|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-03-2005, 10:12 AM
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Too WR or Not
Ok, I'm still confused, almost all the big name WR are gone in FA, and the only big name left is P. Burress, I remember Gibbs, saying he wanted to take care all things in FA, and let the Draft be some place where they can rome Free....I thinking what are doing.....
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
03-03-2005, 10:28 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 665
|
Re: Too WR or Not
Yeah. It looks like we'll have to hold on to Coles afterall. Which isn't bad for the roster, but it's potentially bad for the 'locker room' though. :onk:
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 11:06 AM
|
#3 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
|
Re: Too WR or Not
As Gibbs pointed out, Burress and Muhammad were too expensive, and Derrick Mason apparently has interest in signing with other teams. But the news makes it optimistic that we could finally trade for Santana Moss.
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 11:32 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 665
|
Re: Too WR or Not
Newsflash. Mason has agreed to sign with BAL. We got to move fast with trading Gardner. BAL was one of the teams in need of WRs.
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 11:35 AM
|
#5 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Too WR or Not
Coles will stay and he will play hard. If not he won't dress out. I honestly can't see Coles saying a bunch of things in the locker room to bring the team down!
We'll go a big name receiver in the draft I bet. |
|
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 11:38 AM
|
#6 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 19,218
|
Re: Too WR or Not
Most definitely. I mean as bitchy as Coles has been, I can't see him not playing his best.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
