![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,990
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Going into preseason again talking about Right Tackle play and question marks makes me wonder why we didnt draft a Tackle in the 3rd round? We coulda still drafted Compton and Gettis, but seemed RT was more of a priority than McRib at C.
This one is on Shanny if we going into the season with JB injured.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
So 1. Allen is now saying there are no trade talks at all. 2. I inquired, and there was a conversation but it did not involve any significant players. Just some minor players and late draft picks being tossed around as part of everyday conversation between GMs.
A "totally inconsequential" conversation is what I've been told
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,258
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Quote:
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Quote:
I did pretty lazy inquiring, didn't cross-check or press the issue or anything. I would say that almost all significant discussions begin as inconsequential (and then build up). And who really knows how truthful Bruce is being I do know we came close, verrrrrrrry close, to flat out releasing Cooley over the weekend. To give him a fair shot elsewhere. So with this trade rumor, I thought well maybe they found a willing partner.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,238
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Quote:
whats up with paulsen? haven't heard his name at all this year
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason." ST21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,258
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Not surprised by this considering all off-season the ES crew has been talking about Cooley being gone either this year or next. My guess is that he'll be hard to trade with that type of price tag on him so releasing him may be the only option. This enforces my belief in getting whatever we can for him while we still can.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Quote:
I don't think there's a chance of the Steelers completing this stupid of a trade with us, but the numbers could work, so it's not impossible. Just 99% unlikely.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Thanks ss
__________________
Just win. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chester
Posts: 90
|
So it sounds like we're trading for John Beck again?
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 65
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Bring back Chewbaca, the former Terp
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DC
Age: 36
Posts: 1,300
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Heard Wallace isn't going to leave Pittsburgh (whether that be because they'll sign him or bench him IDK), but maybe SS has something more?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,258
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Quote:
All one needs to do is look back when Santonio Holmes was in Pittsburgh and was a Super Bowl hero. Instead of signing this guy long term, they shipped him off for a 5th round pick to the Jets. People scratched their heads at the move, but now we see exactly why they made that move. They didn't want to pay a moron and cancer big money so shipping him off for draft pick is the next best thing. It makes you wonder about why the Steelers aren't willing to sign Wallace to a contract. Maybe it is the 11mil/year he wants, or maybe he's a knucklehead they don't want to give that type of coin to? Personally, no way do I think Wallace is worth a Vincent Jackson type contract. Hell, I don't even think Vincent Jackson was worth that type of contract either. No way the Skins would be remotely interested if he's looking for a VJ type contract. If we weren't willing to pay VJ that, than I seriously doubt we would pay Wallace that.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Redskins Talking Trade with Raiders?
Releasing Cooley now as opposed to the off-season, when we could have used his cap space to acquire talent on the market at positions of need, sounds almost bizarre.
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|