![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,143
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
I think I watched 5 or 6 plays of this game. Had the Ravens on and then took a nap. I turned on the game right when Sam threw a pick and turned it off. Looked like more garbage football.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 35,999
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
He didn't play bad in the 1st half, 2nd half was rough
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 37
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
I’ve watched every game except this one. Today I went to brunch with my coworkers, got lit and barely thought about the Commies. It was nice.
I’ll be back to my masochism for the last game. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,202
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Dallas will need the win, we will get trounced. Better to get lit and barely think about it (of course I will probably not follow my own advice)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,183
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Sam was a tease today. He made his first big boy throw to a WR beyond 40 yards. Then he shits the bed with terrible INTs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,527
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,009
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Quote:
He was only playing in his first full season in a insanely pass happy offense with a below average offensive line.....I think Sam's the guy and the offense needs to be constructed around him so he can truly settle in.....but there's no guarantee the new GM and HC rolls with him. .
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,471
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Quote:
This team probably wins 4-6 more games if not for the colossal collapse on the defensive side this year. Sam's not going anywhere, but it would be tough to pass on one of the top 2 QBs in the draft. If I were a betting man, I would bet that the new regime drafts CW, DM, or JD. Sam & one of them battle it out for QB1. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
The Starter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK, South
Posts: 1,919
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,009
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Quote:
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,356
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Quote:
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 2,228
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
I'd say it was nailed on we'll take a QB with our 1st pick. I mean, they might get a trade offer to consider, but the new guys can't be the idiots RR etc. have been in assessing value and available talent. So it would have to be a fantastic offer to give up what looks likely to be the #2 overall. And if it is a fantastic offer and they believe it means they can load up the roster in year 1 around Howell, I'm good with that too. If nothing else, what the 49ers have shown this owner first hand is how to use the draft, trades and FA wisely to build a solid roster (with just the Lance debacle as a black mark). Just like the Ravens, the organisation Harris espouses he wants to emulate. Lets hope he gets his wish.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,537
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Quote:
Draft a top QB prospect If they have a willing trade partner, trade back and still get a guy you like later in the first with additional draft capitol or trade back with a willing trade partner take a flier on a late round QB and roll the dice again as we build roster through the draft. We could have the same record next year as we did this year but the team and season could be enjoyable to watch.
__________________
Who does number 2 work for? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 2,228
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Unless it was a really good offer that would make little sense. We know Howell is capable, even if he only ever ends up a backup. He's very cheap and probably warrants extending then trading down the line when his trade value is possibly higher. And he's tough; ideal quality in a backup.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 2,228
|
Re: Forty whiners vs lackeymanders
Lucas has been well rated, I'd definitely say Cosmi, Stromberg and Lucas should be retained. I'd consider Leno but only on a team friendly deal. Everyone else should be gone or, at best, fighting for a place down the depth. We need 2 tackles and a guard in FA or the draft and as Edmund says, probably a veteran centre is a good idea. Isn't Kelce an FA this spring?...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|