Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Receivers Rotation

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-2011, 01:50 PM   #121
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,340
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Yes it would, although I would hope that in the land where everything goes right for us, Armstrong would get the first shot at the third receiver over Moss. It might even make sense then to do some 4 WR stuff with a tight end in the backfield instead of a RB.
I think it would make sense. Lots of receiving options with some protection.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-08-2011, 06:23 PM   #122
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Watch out for Aldrick Robinson - Rich Tandler's Real Redskins


Thought this was a good read & something to keep an eye on.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 11:19 AM   #123
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,280
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

A little disappointing that Gafney is #2. That to me is just awful.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 11:25 AM   #124
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

1. It's a preseason depth chart
2. What's the big scare about Gaffney being #2?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 11:31 AM   #125
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,500
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
1. It's a preseason depth chart
2. What's the big scare about Gaffney being #2?
Not that there's a scare, but would be nice to see one of the young guys stepping up big time and grabbing some playing time. Gaffney's not bad, hey much much better than seeing Galloway.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 11:32 AM   #126
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,280
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
1. It's a preseason depth chart
2. What's the big scare about Gaffney being #2?
Well they draft 50 wr's then play them with the first team and see what they can do. Why draft all these guys and hand a journeymen the #2 spot? Just makes me shake my head.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 11:37 AM   #127
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
A little disappointing that Gafney is #2. That to me is just awful.
I would fully expect Gafney to be #2 when the season starts. He's a solid vet, nothing spectacular but can make the catches to move the chains. After he & Moss, Stallworth & Armstrong are the two guys that I think will push for the starting spot. REally don't know what kind of wr Stallworth is at this point. Used to be a burner, but he's older & w/a long history of injuries.

Would love to see Hankerson grab it right off but it sounds like his dropping habit will keep him back.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 11:40 AM   #128
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Well Kelly is hurt and unfortunately probably done. Hankerson is playing his very first NFL game on Friday and should get considerable playing time this year, yet it's too early to start him.

The rest of the young guys (Austin, Paul, Robinson) were late round picks who at this stage in their career are probably more likely to find their niche on teams and for depth. As much I'd love to see a guy like Austin be our #2 or #3, that's probably not too realistic right now.

Further, I'm not sure what defines Gaffney as a journeyman
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 11:40 AM   #129
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,513
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Gaffney had 65 catches as the Broncos #2 last year. I don't think it's a bad thing that he's the early favorite to be the #2, at least to start the season. The rooks have a lot to learn in a very condensed time period. Not sure it's reasonable to expect any of them to contribute a whole lot early on.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 11:49 AM   #130
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
A little disappointing that Gafney is #2. That to me is just awful.
Disappointing? So you'd rather trade for a guy who can't contribute? Look at Gaffney's stats for the past 3 years, he's a solid contributor and has been the #2 for Denver with Royal and Marshall's regular absences from the field.

Moss, Gaffney, Armstrong, Hankerson

much better than

Moss, Armstrong, Galloway, Roydell Williams (2010)

and also better than

Moss, Randel El, Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly (2009)


Heck, I'd take it over Coles, Gardner, Thrash and Taylor Jacobs too.



This is the best WR group we've had since the Posse. Beyond those first four are solid depth possibilities with Austin, Banks, Paul, Robinson, Stallworth, Kelly...
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 12:10 PM   #131
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,280
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeydad View Post
Disappointing? So you'd rather trade for a guy who can't contribute? Look at Gaffney's stats for the past 3 years, he's a solid contributor and has been the #2 for Denver with Royal and Marshall's regular absences from the field.

Moss, Gaffney, Armstrong, Hankerson

much better than

Moss, Armstrong, Galloway, Roydell Williams (2010)

and also better than

Moss, Randel El, Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly (2009)


Heck, I'd take it over Coles, Gardner, Thrash and Taylor Jacobs too.



This is the best WR group we've had since the Posse. Beyond those first four are solid depth possibilities with Austin, Banks, Paul, Robinson, Stallworth, Kelly...
I'd rather the young guys play, get experience and let them grow. We're not going anywhere this year so why slow the development of young players? Why draft Austin if you're not going to give the guy a chance? And this is not the best wr's since the Posse. No way.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 12:19 PM   #132
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,280
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Gaffney had 65 catches as the Broncos #2 last year. I don't think it's a bad thing that he's the early favorite to be the #2, at least to start the season. The rooks have a lot to learn in a very condensed time period. Not sure it's reasonable to expect any of them to contribute a whole lot early on.
But this is not a playoff team. Right? So let em learn and get experience. Let's see how it plays out Fri. Really looking forward to some of the young guys getting some game time to show what they can do.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 12:23 PM   #133
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,420
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Malcolm Kelly gives the saddest interview of training camp - DC Sports Bog - The Washington Post

Time's up for Kelly. Even he knows he's about to get axed. Sad sad tale.
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 12:26 PM   #134
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Gaffney had 65 catches as the Broncos #2 last year. I don't think it's a bad thing that he's the early favorite to be the #2, at least to start the season. The rooks have a lot to learn in a very condensed time period. Not sure it's reasonable to expect any of them to contribute a whole lot early on.
I liked Jarmon but he wasn't going to contribute. I think Gaffney was one of our better offseason pickups.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 12:32 PM   #135
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,513
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
But this is not a playoff team. Right? So let em learn and get experience. Let's see how it plays out Fri. Really looking forward to some of the young guys getting some game time to show what they can do.
As the season goes on sure, ease them in. But to toss them out there with limited knowledge & experience with the playbook and route running at this level doesn't help anyone.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.40874 seconds with 10 queries