09-14-2009, 03:38 AM | #76 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
I think the D did a good job considering the offence couldn't move the ball. They only gave up one touchdown, the offence gave up the other. Campbell sustain drives give the D rest and I think we could go all the way baby.
|
Advertisements |
09-14-2009, 04:25 AM | #77 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Couldn't say it better. Both units sucked equally!!
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company |
09-14-2009, 05:15 AM | #78 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 389
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
The big issue I have with the defense was that 4th quarter drive that seemed to go on for ever . The Giants came away with 3 points but took off 7 minutes off the clock .
Poor tackling in the secondary will have to be addressed, they need to play closer on third down . Manningham should have been stopped by Smoot but he missed, Carter was too slow to the edge and Hall was flat out embarressed . Horton was too aggressive he took himself out of too many plays, Orakopo was a none factor . One comedy moment was on one play where we got penetration and two or three Skins were in the backfield quickly and everyone seemed shocked and paused long enough for Eli to take off and Landry was looking for revenge everytime he was in 30 yards of Barber ... All that said though the D did have its high points . It not allow a 100 yard receiver ...held the best rushing attack in the NFL in 2008 to 103 yards total . Barber had an average of 2.9 yards per carry and fletcher played out of his socks today ... but that is all going to be overlooked ... |
09-14-2009, 07:22 AM | #79 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Quote:
|
|
09-14-2009, 08:50 AM | #80 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
1 ) Our offense did not score a TD until the game was ... over . 2 ) our Defense could not get off the field against what was an average offense at the end of 08 after Burress.
|
09-14-2009, 09:14 AM | #81 |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
If I were Blache, I think I would start FINING anyone who tries to "chip" instead of a REAL tackle that actually puts the ball carrier on the ground...........Killing us
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
09-14-2009, 09:19 AM | #82 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
D didn't play great and they obviously were on the field too long. Can't say they were a total disappointment though. The Giants have probably the best OL in the league and Manning is craftier than people give him credit for.
|
09-14-2009, 09:19 AM | #83 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 72
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
I didn't expect the Skins to win, but I did expect them to play disciplined, mistake free football with some attitude. Were my expectations too high?
|
09-14-2009, 10:21 AM | #84 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: dc area
Posts: 78
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Quote:
The real question is why in the last couple of years do the skins have to play perfect football to win games. JC and some of the defensive players get some of the blame with poor decision making. To me 95% of the blame goes to Zorn and Blache. They both called a horrible game and didn't do much to put the players in a position to win. If they would have called better plays/scheme they could have easily beat the Giants. Zorn set the tone(really lost the game) of the game the minute he wanted A.R. to throw a pass to Moss instead of Campbell or running the ball. A.R gets sacked and they lose 10 yards after Portis gain 30 yds(I think). Imagine if they would have scored a td during that possession. It would have be 7-3 skins and I think game would have had a different momentum and outcome. |
|
09-14-2009, 10:26 AM | #85 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 351
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
I wouldnt say that they were that bad. Last I checked most teams score 10-14 points in 2 red-zone trips, not 3. They could have started out 14 nothing then got the other 14 points and been up 31-7 at the half. Chris Horton was playing way to far up on a lot of plays, but the rest of the defensive backs were fine.
|
09-14-2009, 10:40 AM | #86 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Crafty is a good way to describe him. He's nowhere near the elite QB that some people claim he is, but he makes an efficient play when he needs to.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
09-14-2009, 10:58 AM | #87 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
I guess I could nit pick a few things but the biggest thing that stands out was allowing the Giants to have that long drive in the 4th. Still the D held them to only 16 points and stuffed them in the red zone twice. This loss is on the O.
|
09-14-2009, 11:18 AM | #88 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 121
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
The DBs are playing to far off the WRs. D. Hall is getting roasted almost ever play. Should have kept springs. D-Line has to get more pressure, Orakpo needs to be @ DE not linebacker
|
09-14-2009, 11:23 AM | #89 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Quote:
|
|
09-14-2009, 11:35 AM | #90 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Quote:
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
|
|
|