|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: WTF Pick of Day One | |||
WR Devin Thomas (34) | 18 | 12.00% | |
TE Fred Davis (48) | 95 | 63.33% | |
WR Malcolm Kelly (51) | 37 | 24.67% | |
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-27-2008, 11:58 AM | #856 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
04-27-2008, 12:01 PM | #857 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2008, 12:07 PM | #858 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Thomas was rated as first round talent and was projected to possibly go as high as #11 to Buffalo. I don't think he would have been a reach even at #21, to get him where we did was fantastic.
|
04-27-2008, 12:09 PM | #859 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2008, 12:11 PM | #860 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
|
04-27-2008, 12:12 PM | #861 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
You've had a pretty nice season, but you haven't proved that it can be repeated. You have a year of eligibility left, why not return to school, get better at your trade, and help your college team win? If nothing else, we can tell that Devin Thomas was more interested in a pay day than becoming the best wide receiver he can be. Perhaps I'm wrong on him, and he will be good enough to start in this league. But either way, I'm tired of adding players who are in it for the money. Obviously to an extent, everyones in it for the money. But that didn't stop most players from waiting a year and improving themselves so that they could become the best they could be. Thomas doesn't seem to be worried about improving himself. Malcolm Kelly came out early, but his touchdown production went from 2, to 10, to 9. He's done it multiple years and is a far superior prospect to Thomas. I'm sorry to hate on your guy's parade with reality, but we took a guy on hype, and that rarely works out.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
04-27-2008, 12:13 PM | #862 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
If Zorn intends on using a lot of 3 and 4 WR sets and rotating these guys in and out depending on the packages it makes sense. Not sure how you can have overkill when you look at the mediocre WR production we had last year. I think this draft indicates the shift in philosophy from Gibbs run first mentality to Zorn's offense which looks like it's going to be pass heavy.
|
04-27-2008, 12:14 PM | #863 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
I think Moss has the ability to be dominant when healthy. In those last three games you mention Moss had 15 catches for 271 yards. That works out to a 16 game pace of 80 catches for 1445 yards. I distinctly remember Moss making great adjustments on the ball on two passes thrown along the sideline in the Giants game. I should mentioned that Moss caught 3 balls for 75 yards (a 25 yard avg.) on a night when Collins barely threw because it was so windy. I also remember Moss making a great adjustment on the ball and beating Vikings CB Marcus McCauley for a TD. Moss undoubtedly has the initial explosiveness off the line, the straight-line speed, and agility you'd like to see from a burner. Moss is excellent at adjusting to the ball. Moss' only real problem is that he has trouble staying healthy (which is, admittedly, a big problem). |
|
04-27-2008, 12:17 PM | #864 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2008, 12:18 PM | #865 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
Irregardless of the talent we got, there were a few dissenting opinions making the decisions, and it created overkill. If we had just drafted Thomas, and then Davis (one TE, and one WR), can you come up with a potential scenario where we wouldn't have it covered with the personnel we had? Kelly was a good value, but his only role on this team comes if he can beat out Devin Thomas. I suppose that 4 years down the road, the team is planning to have Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly at the receivers, but in the next three seasons, Moss and/or ARE are still going to be here, and that means that one of those guys is nothing more than a 4th receiver for the time being. That would be the very definition of overkill.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
04-27-2008, 12:20 PM | #866 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
GTripp,
Do you think we took Thomas because of the hype? Thomas is 6'2", has 4.4 speed, is very strong and agile, has good hands, is tough, and puts up excellent stats in 2007. It sounds like he's unpolished and it might not work out, but that's probably why we passed on him @ 21. We used our #2 pick to draft a boom/bust wideout. |
04-27-2008, 12:23 PM | #867 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
I wasn't attacking the Redskins' decision to draft 2 wideouts and a TE. I was simply disagreeing with the statement that Moss is an average receiver at best when healthy.
|
04-27-2008, 12:23 PM | #868 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
It is what it is, the Skins have made their picks i was not fond of them at first but the more i think about it i like it i like it alot, make defenses really have to plan for us.
|
04-27-2008, 12:25 PM | #869 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2008, 12:26 PM | #870 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
i'm tired of goal line situations run run run and everyone knows it what do you think we will do now exactly the possibilites are endless you don't know just like other defenses won't know
|
|
|