Will the Redskins ever get new uniforms?

[skinsfan69]

I would like them to go back to the older uniforms. Mustard pants with burgundy top for home, and away with the white top. Leave the helmets the same. This was the uniform in the early and mid 70's.

[SkinsFanSince91]

I think the "tribesman" head is a little offensive. Objectively, it is overly offensive whenthe term "redskin" is used after that. If you interchaged the concepts with most other races or ethnic groups most, if not all, of us would be crying out for action

I think we should go with the spear that was on the anniversary helmets, keep the name, and invest into projects and program for native american and the needs relevan to their community.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by SkinsFanSince91

I think the "tribesman" head is a little offensive. Objectively, it is overly offensive whenthe term "redskin" is used after that. If you interchaged the concepts with most other races or ethnic groups most, if not all, of us would be crying out for action

I think we should go with the spear that was on the anniversary helmets, keep the name, and invest into projects and program for native american and the needs relevan to their community.

IF we were actually offending Native Americans, I'd be with you. The only people really "offended" are white guys sitting in taxpayer-provided offices in D.C.

Another argument that needs to DIE. I wrote a research paper about this way back in about '91 in Junior High School and how actual Indians either don't care or are honored by the Redskins and sports team names.

It's popular to be "offended" though.

[Campbell17]

How about a dark, almost burnt yellow gold jersey, burgundy pants, and white socks?

[pbar67]

IN 1982 The uniform looked great n it still does,,its classic. Why change,,,,

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by pbar67

IN 1982 The uniform looked great n it still does,,its classic. Why change,,,,

In 1982, they were different than 1983-present.

[BAFGA]

Originally Posted by Buster

In 1982, they were different than 1983-present.

Barely....the feather was tucked in, that's about it. I don't care if it's tucked in or not, to be honest.

[Stuck in TX]

Originally Posted by BAFGA

I don't care if it's tucked in or not, to be honest.

Thats what she said

[KLHJ2]

I do not want them to change the colors or the logo, but the pattern on the jersey and pants could use an overhaul. Something like the Broncos or Titans

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by angryssg

I do not want them to change the colors or the logo, but the pattern on the jersey and pants could use an overhaul. Something like the Broncos or Titans

:vomit::vomit:

[KLHJ2]

Originally Posted by Buster

:vomit::vomit:

The patterns, not the colors.

[lwiedy]

Originally Posted by angryssg

The patterns, not the colors.

The patterns are what sucks. People tolerate Denver now, partly because thier fans love them even in burlap. But they are (along with Min., Buf (Away), Arizona, Atl., Sea.) are a joke.

[KLHJ2]

Originally Posted by lwiedy

The patterns are what sucks. People tolerate Denver now, partly because thier fans love them even in burlap. But they are (along with Min., Buf (Away), Arizona, Atl., Sea.) are a joke.

We shall agree to disagree.

[SeanTaylor21]

Originally Posted by lwiedy

The patterns are what sucks. People tolerate Denver now, partly because thier fans love them even in burlap. But they are (along with Min., Buf (Away), Arizona, Atl., Sea.) are a joke.

Personally I like the Arizona, Atlanta jerseys but not the others.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by lwiedy

The patterns are what sucks. People tolerate Denver now, partly because thier fans love them even in burlap. But they are (along with Min., Buf (Away), Arizona, Atl., Sea.) are a joke.

Thank you. Although, the colors aren't that great either. Denver was better in orange.