Is Lavar's Career over?

monk81 · 05-13-2006, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

I know it's new york, but it's also Lavar wanting the attention, which at this point is undeserving. To me, when you start off somewhere you start off humble and then prove yourself - and THEN you can talk - but until then just work your butt off.

As a comparison, look at Ramsey handling himself so far in New York. I can always respect someone that HAS respect for others.

Ditto I have a great deal of respect for Ramsey.....and I wish him the best with the Jets.......I was glad the Jets didnt draft Matt, giving Ramsey a shot at the starting job, since he's behind the oft injured Pennington...........

monk81 · 05-13-2006, 01:43 PM

As for the Boyz.........Parcells is already tired of the media asking about T.O. said he won't answer anymore questions about him until July.........
I think that T.O. won't cross Parcells path.....but he will get on Bledsoe's case when he doesn't get the ball enough...........

Giantone · 05-15-2006, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Right. Giantone, I welcome any fan who wants to come here and have an informative discussion, but before you go spouting off at the mouth, put some facts behind it.

Just like anyone, I'll give credit where it's due and I'll readily admit the division is the Skins or Giants to lose. The Giants need more of a receiving threat and I think it'll take a season or two before Sinorice gets up to speed. Plaxico is alright, but he really does take plays off and whines like a little girl when the ball is thrown poorly. Eli will probably stay at the same production this year and Tiki will have another monster year.

Defense-wise, I think Arrington will make some big plays which will make you forget about the TRULY dumbass plays that he'll make most of the year. Pierce will be a monster again. Strahan is on the way out, another year older, another year slower, but he'll still be better then your average DE. Osi's year was a fluke I think due to the pressure put on by Strahan. I doubt he repeats again this year, but I still put them as the top DE duo in the division. The defensive line is still suspect and the CBs look to possibly have improved with the subtraction of Will Allen and signing of Sam Madison. For the Giants sake, I hope Madison isn't one of those old "Skins" signings where they signed a huge contract for a vet on the downslide (a la Bruce Smith).

Speaking purely objectively about the Redskins, the receiving corps as a whole instantly became better than any of them in the NFC East. Moss, second leading receiver in the league, Lloyd had comparatively big numbers for a TOTALLY shitty 49ers team. We all know about Randle El, and his numbers don't even speak to what he'll bring to the table because he played for a run-first team. Randle El instantly gives the Skins a dangerous return man and a trick play threat. Receiving-wise, I think the Giants are second behind the Skins with Shockey as a receiver and the Cowboys a VERY close third because we all know how good TO is (even though he has NO supporting cast). The Redskins offensive line will again be dominant in the running game, and basically the Skins will go as far as Brunell takes them. If he stays healthy, I can realistically see a 13-3 record or better. The defense has been elite the past two years and the Skins signed a number of playmakers on that side.

TMC your all mouth and no substance all you voice is opinion which is fine but don't pass it off as fact .

These are facts ....

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/12400

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/492912

..untill Cooly puts up the consistant #'s and probowls don't open your mouth .

TheMalcolmConnection · 05-15-2006, 08:38 AM

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh MY, don't be fucking coming on HERE and telling ME ANY type of shit. You want consistency, you would think that Cooley has more than proven it so far. I try REALLY hard to not get fired up about football, but someone calling me out like this fucking deserves it. First off, learn how to fucking spell CoolEy, next off, where the fuck did this come from? Cooley would have made Pro Bowls in both years had he not been listed as an "H-Back". If you are all about subtance, you would know this. He's listed as a FULLBACK. Good lookin' out chief. Next off, I would think that I made it adamantly clear my point anyway. Gonzo was the FIRST RECEIVING OPTION FOR THE CHIEFS, Cooley was not. Cooley had far more TDs last year than Gonzo. Cooley also ranked just a few yards lower than the other two "Pro Bowl" candidates of this year and had just as many if not more TDs than all other TEs except for Gates, ALSO a first receiving option for San Diego.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...on=2&year=2005

So don't come in here and call me out on shit like that. Do not EVER fucking tell me to not open my mouth.

TheMalcolmConnection · 05-15-2006, 08:39 AM

LOL. What a way to start a Monday. Getting called out by a holier-than-thou Giants fan.

And Giantone, you USED to be cool.

Giantone · 05-15-2006, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

LOL. What a way to start a Monday. Getting called out by a holier-than-thou Giants fan.

And Giantone, you USED to be cool.

Who called who out Rocky? Look all I said in a post is that you (the Redskins ) did'nt have the same wepons as a matter of fact I said you had the better recievers ,at no point did I attack Cooly he is no Gonzo and untill he's in the pro bowl as a tight end not some made up position like "H back"then he won't be !

Aagin take your opinion and file it ,cause nobody cares .

TheMalcolmConnection · 05-15-2006, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giantone

Who called who out Rocky? Look all I said in a post is that you (the Redskins ) did'nt have the same wepons as a matter of fact I said you had the better recievers ,at no point did I attack Cooly he is no Gonzo and untill he's in the pro bowl as a tight end not some made up position like "H back"then he won't be !

Aagin take your opinion and file it ,cause nobody cares.

Anybody else care what I think?

#56fanatic · 05-15-2006, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Anybody else care what I think?

Not really, you both are a couple of tools.

cpayne5 · 05-15-2006, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Anybody else care what I think?

You know, the funniest thing about Giantone is that everyone but his opinion is false because no facts are involved, yet his own factless opinions are the end all for this discussion. If you don't believe me, just ask him, he'll tell you.

TheMalcolmConnection · 05-15-2006, 09:21 AM

TheMalcolmConnection · 05-15-2006, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

Not really, you both are a couple of tools.

I <3 you.

cpayne5 · 05-15-2006, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

Not really, you both are a couple of tools.

In the land of tools, you're the one that every other tool shuns as just another tool.

TheMalcolmConnection · 05-15-2006, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

Not really, you both are a couple of tools.

LaVar sucks.

TheMalcolmConnection · 05-15-2006, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpayne5

In the land of tools, you're the one that every other tool shuns as just another tool.

HAHA! The venom is ever potent in here today.

#56fanatic · 05-15-2006, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

Not really, you both are a couple of tools.

Just kidding! One a serious note. KC did had the explosive offense with lesser personel. Portis I believe is a better back that Priest(which most redskin fans may agree) Our receivers are definately better. The only area of concern is the QB position. TE is a toss up. I think Cooley has as good of hands as any TE in the NFL. He lacks the experience of finding open spots on the field, which Gonzales was really good at. Back to the QB, I actually believe Brunell will be more effective this year than last, and be a little more rested towards the end of the year. That is of course, if the team picks up this offense and runs it smoothly. We have the pieces to be an AWESOME offense.

Giants - the D has upgraded, no doubt. LaVar, Madison, Demps,Uminori(whatever) another year, RW. But in the playoffs last year, it was your O that gave up. No additions there. Barber is getting older. You do have Eli, who should be better, shockey of course, plaxico, but not another good target. Moss may help later in the year, but not immediately. Toomer is getting old too. Offensive line will probably be solid.

I believe we will beat the G-mens ass twice, thats my opinion, but who really cares.

05-13-2006, 01:43 PM	#107
monk81 The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: TEXAS Posts: 2,029	Re: Is Lavar's Career over? As for the Boyz.........Parcells is already tired of the media asking about T.O. said he won't answer anymore questions about him until July......... I think that T.O. won't cross Parcells path.....but he will get on Bledsoe's case when he doesn't get the ball enough........... __________________ "It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW

05-15-2006, 08:38 AM	#109
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,254	Re: Is Lavar's Career over? Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh MY, don't be fucking coming on HERE and telling ME ANY type of shit. You want consistency, you would think that Cooley has more than proven it so far. I try REALLY hard to not get fired up about football, but someone calling me out like this fucking deserves it. First off, learn how to fucking spell CoolEy, next off, where the fuck did this come from? Cooley would have made Pro Bowls in both years had he not been listed as an "H-Back". If you are all about subtance, you would know this. He's listed as a FULLBACK. Good lookin' out chief. Next off, I would think that I made it adamantly clear my point anyway. Gonzo was the FIRST RECEIVING OPTION FOR THE CHIEFS, Cooley was not. Cooley had far more TDs last year than Gonzo. Cooley also ranked just a few yards lower than the other two "Pro Bowl" candidates of this year and had just as many if not more TDs than all other TEs except for Gates, ALSO a first receiving option for San Diego. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...on=2&year=2005 So don't come in here and call me out on shit like that. Do not EVER fucking tell me to not open my mouth. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

05-15-2006, 08:39 AM	#110
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,254	Re: Is Lavar's Career over? LOL. What a way to start a Monday. Getting called out by a holier-than-thou Giants fan. And Giantone, you USED to be cool. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

05-15-2006, 09:21 AM	#115
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,254	Re: Is Lavar's Career over? __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

Is Lavar's Career over?

Locker Room Main Forum