![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,449
|
Rinehart back in
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#2 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,014
|
Re: Rinehart back in
Why not at this point....Montgomery seemed to struggle recently
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Rinehart back in
Alright. So, four weeks after signing Levi Jones, we decide to give the best five guys we have a try.
Nothing like being forced into doing the right thing.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Rinehart back in
This is good. they should be playing all the young players so that the new front office has some tape to look at when decide which of these guys to bring back next year.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 46
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Rinehart back in
Smart move!
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,238
|
Re: Rinehart back in
i'm gonna go out on a limb and say rinehart won't be one of them, but maybe he can show something he didn't the first time he got a chance
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason." ST21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Rinehart back in
I heard Jim say this on Redskins nation, but did not comment on it. Because sometimes Jimjust says stuff that is totally taken wrong. But, I am glad, I said many times I thought Rhinehart did well. I just figured I did'nt know what the hell I was looking at, because they seemed to yank him for good. I also thought that Montgomery was terrible, very confusing to me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Rinehart back in
I have gone so far as to wonder if Buges has some kind of dislike for the kid.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
|
Re: Rinehart back in
I like the move, but we need to pick a line up. It takes atleast 3 to 4 weeks before an o-line can get used to working together. You keep changing they keep looking like they are not talented. Keep one lineup together a few weeks, atleast, before saying someone can't play. Mistakes will be made until they get used to communicating with each other. (non verbal communication aka chemistry)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Rinehart back in
What exactly has ailed Rinehart? He's out, he's in. We hear it's because of injury. What's the deal?
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Rinehart back in
It looks like it is confirmed. Good for Rhinehart.Rinehart back at RG for Redskins - Redskins 360 - Washington Times
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 53
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Rinehart back in
Completely agree. Leave him in the entire season and see what he has. Nothing more to lose at this point, other than jobs!
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
|
Re: Rinehart back in
Rinehart or Montgomery, didn't seem to be any difference to me. I really want to see if Levi Jones has anything left. It would be nice if he came in and held his own. This offensive line combination might be the best the Skins have right now. I'm still concerned Campbell and Collins will be knocked out of a game at the same time. Having no third string quarterback with this offensive line is a big gamble.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
|
Re: Rinehart back in
Quote:
Cleveland Browns 1-7 Tennessee Titians 2-6 Oakland Raiders 2-6 Kansas City Chiefs 1-7 Washington Redskins 2-6 Detroit Lions 1-7 Tampa Bay Bucs 1-7 St. Louis Rams 1-7
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Rinehart back in
Quote:
This staff puts out so much BS. I thought Rhinehart was hurt? Now it seems the reason he wasn't playing was because of performance? But, from what i saw i thought that Rhinehart did a good job. And it seemed to me that Monty couldn't anchor or hold his ground. Why did it take this long to make the change? Why was the change made to go with Monty in the 1st place? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|