11-16-2009, 12:42 PM | #1096 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I don't think you are finding anyone that is saying he should be the QB of the future or that he's doing a good job or anything like that. Hell, I think at best he should be our backup next year because I don't trust Brennan as a backup. I'm sure people like you would love for him to have terrible stats to feel better about your criticism...but just be content with the fact that Campbell will not be the starting QB of the Redskins in 2010 and that just about everyone agrees, ok?
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
Advertisements |
11-16-2009, 12:50 PM | #1097 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
This boat has sailed. JC doesn't pass the eye test. Is this guy a good qb? No. You can watch and see it. He missed on alot yesterday. DT has a TD is the ball is there. SM has a touchdown if the ball is there. Sure, JC had some decent throws yesterday. He made some plays w/ his feet. I'm happy, but JC isn't the long term answer. Did you see Kyle Orton miss any TD's yesterday? Kyle Orton...maybe not even a top 20 NFL qb? Did he miss any throws?
Cutler had a tremendous year last year for being so young. Sanchez is a rookie so the jury is still out. |
11-16-2009, 12:51 PM | #1098 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
11-16-2009, 12:53 PM | #1099 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 1,851
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I'm not even going to bring up the play before the fake punt field goal where Jason pump fakes to his right multiple times and neglects to see Todd Yoder running free down the middle of the field. Or the fact that they were running a cover 2 with the safeties covering the sidelines but Jason doesn't recognize it in time to hit Yoder. I mean the shit that other starting QB's do on a daily basis WITH or WITHOUT "Time" every Sunday.
__________________
Catch me on YouTube ! http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5 The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today" |
|
11-16-2009, 12:55 PM | #1100 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Campbell - 65.4% " Just saying. Orton was playing great before 'Rak got to him, better than JC I can admit. But he did "miss" more throws than JC if we're looking at comp %. We out-passed them as a team 214-185 (thanks, Hunter!) and out-rushed them 174-120.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
11-16-2009, 12:56 PM | #1101 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
11-16-2009, 01:00 PM | #1102 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
11-16-2009, 01:01 PM | #1103 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
11-16-2009, 01:04 PM | #1104 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
I think it's also worth noting that in the all important 'wins' category, Cutler and Sanchez have 4, Campbell 3 so for all of the 'bench JC and we'll start winning' crowd, the evidence really isn't there. Bottom line, as it was in the offseason, training camp and today, Campbell gives us the best chance to win each week.
Every observer of this team acknowledges that while JC is not playing at a high level and makes frustrating errors, he is far from the biggest problem on the offense. For example, Jim Zorn calling plays-13.1 PPG, Sherm Lewis calling plays-20.3 PPG. If we can get some consistent protection we may see even more improvement in Campbell's game.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
11-16-2009, 01:05 PM | #1105 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
I actually think if we re-vamp the line, he COULD be. It's still a wait-and-see about the remainder of the season, but of course, the main point of me tracking the stats is to prove that Cutler and Sanchez were not the answers as I had maintained in the offseason.
What COULD be done is if we can land Colt McCoy AND STILL STRENGTHEN THE LINE, we could let JC start next season with the new line and see if he's up to it, because I do see some potential in him. If he falters, plug in whichever of the two "Colt"s that landed the backup job out of camp. Todd Collins needs to be sent walking. If we can't bolster the line AND get a new QB at the same time this offseason/draft, we need to make the line the top priority.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
11-16-2009, 01:05 PM | #1106 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Before the season about 80% of the ppl in here. just sayin.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
11-16-2009, 01:06 PM | #1107 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
11-16-2009, 01:09 PM | #1108 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I actually find it interesting that Campbell statistically is not doing too bad, yet we know what his play looks on the field. That being said, I agree with Paintrain, right now he gives us the best chance to win (which is a sad indictment of our situation at the QB position). This by no means is saying that he should come back next year...he won't (as I said at best a 2nd stringer).
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
11-16-2009, 01:11 PM | #1109 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
11-16-2009, 01:14 PM | #1110 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
You can see by his numbers that he's an average NFL QB. He's not Jamarcus Russell or Derek Anderson and he's not Peyton Manning or Tom Brady. He's a guy who won't kill you with mistakes and also not dazzle you with amazing plays. If you've got a team that plays smart football, runs well, protects well and needs 2-3 plays from your QB per game, he can be your guy. If you've got a team that struggles to do the little things, can't always move the ball and needs the QB to create plays offensively, he's probably the wrong fit. Right now, we're that second type of team so he's not a good fit for us.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|