08-29-2012, 03:52 PM | #76 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,057
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
Hes not that bad. Crusty out.
__________________
Lafayette, we're here. HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14. |
Advertisements |
08-29-2012, 04:02 PM | #77 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,996
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
Quote:
Did you see who ended up in the piss poor tackling: "which was only saved from rock bottom by Kevin Barnes from the Redskins, who missed one for every 3.9 attempts" Our old friend Barnes...jeez
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
08-29-2012, 04:06 PM | #78 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
WTF is Pro Football Focus?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
08-29-2012, 04:07 PM | #79 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
A really cool website with football stats.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
08-29-2012, 04:15 PM | #80 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
Well yes...I figured that but since I've never even heard of it it makes me care little about their rating system.
You may as well worry about how Dan McKlurken rates him?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
08-29-2012, 04:19 PM | #81 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
PFF is legit, they provide some really interesting analysis.
|
08-29-2012, 04:23 PM | #82 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
Well then I guess we've already lost half our games beacuse of D. Hall.
Guess I'll just go watch Olympic reruns. :smashfrea
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
08-29-2012, 05:29 PM | #83 |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,063
|
|
08-29-2012, 05:36 PM | #84 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
Quote:
Looking at the cornerbacks I think Wilson and Hall will only give up TDs against elite receivers. But that's what makes those types (Fitz, Johnson etc) elite. You need an elite corner to cover an elite receiver.
__________________
24-34 |
|
08-29-2012, 05:39 PM | #85 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
I think it will depend on the defensive coach's philosophy and our pass rush. If Kerrigan and Orakpo can get to the QB constantly, then that will disguise our poor secondary. However, if Haslett continues to be blitz happy and leave our mediocre secondary one-on-one with receivers...then we're going to have a problem.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
08-29-2012, 08:10 PM | #86 |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,063
|
I hear ya both. I do like raheem morris probably having some sort of control over hasletts blitz happy ways. I remember last year hearing about area 51 all over again, so ill wait to see how our safety play goes. I would agree it cant be worse though. Also i think alot of people like to point to the giants and the "in" thing to say this year is " hell if u can get to the qb than eff the secondary. Ive said it myself. Its just not that simple though. Elite wr's will burn a cb the same way elite qb's will burn a good rush with mobility and a quick release. Vick romo and eli happen to be pretty good qb's. Really hoping one or two of the young guys in our secondary surprise the hell out of us. Now that im done playing devils advocate i will play the eternal optimist. We were within inches in several games last year from winning and could have won eleven with sexy rexy and beck! the one thing i cant argue is "as a team" we have upgraded. So lets see if these guys cant win the close ones in the fourth quarter this year.
Last edited by punch it in; 08-29-2012 at 08:26 PM. |
08-29-2012, 09:34 PM | #87 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
Nothing new isn't the same as nothing controversial. There's plenty of controversial things to say about Hall, just, nothing that wasn't true three years ago. Exact same guy.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
08-30-2012, 12:10 AM | #88 |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,063
|
|
08-30-2012, 01:32 AM | #89 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Another D.Hall Thread.
How many INTs does Hall have to make this season to earn another contract here (your opinion and then if you think it's different for the FO)?
I phrase the question that way because Hall's tackling and burn factor are probably constants, but he could certainly come away with more picks lining up differently.
__________________
24-34 |
08-30-2012, 07:44 AM | #90 | |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 23,063
|
Quote:
Its going to come down to strictly int's - but five would be a good measure and solid result. |
|
|
|