Trade Deadline: Any movement?

[Deivybaby]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

Yes, but has Welker ever done this?

LOL 05 was good but my goodness I dont see how any one would take Moss over Welker no body in the NFL would do that . Only us fans.

[los panda]

Originally Posted by Deivybaby

LOL 05 was good but my goodness I dont see how any one would take Moss over Welker no body in the NFL would do that . Only us fans.

i think you need to elaborate on your fantasy scenario.

is moss under contract w the redskins in your scenario?

[Deivybaby]

Originally Posted by SKINS73

Welker is good; however, he's also benefited from defenses focusing on Gronk and Hernandez. Moss had weak QBs AND he was the receiver defenses focused on. It would be difficult to compare the two with any degree of certainty. Personally, I'd like to see Fitzgerald go to the Pack and have Rodgers tossing him the ball. That would be epic.

The Jags-Dolphins-and jets has had good defenses and hes been doing this way before those clowns came to NE.

Lol i remember when people said NO TO T.O in 010 but rather have had Joey Galloway at WR lol or Roydell Williams. Also Wade Phillips being fired and us the fans saying no to him .Lol please man Moss is not that good would rather see Robinson start next year wont say now cause playoff potentials but lets be realistic.

Ill stop the Welker talk because hes not better than Moss lol.

[Deivybaby]

[QUOTE=los panda;953986]i think you need to elaborate on your fantasy scenario.

is moss under contract w the redskins in your scenario?[/QUOTE]

The fact you brought up a contract to say you rather have moss is crazy ,Wes wants a contract because he consistently has had a ton of rec alot of yards and is one of the most consistent players in today NFL . He was even doing this with Matt Cassel so the excuses cant pile up to much he is just good.

I would rather have Welker if how you bring up Slot why not have the best SLot WR today? and it doesnt matter Moss isnt doing that great he had one huge TD in ATL and had two first downs against minny thats it. Wes Welker has 622 yards already but the excuse is he has BRADY and that he is in the slot already lol.

Moss cant hold Welker luckly this is a skins forum if this was a general forum every one would laugh at us. This is as bad as this other site im in with a Bradford vs RG3 thread and the rams still claim RG3 is not better lol thats how i feel about this.

[Meks]

Originally Posted by Deivybaby

To keep this short and sweet would you rather have wes or moss here right now . Slot or no slot.

Moss. for every reason from salary to locker room to scheme fit.

[Meks]

and the Jets is the only GOOD defense on your list for the past 5 years...

name some good corners and LBS miami and jax have had to face welker... lol...

[los panda]

Originally Posted by Deivybaby

The fact you brought up a contract to say you rather have moss is crazy ,Wes wants a contract because he consistently has had a ton of rec alot of yards and is one of the most consistent players in today NFL . He was even doing this with Matt Cassel so the excuses cant pile up to much he is just good.

I would rather have Welker if how you bring up Slot why not have the best SLot WR today? and it doesnt matter Moss isnt doing that great he had one huge TD in ATL and had two first downs against minny thats it. Wes Welker has 622 yards already but the excuse is he has BRADY and that he is in the slot already lol.

Moss cant hold Welker luckly this is a skins forum if this was a general forum every one would laugh at us. This is as bad as this other site im in with a Bradford vs RG3 thread and the rams still claim RG3 is not better lol thats how i feel about this.

everyone is laughing at us anyway. are you able to answer any of my questions?

is moss on the redskins in your scenario?
what kind of contract do you offer welker?
or do you just want welker for the rest of this season?

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by Meks

Moss. for every reason from salary to locker room to scheme fit.

Ditto

[punch it in]

Can we just stop comparing a burner who played the majority of his career with second rate back ups to a slot receiver who played almost every down with a hall of famer. Its ridunkulous.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by htownskinfan

Hell I would in a second.I love Rg3 but Luck is almost as good and i think he will have a better career,I say because RG3's style of play I think will shorten his career because of injury issues

No.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[VegasSkinsFan]

Originally Posted by Pigskins

Rg3 for luck and 3 first rounders, honestly would you do it???

I know I'm going to get killed for this but yes I would. Luck is going to be a great QB in his own right. With the extra picks we could improve much quicker. I think both of them retire with championships, plus I don't think luck has as much injury risk.

Straight up wouldn't even think about it. Three firsts and its a done deal for me.

[FRPLG]

I think the deal that I'd take is probably unrealistic. Any deal would have to include quality young players who I already know are good. Someone like a Patrick Peterson, a proven young QB and a first.

[htownskinfan]

Originally Posted by VegasSkinsFan

I know I'm going to get killed for this but yes I would. Luck is going to be a great QB in his own right. With the extra picks we could improve much quicker. I think both of them retire with championships, plus I don't think luck has as much injury risk.

Straight up wouldn't even think about it. Three firsts and its a done deal for me.

I agree,Thats pretty much exactly what I said

[VegasSkinsFan]

Better question is what would you want for Morris? If the cards offered a first round pick do you take it?

[Rev.SkinsFan]

In a heartbeat