10-19-2009, 04:32 PM | #736 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
It's not cool to speak in third-person, you know.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
Advertisements |
10-19-2009, 04:35 PM | #737 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Are you going to apologize for Snyder?
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
10-19-2009, 04:41 PM | #738 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
You know I take some of that back. Sometimes I get a little overzealous. I don't wish a pox on Snyder's family.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
10-19-2009, 05:00 PM | #739 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Not every QB is going to develop no matter who the coach is. |
|
10-19-2009, 05:02 PM | #740 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
|
10-19-2009, 05:05 PM | #741 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
College is a whole different game. They miss open guys just as much, but they also have receivers that get 10 yards open and literally stand there and wait for the ball and get tackled on the 4 yard line because the safety finally figured out what happened. You don't have the speed, the routes, the necessity to catch in stride, the defensive looks, etc in college nearly the same as you do in the NFL.
|
10-19-2009, 07:03 PM | #742 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
From that point forward, decline set in and things were clearly different. The OL cracked and later broke. The lack of depth at WR really set in when our running game became unproductive. None of these things have the first thing to do with the WCO. It wasn't un-normal decline, or decline related to the expansion of the WCO, and contrary to popular reporting, the run fits did not change in the middle of the season. Campbell has both played in the WCO well and poorly over the last 22 games. He has reached the highest point in his career (Week 7), and the lowest (the 2009 offseason) playing in the same offense. He hasn't been terrible this year, but at age 27, we're getting somewhere close to whatever he's going to be in this offense. Eli Manning is an exception to the rule, as he endured a horrific regular season in his 3rd full year as a starter, but played on a team that lucked into the playoff, and has since raised his level of play. Ultimately, though, the comparison ends there. Eli plays for an organization who--even though they gave up more to get him than we gave for Campbell--never moved to scapegoat him for any offensive issues they might have had. We on the other hand, have systematically sabotaged anything we might have gotten from Campbell at the conclusion of his development through horrendous personnel decisions and complete mis-management. What I said in the offseason still rings true: if this organization can't win with Campbell, then they can't win without him. Major organizational changes will be necessary to ever have an offense that can produce points consistently, and that means that whoever is building the 2010 team cannot worry about who the QB of the team is. Campbell or anyone else. Too many other pressing issues: offensive and defensive, must be taken care of first.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
10-19-2009, 07:52 PM | #743 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 45
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
|
10-19-2009, 07:54 PM | #744 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Your words, not mine.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
10-19-2009, 08:01 PM | #745 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 45
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
|
10-19-2009, 08:04 PM | #746 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I'm going to miss having you around. Stay in touch.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
10-19-2009, 08:34 PM | #747 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 45
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
10-19-2009, 08:36 PM | #748 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
In the context of dispelling a ridiculous criticism, yes. Not comparing him to them but if you're going to criticize, at least be accurate in your criticism.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
10-19-2009, 09:17 PM | #749 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 121
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
You have to, the numbers are there, and these QBs have been in the same Offense for years. JC's 5th year in the league and he has had 3 different Offenses to learn. Name one of those Qbs that has changed offenses in the last four seasons.
|
10-19-2009, 09:37 PM | #750 | |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
The different system excuse is old,please let it go.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
|
|
|