Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Campbell's numbers dont lie

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2009, 12:49 PM   #991
Redskin Warrior
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by warriorzpath View Post
This probably is all true, but when do you hold him accountable for his own actions and the mistakes that was under his control?
I do hold him accountable for overthrows, running into sacks, going threw his progressions to fast, but that doesn't stop me from supporting him. All QB do these things but it's pointed out more when you are on a losing team. JC deserves some criticism but not all of the criticism WR's, RB's, OL, TE's need to come out and say ok we realize our QB is struggling and obviously he doesn't trust us to an extent what can we do better. I realize this comes with the territory but if his teammates come to bat for him and publicly endorse and support him like they did Zorn. I feel that would show JC were not using you as a scapegoat we haven't giving up on you even if they have.
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-31-2009, 01:32 PM   #992
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin Warrior View Post
but if his teammates come to bat for him and publicly endorse and support him like they did Zorn. I feel that would show JC were not using you as a scapegoat we haven't giving up on you even if they have.
I think to a man JC's teammates support him.
I think the people that don't support him are the FO and quasi-fans.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 02:02 PM   #993
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcarey032 View Post
I believe that is due in part because he is pressing. He is trying to make things happen because the offense in general is so stagnate. I can't say that I blame Campbell. You want to stand tall in the pocket, but when you get sacked 6 times and you are probably hit more than double that it is hard to not try and make something happen.
No he's not. In the first half of the Philly game, there were 2 or 3 plays where he had all day to throw, and instead of going downfield, he either checked down or threw to the flat. If he was desperately trying to make something happen, he would have said eff it and let 'er rip. Even during the best streak of his career, the 6-2 start last year, he threw 8 TDs in 8 games. Big whoop. Aside from Brad Johnson and Trent Green, we've started back-up quality QBs for well over a decade now.
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 02:08 PM   #994
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green1 View Post
You guys are funny. Look at the league, ever successful QB, except Flacco and Ryan have been in the same Offensive system for long periods of time. Changing everything every year has not worked yet nor will it ever. The longer the QB is in the same system the more successful he is...look it up.
And look how terrible Brees was when he went to the Saints from the Chargers. It took him a good 5 years to get acclimated. And remember how Brady came in for Bledsoe and screwed everything up. They could have gone far in the playoffs that year if only Brady had more time to learn the system. Pennington sucked last year too when he went to the Dolphins. It's all about time in the system. I agree.
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 02:11 PM   #995
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green1 View Post
New QB means at least two more years of losing. New QB + learning a new Offense + bad O-Line = New Coach which brings us to our current position again.
It's OK. I don't think fans care so much about losing, as long as they're building up to something. I'd gladly suffer through a 3 year re-building process if it meant we were a perennial contender for the next 10-15 years and had a true franchise QB we never had to bicker about.
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 04:49 PM   #996
warriorzpath
Registered User
 
warriorzpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Awful pocket presence leading to undue pressure? Really? You think JC is causing the pressure and sacks? Okay.
LoL, JC pocket presence or lack thereof at the start of the game is due to previous games lack of protection.
Although JC had pressure the fumble was his fault the onus is always on the ball carrier to protect the ball.
Missed 'big' play? Dude, every QB misses some plays, they pointed out McNabb missing a 'big' play.
I started to express some points to counter your responses with all that you said (and not what I have just quoted you on), but I feel like I'm repeating myself.

All I want to ask to you is - do you agree with some others on here that jason campbell is playing very well this season?

Then I can see where you're at in the way you are thinking.
warriorzpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 05:03 PM   #997
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
I think to a man JC's teammates support him.
I think the people that don't support him are the FO and quasi-fans.
Are you his agent?
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 03:43 PM   #998
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by warriorzpath View Post
I started to express some points to counter your responses with all that you said (and not what I have just quoted you on), but I feel like I'm repeating myself.

All I want to ask to you is - do you agree with some others on here that jason campbell is playing very well this season?

Then I can see where you're at in the way you are thinking.

JC is the 18th ranked QB in the NFL.

JC is playing about as well as can be expected given the circumstances.

Being the QB for this Redskins team with the OL issues, lack of a ground game and suspect coaching/playcalling is not conducive to playing very well.

Barring a strong second half (not just stats but with wins and a general upward trend of the team), JC will be starting for someone next year.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 03:44 PM   #999
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Are you his agent?
Are you a troll?
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 03:46 PM   #1000
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Are you a troll?
Are you mad and have an inflated ego?

Systems don't make you inaccurate, being inaccurate does.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 04:42 PM   #1001
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
I think to a man JC's teammates support him.
I think the people that don't support him are the FO and quasi-fans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Are you his agent?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Are you a troll?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Are you mad and have an inflated ego?
Are you talking about yourself?
Don't be mad b/c i called you a troll, which is what you are.

HTTR!
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 04:54 PM   #1002
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Are you talking about yourself?
Don't be mad b/c i called you a troll, which is what you are.

HTTR!
Apparently you can't handle forums and interaction with people, stick to the paper kid.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 05:04 PM   #1003
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Apparently you can't handle forums and interaction with people, stick to the paper kid.
I'm going to stop responding to your trolling.
We've sidetracked this thread enough.
And your posts have added nothing to this thread.

In the future you should have something to say about football, then post.

HTTR!
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 05:06 PM   #1004
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
I'm going to stop responding to your trolling.
We've sidetracked this thread enough.
And your posts have added nothing to this thread.

In the future you should have something to say about football, then post.

HTTR!
Did you just learn that word today?

You conveniently didn't include any of my quotes about his play, you even took part of a post that you quoted out
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 06:07 PM   #1005
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Aaron Rodgers OL 'sucking' is a bit overblown.
Even during the game against the Vikes i recall Jaws saying how he caused some of those sacks, although i didn't agree with him.
Anyone watching the Vikes-Pack game?

Because Aikman has twice reaffirmed what Jaws was saying about Aaron Rodgers causing some of the sacks in the 1st Vikings game.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.70141 seconds with 10 queries