the religious freedoms of privately held, for-profit companies. Schenck, a former anti-abortion activist, told congressional lawmakers that he had been involved in a decades-long effort to try and influence the thinking of some of the conservative Supreme Court justices.[/B] |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkMNc0IWAAEv3kE?format=jpg&name=large[/IMG]
Justice Clarence Thomas quietly lays wreaths with all the other volunteers every year at Arlington National Cemetery for #wreathsacrossamerica to honor those who have the ultimate sacrifice. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
Fuck him!
|
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Giantone;1332260]Fuck him![/quote]
That's the Christmas spirit!! |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1332262]That's the Christmas spirit!![/quote]
Amazing isn’t it? |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1332262]That's the Christmas spirit!![/quote]
Coming from you and your parrot that 's real fucking funny! [IMG]https://y.yarn.co/b289086a-dc19-4305-bc84-9ece29c63e41_text.gif[/IMG] |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Chico23231;1332263]Amazing isn’t it?[/quote]
fuck you to. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Giantone;1332284]fuck you to.[/quote]
Fuck you too.* FIFY |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Giantone;1332283]Coming from you and your parrot that 's real fucking funny!
[IMG]https://y.yarn.co/b289086a-dc19-4305-bc84-9ece29c63e41_text.gif[/IMG][/quote] My parrot? But I was actually listening to Jimmy Buffet earlier. [IMG]https://jimwarren.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/jimmybuffettparrothead.jpg[/IMG] Side note - You might actually be enjoyable to talk to if you had any sense of humor. But you don't. Just an angry dude that will argue with anyone that doesn't parrot your talking points. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Chico23231;1332263]Amazing isn’t it?[/quote]
Me and my friends and family have been doing WAA at ANC for almost 10 years now, he can lay as many wreaths as he wants and I'd still say fuck him too. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=mooby;1332287]Me and my friends and family have been doing WAA at ANC for almost 10 years now, he can lay as many wreaths as he wants and I'd still say fuck him too.[/quote]
Of course, totally normal behavior |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Giantone;1332284]fuck you to.[/quote]
This is what liberals look like. Totally normal people |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1332286]My parrot? But I was actually listening to Jimmy Buffet earlier.
Side note - You might actually be enjoyable to talk to if you had any sense of humor. But you don't. Just an angry dude that will argue with anyone that doesn't parrot your talking points.[/quote] [IMG]https://c8p9p3e5.rocketcdn.me/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/judge-kermit-meme-e1553719945900.jpg[/IMG] |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Chico23231;1332308]Of course, totally normal behavior[/quote]
What's more important, laying some wreaths once a year or dictating public policy that every American has to follow for most of their adult life? |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=mooby;1332322]What's more important, laying some wreaths once a year or dictating public policy that every American has to follow for most of their adult life?[/quote]
Or as a SCJ lying to the American public, at least have the balls to recuse yourself from the case. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=mooby;1332322]What's more important, laying some wreaths once a year or dictating public policy that every American has to follow for most of their adult life?[/quote]
Mooby does this guy really make your life so miserable? I thought was a nice picture and a good example of a public person quietly doing a nice act not for publicity which is something rare in the shithole which is Washington DC. Where everyone is constantly engaged in some fake, performative action |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Chico23231;1332333]Mooby does this guy really make your life so miserable?
I thought was a nice picture and a good example of a public person quietly doing a nice act not for publicity which is something rare in the shithole which is Washington DC. Where everyone is constantly engaged in some fake, performative action[/quote] Kudos to him for doing a public service without asking for attention. I still think his wackjob wife has corrupted his mind and poisoned the SCOTUS. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=mooby;1332341]Kudos to him for doing a public service without asking for attention.
I still think his wackjob wife has corrupted his mind and poisoned the SCOTUS.[/quote] He's an asshole, all it took was a small back hand comment he didn't think would carry about "same sex marriage and we had to rush a law through so he and his political hit croup of SCJ wouldn't screw that up like they di with Roe V Wade. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
"The only means left to mitigate the crisis, the States suggest, is an order from this Court directing the federal government to continue its COVID-era Title 42 policies as long as possible—at the very least during the pendency of our review," Gorsuch wrote.*
"For my part, I do not discount the States’ concerns. Even the federal government acknowledges ‘that the end of the Title 42 orders will likely have disruptive consequences,'" he continued in the dissent. "But the current border crisis is not a COVID crisis. And courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency. We are a court of law, not policymakers of last resort." [url]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-justices-issue-scathing-title-42-dissent-we-are-court-law[/url] So bye bye miss american pie drove the chevy to the levy but the levy was dry and the good ole boys drinkin whiskey and rye singin this will be the day that I die this will be the day that I die Rest In Pieces SCOTUS Killed by Christian Nationalists .... |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
Trump appointed federal judge in texas, who worked for a christain law firm fighting gay rights, is to decide whether abortion pills should be banned for medication side effects.
If he rules for the christian group bringing the suit .. abortion pills will be banned in all 50 states, appeals yada yada yada [url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/rogue-trump-appointed-judge-abortion-070025964.html[/url] The pill has been used by millions and approved 22 years ago ... but yeah, side effects are what this christian group is concerned about When religious people wonder why others hate them .. this. This is why. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=SunnySide;1337768]Trump appointed federal judge in texas, who worked for a christain law firm fighting gay rights, is to decide whether abortion pills should be banned for medication side effects.
If he rules for the christian group bringing the suit .. abortion pills will be banned in all 50 states, appeals yada yada yada [url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/rogue-trump-appointed-judge-abortion-070025964.html[/url] The pill has been used by millions and approved 22 years ago ... but yeah, side effects are what this christian group is concerned about When religious people wonder why others hate them .. this. This is why.[/quote] Next they will try to ban condoms' for the good of all the Christian lives it will save! |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[IMG]https://media.tenor.com/FfHozmky4I0AAAAd/simpsons-leaving.gif[/IMG]
|
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1337777][IMG]https://media.tenor.com/FfHozmky4I0AAAAd/simpsons-leaving.gif[/IMG][/quote]
Exactly. There is no defense or spin. ill wait to see what this 40 something religious judge rules. I have zero hope you and your side will appreciate the damage that it is doing to our government and democracy. Like Lenny, just squeezing that idea of 1050s America as hard as you can until you kill it. Religion has no place in government .. shouldnt even be up for debate. |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
Justice Clarence Thomas, aka the Great One, layeth the smacketh down:
He went on, warning of the dangers of relying on so-called experts to divvy up racial justice. “Jackson then builds from her faulty premise to call for action, arguing that courts should defer to ‘experts’ and allow institutions to discriminate on the basis of race. Make no mistake: Her dissent is not a vanguard of the innocent and helpless. It is instead a call to empower privileged elites, who will ‘tell us [what] is required to level the playing field’ among castes and classifications that they alone can divine…Then, after siloing us all into racial castes and pitting those castes against each other, the dis-sent somehow believes that we will be able—at some undefined point—to ‘march forward together’ into some utopian vision…Social movements that invoke these sorts of rallying cries, historically, have ended disastrously.” Wow! Sit down Judge Brown |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
[quote=Chico23231;1342932]Justice Clarence Thomas, aka the Great One, layeth the smacketh down:
He went on, warning of the dangers of relying on so-called experts to divvy up racial justice. “Jackson then builds from her faulty premise to call for action, arguing that courts should defer to ‘experts’ and allow institutions to discriminate on the basis of race. [B]Make no mistake: Her dissent is not a vanguard of the innocent and helpless. It is instead a call to empower privileged elites, who will ‘tell us [what] is required to level the playing field’ among castes and classifications that they alone can divine…Then, after siloing us all into racial castes and pitting those castes against each other, the dis-sent somehow believes that we will be able—at some undefined point—to ‘march forward together’ into some utopian vision…Social movements that invoke these sorts of rallying cries, historically, have ended disastrously.”[/B] Wow! Sit down Judge Brown[/quote] Lolololol |
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
This decision should have happened 20 years ago when O'Conner stated (paraphrasing) we were almost there and just another 10-15 years affirmative action could be overturned. At that time it would have generated a small to moderate blip from the left. Now?? it is a disaster of epic proportions that essentially is instantly returning the country to Jim Crow or even slavery - according to the left. Just another example of the zero sum game politics in this country has become - from each side, every political issue must be approached as if the very existence of the country depends on it. Damn shame - nothing is really wrong with this verdict, in contrast it is totally right.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.