When is Enough ,Enough?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

He's a psychopath who murdered probably 100k + of his own country men.

Do you want him with 30-50 nuclear weapons on delivery systems that can reach the U.S. as well as other allies across the world?

So which is it, military force in reducing the threat or a diplomatic path?

Or you want the Obama way of doing nothing...the wait and see approach?

......or you can do it the trump way and have a fuckin psychopath make you look like a fucking fool.


https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...ials/23471506/


North Korea has increased nuclear production at secret sites, say officials

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

......or you can do it the trump way and have a fuckin psychopath make you look like a fucking fool.


https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...ials/23471506/


North Korea has increased nuclear production at secret sites, say officials

Not a very secret site. Trump has said all along that we would continue the talks only if NK is a good actor. We havent made any concessions that can't be reversed simply. That's how you deal with an untrustworthy partner. All the more reason why Trump's negotiation style is suited to NK. If they continue the wrong path then we have sticks (restarting war games) that are not escalatory in nature but send a clear message that lack of substance will not help NKs cause.

[MTK]

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44666242

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44666242

Lol...that dude is good. G1 one should give his boy a call.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Lol...that dude is good. G1 one should give his boy a call.

.........what boy?


Your post's of recent have me thinking you might have this...................



The Eddie Haskell Syndrome | The wonderful world of Captain Snark

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

.........what boy?


Your post's of recent have me thinking you might have this...................



The Eddie Haskell Syndrome | The wonderful world of Captain Snark

G1 it was a joke man. Lawd! Light hearted..dude chill.

U wouldn’t call bigly?

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Speaking of disgusting...............


https://thinkprogress.org/trump-just...-4ba95e7ce0be/

I saw that too. Personally, I have no idea if this is some quid-pro-quo deal or not but if it is I hope Mueller's investigation wraps it up before the next Justice is confirmed. I fully expect it to be in line with Trump's nominating the worst possible guy/gal for critical positions. Still, even if there are too many "incidental" coincidences I don't expect anything to come of it. We are looking at a conservative SC for the next 30-40 years imo.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

G1 it was a joke man. Lawd! Light hearted..dude chill.

U wouldn’t call bigly?

.............who use's the word "dude" anymore???

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mooby

I saw that too. Personally, I have no idea if this is some quid-pro-quo deal or not but if it is I hope Mueller's investigation wraps it up before the next Justice is confirmed. I fully expect it to be in line with Trump's nominating the worst possible guy/gal for critical positions. Still, even if there are too many "incidental" coincidences I don't expect anything to come of it. We are looking at a conservative SC for the next 30-40 years imo.

Yes more conspiracy theories. I’m sure it’s true.

Mitch told your party, obama, and you the voter you would live to regret this and you would regret it sooner than you think.

Your party should have never change the rules.

Dems need to own it now. And they need to explain it to you and all the Democratic voters...they owe you that. Unless somehow you agreed with basic stupidity of the move. The question now is, why the hell is the same democrats in power of the party?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by mooby

I saw that too. Personally, I have no idea if this is some quid-pro-quo deal or not but if it is I hope Mueller's investigation wraps it up before the next Justice is confirmed. I fully expect it to be in line with Trump's nominating the worst possible guy/gal for critical positions. Still, even if there are too many "incidental" coincidences I don't expect anything to come of it. We are looking at a conservative SC for the next 30-40 years imo.

Yup and the trumplings will march right along with it as long as it takes down the country the trump cult is happy.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

I saw that too. Personally, I have no idea if this is some quid-pro-quo deal or not but if it is I hope Mueller's investigation wraps it up before the next Justice is confirmed. I fully expect it to be in line with Trump's nominating the worst possible guy/gal for critical positions. Still, even if there are too many "incidental" coincidences I don't expect anything to come of it. We are looking at a conservative SC for the next 30-40 years imo.

Originally Posted by Giantone

Yup and the trumplings will march right along with it as long as it takes down the country the trump cult is happy.

Ok. I have read that article several times and still cannot make the conspiracy connection that you two seem to see.

If i understand right Kennedy's son would be in a huge position to damage Trump due to his work at DB on Trump's dealings. And clearly if Kennedy's son had knowledge of damaging evidence I think it is reasonable to think he would let his father know not to Trust Trump. If Kennedy was told by his son not to trust Trump, I doubt Kennedy would resign, instead staying on the bench adjudicate any Mueller rulings. I guess maybe you could see him stepping down so he would not have to recuse himself thus opening Mueller rulings subject to a potential 4-4 tie. But retiring and allowing Trump to select his successor seems like a draconian way to avoid that outcome.

G1, progressives and socialists are the ones leading this country down a fate like the old USSR and every other economy that has taken up socialism as their banner.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Ok. I have read that article several times and still cannot make the conspiracy connection that you two seem to see.

If i understand right Kennedy's son would be in a huge position to damage Trump due to his work at DB on Trump's dealings. And clearly if Kennedy's son had knowledge of damaging evidence I think it is reasonable to think he would let his father know not to Trust Trump. If Kennedy was told by his son not to trust Trump, I doubt Kennedy would resign, instead staying on the bench adjudicate any Mueller rulings. I guess maybe you could see him stepping down so he would not have to recuse himself thus opening Mueller rulings subject to a potential 4-4 tie. But retiring and allowing Trump to select his successor seems like a draconian way to avoid that outcome.

G1, progressives and socialists are the ones leading this country down a fate like the old USSR and every other economy that has taken up socialism as their banner.

.........like I said the cult is happy, fuck the country.

[CRedskinsRule]

Fairly dismissive comment. Not very useful in a forum about discussions.

But to try a civil response.

I like the general direction of the country under trump. I wish that there was a less abrasive social environment, but in a free speech democracy you should not want or expect group think.
I wish that, rather then each side demonizing and ascribing bad intent to the other, that both sides would look for the rational parts of the other sides positions and work toward a solution that satisfies the substantial majority(70-80%). There are some people on both sides that cant easily be satisfied, and there are some on both sides that should NOT be accomodated, but everyone should have the right to openly discuss their strongly held beliefs. Discussion does not mean physical violence and those on either side who bring violence into civil discourse should be arrested.

Originally Posted by Giantone

.........like I said the cult is happy, fuck the country.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Fairly dismissive comment. Not very useful in a forum about discussions.

But to try a civil response.

I like the general direction of the country under trump. I wish that there was a less abrasive social environment, but in a free speech democracy you should not want or expect group think.
I wish that, rather then each side demonizing and ascribing bad intent to the other, that both sides would look for the rational parts of the other sides positions and work toward a solution that satisfies the substantial majority(70-80%). There are some people on both sides that cant easily be satisfied, and there are some on both sides that should NOT be accomodated, but everyone should have the right to openly discuss their strongly held beliefs. Discussion does not mean physical violence and those on either side who bring violence into civil discourse should be arrested.

LOL, civil ? You're the one talking "violence".Trump campaigned on violence and now the right is not taking the credit for what they started,Do we really need to post the trump campaign video's again tell the crowed he would pay they legal bills for beating the crap out of protesters???Or the video's of his hate on the "FREE PRESS" or maybe his hate on Hillary and a GOLD STAR FAMILY? . You want the left to do what the right won't do and you're
upset becuase they won't ,you're a hypocrite.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Ok. I have read that article several times and still cannot make the conspiracy connection that you two seem to see.



G1, progressives and socialists are the ones leading this country down a fate like the old USSR and every other economy that has taken up socialism as their banner.

Right , not the president/dictator who is single handedly bringing fascism to the United States. I find funny your complaint about the "old USSR" considering who elected trump.I thought the trumplings love putin.