What is Andrew Luck Worth?

[celts32]

Originally Posted by NM Redskin

I would tend to think that the Rams would like the 7th pick over TW and select a LT. Sure TW is probably more talented then who ever would be selected at 7, but since he's one toke away, that has to greatly diminish his value I would think.

That's exactly right...the Rams would never give us their pick without getting our pick in return. And TW value is as low as it could be after his suspension. Either way i would give them #7 also and keep TW.

It's so obvious looking at this league that the teams that win consistently are the ones with franchise QB's. And as I have said over and over on here there is pretty much no price I wouldn't pay to get one. A few 1st round picks are not that significant when compared to 15 years of a franchise QB...

[skinsfaninok]

Bottom line is Andrew luck is considered as a can't miss qb even more than Sam was so I wouldnt be shocked to see stl take him and trade Bradford

[celts32]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Bottom line is Andrew luck is considered as a can't miss qb even more than Sam was so I wouldnt be shocked to see stl take him and trade Bradford

Fine...I will take him to. On April 26th i want to have one of Luck, RG3 or Bradford on the roster. Not sure I will be happy with anything else...

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by celts32

Fine...I will take him to. On April 26th i want to have one of Luck, RG3 or Bradford on the roster. Not sure I will be happy with anything else...

Luck and Bradford I'd love to have. Still have some doubts about RG3 though. I think Blackmon and Tannehill can be as effective as just RG3

[redsk1]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Luck and Bradford I'd love to have. Still have some doubts about RG3 though. I think Blackmon and Tannehill can be as effective as just RG3

I don't know alot about Tannehill besides some scouting reports, but I think I could live w/ those two drafted in 2012.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

We have no idea how many games the Colts would have won this year with Peyton Manning. If it was five or six, does that diminish his greatness any?

To me, it does not. It just makes the Colts a bad team.

I think the Colts would have won more games than six with Manning this year....at the least, eight games. This is assuming Manning was in good physical health.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Luck and Bradford I'd love to have. Still have some doubts about RG3 though. I think Blackmon and Tannehill can be as effective as just RG3

After the initial dissapointment I would probably come around on Tannehill if we ended up with him but I have the concerns about him that you have about RG3...that I don't see him being ready in 2012.

[skinsguy]

Just FYI, RG III is playing tonight at 9pm, so we all can get a good look at him and see for ourselves. I know I'll be watching.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by celts32

After the initial dissapointment I would probably come around on Tannehill if we ended up with him but I have the concerns about him that you have about RG3...that I don't see him being ready in 2012.

Well yeah but I see Blackmon being ready (or even Claiborne, Reiff)

So I'll take Tannehill (even if he's not fully ready in 2012) and a guy who I think is ready vs. only RG3

[mredskins]

When is RG3 going to announce his decision?

[diehard]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Just FYI, RG III is playing tonight at 9pm, so we all can get a good look at him and see for ourselves. I know I'll be watching.

Thanks for the reminder.

[diehard]

Originally Posted by celts32

After the initial dissapointment I would probably come around on Tannehill if we ended up with him but I have the concerns about him that you have about RG3...that I don't see him being ready in 2012.

Thank you.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Well yeah but I see Blackmon being ready (or even Claiborne, Reiff)

So I'll take Tannehill (even if he's not fully ready in 2012) and a guy who I think is ready vs. only RG3

I think we discussed this before and i don't agree. I just can't get my head around not making the play for the QB this year early in the draft. In my mind it's time to stop dking around with the most important position in the sport and do whatever it takes to get one of the QB's I mentioned. Short of Shanny sitting me down and telling me face to face that Tannehill is his #1 guy...I want them to trade up.

They could end up with Tannehill only becasue they settled for him becasue the price was to high to get the others...that's what i don't want.

[diehard]

I'll post it here too. Give me the guy who's gonna be forced to sit in the green room longer than anticipated because the fans and so-called experts underestimate him. That's who I want!

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by mredskins

When is RG3 going to announce his decision?

Word around baylor is that RG3 is going.

Then again the word around USC was that Barkley was going too, so we'll see...