Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Another D.Hall Thread.

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2012, 03:52 PM   #76
CrustyRedskin
Playmaker
 
CrustyRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,057
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

Hes not that bad. Crusty out.
__________________
Lafayette, we're here.

HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14.
CrustyRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-29-2012, 04:02 PM   #77
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,982
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
^^ The issues with his tackling are clearly overblown as indicated by PFF. He's actually a good tackler for a corner.
Seriously.

Did you see who ended up in the piss poor tackling: "which was only saved from rock bottom by Kevin Barnes from the Redskins, who missed one for every 3.9 attempts"

Our old friend Barnes...jeez
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 04:06 PM   #78
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

WTF is Pro Football Focus?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 04:07 PM   #79
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
WTF is Pro Football Focus?
A really cool website with football stats.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 04:15 PM   #80
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
A really cool website with football stats.
Well yes...I figured that but since I've never even heard of it it makes me care little about their rating system.
You may as well worry about how Dan McKlurken rates him?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 04:19 PM   #81
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

PFF is legit, they provide some really interesting analysis.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 04:23 PM   #82
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

Well then I guess we've already lost half our games beacuse of D. Hall.
Guess I'll just go watch Olympic reruns.
:smashfrea
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 05:29 PM   #83
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
Well then I guess we've already lost half our games beacuse of D. Hall.
Guess I'll just go watch Olympic reruns.
:smashfrea
Sad thing is that our secondary just might be responsible for most of our losses this year though.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 05:36 PM   #84
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Sad thing is that our secondary just might be responsible for most of our losses this year though.
I don't know buddy...the secondary could/should gel as the season progresses because it's under new tutelage and the starting safeties are new. More potential there than last season and so far we've seen some real tough-nosed football out of Merriwether and Jackson. Williams is the head-scratcher to me.

Looking at the cornerbacks I think Wilson and Hall will only give up TDs against elite receivers. But that's what makes those types (Fitz, Johnson etc) elite. You need an elite corner to cover an elite receiver.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 05:39 PM   #85
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Sad thing is that our secondary just might be responsible for most of our losses this year though.
I think it will depend on the defensive coach's philosophy and our pass rush. If Kerrigan and Orakpo can get to the QB constantly, then that will disguise our poor secondary. However, if Haslett continues to be blitz happy and leave our mediocre secondary one-on-one with receivers...then we're going to have a problem.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 08:10 PM   #86
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,062
I hear ya both. I do like raheem morris probably having some sort of control over hasletts blitz happy ways. I remember last year hearing about area 51 all over again, so ill wait to see how our safety play goes. I would agree it cant be worse though. Also i think alot of people like to point to the giants and the "in" thing to say this year is " hell if u can get to the qb than eff the secondary. Ive said it myself. Its just not that simple though. Elite wr's will burn a cb the same way elite qb's will burn a good rush with mobility and a quick release. Vick romo and eli happen to be pretty good qb's. Really hoping one or two of the young guys in our secondary surprise the hell out of us. Now that im done playing devils advocate i will play the eternal optimist. We were within inches in several games last year from winning and could have won eleven with sexy rexy and beck! the one thing i cant argue is "as a team" we have upgraded. So lets see if these guys cant win the close ones in the fourth quarter this year.

Last edited by punch it in; 08-29-2012 at 08:26 PM.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 09:34 PM   #87
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
LOL..as we go onto page five of said thread.
Nothing new isn't the same as nothing controversial. There's plenty of controversial things to say about Hall, just, nothing that wasn't true three years ago. Exact same guy.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012, 12:10 AM   #88
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Nothing new isn't the same as nothing controversial. There's plenty of controversial things to say about Hall, just, nothing that wasn't true three years ago. Exact same guy.
His beard is fuller. Beards make you look slow.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012, 01:32 AM   #89
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.

How many INTs does Hall have to make this season to earn another contract here (your opinion and then if you think it's different for the FO)?

I phrase the question that way because Hall's tackling and burn factor are probably constants, but he could certainly come away with more picks lining up differently.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012, 07:44 AM   #90
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
How many INTs does Hall have to make this season to earn another contract here (your opinion and then if you think it's different for the FO)?

I phrase the question that way because Hall's tackling and burn factor are probably constants, but he could certainly come away with more picks lining up differently.
Tough question. Depends on draft and free agency. Also on what these young guns do this season as to how expendable he becomes If he lines up at nickel and is not as exposed than i would say he has to come away with at least five picks to be considered a major factor in his new role. I think this goes for front office as well. I just want to add i dont think
Its going to come down to strictly int's - but five would be a good measure and solid result.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.13665 seconds with 10 queries