![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
does anyone have Gary Clark's career stats? and that theory is baloney, because we can say that Emmitt Smith was more of a threat then Irvin. and what memorable catch does Irvin have? i really cant see any justification for monk not being elected
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#77 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
I can see where Irish is coming from with this. It is more of an argument of popularity....staying in the publics eye and reminding them of who you are, rather than to let your actions as a player and a person speak for themselves. If Monk got into the broadcast both Sunday in and Sunday, he would have been selected years ago. But, because he chose to take the road of being a normal person, walking away from the game completely and enjoying his life with his family, that isn't as impressive looking to the media. Until that changes, the selection process of the Hall of Fame will always be broken.
In a perfect world, players are chosen according to how they were as a player AND how they were as a person. By selecting players to the HoF, we are basically saying, these are the greatest players/persons to ever play the game of football. These guys are worthy of your worship. Now of course, I don't believe anybody is worthy of worship except for Jesus Christ, but you get the picture. Those who select these HoFer's don't consider substance abuse, violent and/or homicidal tendencies, being arrested......I believe a true Hall of Fame does look at the personal factors. I think is should be so selective, that only a very few should get in. Heck, there might only be one person who gets in per year, but that is the only way the HoF would be credible in my opinion.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
i am the opposite of this. i think players should be judged solely on the ability to play whatever sport they are talented in. but going strictly by stats alone, how is monk not in?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
Mark Schlereth (sp) (former Skin) just totally ripped the voters on ESPN for not voting Art Monk in. He said he was personally dumbfounded and called the 39 voters "clowns".
He was so livid, he referred to Monk as James Arthur Monk,...hillarious! He said no wide receiver deserves to be in the Hall before Monk, Irvin included. I was suprised that he called out Irvin like that. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81 |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
a redskin won't get to the hall until danny is no longer our owner. It is a bias agianst Danny and the whole team has to suffer. these same guys who say it is time for monk to get in on tv probrally sit in that room and vote agianst him when it is all said and done
__________________
That got ugly fast |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 513
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
Monk had no memorable catches? The most memorable thing about Michael Irvin catching the ball was that he most likely had just finished pushing off the DB.
I fear that Monk's chances at the Hall slip each year he is denied. I can see myself explaining to my son how great this guy was when Monk is in the "seniors" pool in 2025... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
There has to be some serious, well thought out protest as to why Monk hasn't been elected.
Let's face it, the media has spoken out; From ESPN to Fox to the NFL Today on down to the local sports pundits. I've heard them all get about as angry as one can get on public television. I've heard non-Redskins such as Howie Long, Tom Jackson, Steve Young, to just about every former Skin and coach make their thoughts known and what a travesty this is. Now how is it that all of these people, non-football and tons of former players are wrong, and yet these 39 so called 'writers' are correct? Art Monk was Jerry Rice before Jerry Rice was. Art Monk personified class back then, the way people oooh and ahhh over Marvin Harrison today. Every single year when he get's snubbed, it's as if it's a suprise, but yet it isn't. He's constantly at the top of the 'snubbed' lists. Soooo...if the media gets it, and they've chimed in, the Skins from top to bottom have voiced their opinion, we're really the only ones left to take a firm stance on the issue. I don't know, guys. But what I do know is, if Monk gets elected to Canton next year or next week!, it still won't be the same to me - it just won't. The Hall of Fame means nothing to me now. It's just a building, a hollow building filled with nothing more than football memorabilia, yet no real sense of respect for the game or the players that have made it great. They should really turn it into some type of "museum" or perhaps a 'throwback' football jersey store. I really mean that. There is no way one can rightfully justify calling it the pro football hall of fame, and not elect the players that have made the biggest statistical contribution and have epitomized professionlism. It's funny because many of Monk's stats are in the hall, but he isn't. Frankly, I think Art has probably moved on at this point. He's said nothing, as well he shouldn't. But the fans have to say something, and not on these dumb ass polls that the same guys who do the voting control. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton (as in Portis) New Jersey
Age: 63
Posts: 217
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 41
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
what's so great about art anyways? all abstract and shit.
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
You know what is absolute proof that the Hall voting is horseshit?
Stallworth and Swann are Hall of Famers. The fact that those two are in and Monk isn't shows that the Hall of Fame has zero credibility. catches - yards - TDs - Pro-bowls - Championships Monk 940- 12721 - 68 - 3 - 3 Stallworth 537 - 8723 - 63 - 3 4 Swann 336 - 5462 - 51 - 3 - 4 Just for a frame of reference.... Clark 699 - 10856 - 68 - 4 - 2 and last but not least.... Every prostitute's favorite family man.... The Captain of Crack/Cocaine. Michael Irvin Irvin 750 - 11904 - 65 - 5 - 3 Monk even beats Captain Crackpipe in every category except Pro-bowls (another beauty contest). The Hall of Fame 90% popularity and 10% production. Hall of Fame voters can go f*ck themselves if you ask me. In reality, the award means nothing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
Going strictly by stats alone, there is no excuse. How the person plays the game can be interpreted in several different ways. Both WRs helped their team to win 3 Super Bowl championships, so Irvins has no edge there. As far as making spectacular catches, well, that is a matter of opinion. No matter how one will try to argue against Monk, there are just as many reasons...actually twice as many reasons for Monk to be in the HoF. It comes down to the fact that Michael Irvins is keeping himself fresh in the media's mind by being a football analyst. If Monk had done the samething, he would have been in the Hall much sooner. It's really all about hall of fame voting being a big fat joke. If you give the media what they want, they will return the favor. If you fall off the face of the earth after your career, you are forgotten. It is just as simple as that. That is why I say those who vote players in should take the player as a person in as high of regards, as the guy being the football player. As much as I loved Manley's aggression on the field, I would not support him being in the HoF with the way he led is life off the field. The same could be said for the original L.T. I believe truly great players are those who were great players on the field, and great people off the field. Those are the guys I'd want my kids looking up to.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
Wildcard Bitches
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 2,638
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
I'm so effin pissed. I've spent way to much time commiserating with basically everyone that isn't a HOF voter.
I'm so disgusted with the NFL right now.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
^21^
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
|
Re: Art Monk Denied Admission to the HoF
NFL should tighten up on PRO BOWL and HOF admissions. TOTAL BS. Makes me wanna get into the NBA or something more fun, cause this shzit it BS!!!
__________________
^21^ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|