01-02-2007, 01:43 PM | #76 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: sean taylor???
Quote:
He has missed a lot of tackles. But still, had he made half of those tackles, gosh, he would have had like 120something tackles! The real point is, he had very little help from the front seven. |
|
Advertisements |
01-02-2007, 01:54 PM | #77 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: sean taylor???
i dont argue that, at all
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
01-02-2007, 04:09 PM | #78 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 41
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: sean taylor???
that means that others are missing tackles. which ST then has to make
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
01-09-2007, 05:39 PM | #79 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: sean taylor???
Someone said there weren't three safeties he would take over Sean Taylor even with his shortcomings being exposed this year. Consider please:
Ed Reed Brian Dawkins Troy Polamalu Roy Williams (???) He has the same coverage deficiencies as ST. Bob Sanders Yeremiah Bell Michael Boulware (???) Mike Brown Donovan Darius There are seven I'd take over Taylor right now in 2007 and two others who I'd have to think about for a while. And if I went team-by-team to look at rosters, I might come up with a couple of others... Here's my idea for the Redskins defense next year: 1. Tell Sean Taylor to add 20 pounds of muscle in the off-season because he's going to be an outside linebacker next year. 2. Find a safety somewhere who can COVER people and then let Archuletta be the safety who does run support and handles the slower tight-end/fullback coverage assignments. 3. While Taylor has prodigious physical skills, I suspect that he does not have the instincts/mental acumen to be a safety because when you get suckered in at safety the result is a LONG game or a TD. If you get suckered in at LB, there's still help behind you.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
01-09-2007, 09:12 PM | #80 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 293
|
Re: sean taylor???
Quote:
|
|
01-09-2007, 09:25 PM | #81 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: sean taylor???
Quote:
I do like the idea of letting Taylor play some linebacker (didn't he do this some against the Giants?) and moving our safeties around. Feel free to dismiss but what if they actually gave Archuleta some playing time by letting him line up at FS if Taylor lines up at LB. That would also be predicated on Springs, Fox, Vincent and or Prieleau bieng able to handle the coverage duties back there. Seems like a logical package in run situations. |
|
01-09-2007, 09:56 PM | #82 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: sean taylor???
When's the last time anyone has seen a player who has played safety at a satisfactory level in the NFL convert to LB? I can think of some college lb's who converted to safety in the NFL (boulware) but not the other way around... This is similar to those who call for Michael Vick to be turned into a running back. It's just not going to happen. Taylor's performance level regressed this year, along with every other member of the defensive squad. That is a sign of a deficiency in coaching, not a reduction in his or their abilities to play their respective positions.
|
01-09-2007, 10:01 PM | #83 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: sean taylor???
Quote:
I am also thinking that if Archuleta stays, he has to do more than protect the punter. He would be better at FS than SS. Thomas Davis played LB this year for the Panthers (not very well but he did do it). |
|
01-10-2007, 12:15 AM | #84 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: sean taylor???
Quote:
|
|
01-10-2007, 01:20 AM | #85 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: sean taylor???
Quote:
|
|
01-10-2007, 11:36 AM | #86 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: sean taylor???
Quote:
|
|
01-10-2007, 11:41 AM | #87 |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: sean taylor???
I agree Hess, he and some others are playing out of position to try and reinforce other weak area's. It's hard to pick out exactly what is wrong with our D this year. It's ALL wrong
ST is a rare player! he is genuinely feared by those that travel his area. We have all seen it time and again. Fix some of the MANY D problems,and we will see it again #1310
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
01-10-2007, 12:46 PM | #88 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 45
Posts: 271
|
Re: sean taylor???
Guys,
We almost drafted Winslow at # 5. Thank god we got Taylor!! Sean needs better coaching. It seems like he's thinking too much out there. He also got smoked by double moves way too much for a third year player. With that being said, I wouldn't trade him for anyone out there today but maybe Ed Reed. Ed Reed has created so many more turnovers in his years in the NFL. Look up how many turnovers that guy creates, its simply amazing. Dawkins is a beast but too old. Sean is extremely young and such a raw talent. He needs to ball hawk more! Dude, with the way that guy can run why not get him the ball on Special Teams or Offense more???? Maybe that's a little crazy!! The guy is the heart and soul of our Defense. He's hardnosed and nobody can hit like he can. Coach him up and next year he's gonna dominate like we all wanted this year. GO ST!!!!!! |
01-10-2007, 12:58 PM | #89 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: sean taylor???
Quote:
This is probably the best post I've read summing up Taylor's season. While his wasn't a good one overall, I think 111 tackles, which led all NFL safties and many linebackers, should say a lot about our defense as a whole and how it performed. Taylor shouldn't be moved to linebacker, he should stay exactly where he is. |
|
01-10-2007, 03:03 PM | #90 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: sean taylor???
The reason I would try to convert him to linebacker is because Sean Taylor spent a lot of time chasing opponents into the end zone this year. His tackling angles werenot always on target and his open field tackling isn't all that great unless he gets a run at a player and can try to blow the oppenent up. Go back and watch the games against the Eagles; Taylor is out of position on pass plays lots of times. Go back and watch the games against the Giants - particularly the second one; Tiki Barber runs amok because of two or three missed tackles by Taylor.
I'm not saying he's a bad player; he's not. But he's playing a position where the things that he does not do well wind up as long gains or TDs for the opponent. I think he might be much better used as a linebacker. I think that conversion would be easier then trying to teach him how to cover people and not bite on fakes so often. I think that conversion would be easier than trying to teach him to tackle in the open field instead of always trying to knock the other player out.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
|