Trade deadline approaching...

[sdskinsfan2001]

Would you trade Sweat for a good starting OT? I would. That is the type of trade we should be looking for, either by current player or high draft choice in 2024.

I don't think anyone is advocating making a trade just for the sake of making a trade.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Would you trade Sweat for a good starting OT? I would. That is the type of trade we should be looking for, either by current player or high draft choice in 2024.

I don't think anyone is advocating making a trade just for the sake of making a trade.

I would prefer to trade Sweat or Young for draft picks and have enough capital to trade up for the best OT or a QB (which may not be out of a question with a whole new regime coming in).

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I would prefer to trade Sweat or Young for draft picks and have enough capital to trade up for the best OT or a QB (which may not be out of a question with a whole new regime coming in).

There are some good OT's in this draft. The guys from Penn State and Notre Dame come to mind just off of the top of my head.

[SFREDSKIN]

Since DE’s don’t grow on trees, I would sign both, trade Payne next year for a high 1st, draft OL, MLB and another DT.

[Meks]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Since DE’s don’t grow on trees, I would sign both, trade Payne next year for a high 1st, draft OL, MLB and another DT.

I feel like I've been seeing the opposite, at least the last few drafts / seasons with how many pretty good to high level edge rushers come out in April or have been emerging after a year or 2 in the league.

I'd be fine with trading either, as long as there is no fleecing involved

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Meks

I feel like I've been seeing the opposite, at least the last few drafts / seasons with how many pretty good to high level edge rushers come out in April or have been emerging after a year or 2 in the league.

I'd be fine with trading either, as long as there is no fleecing involved

If you can draft a stud MLB, it makes easier on DT’s and hopefully Mathis or
a new drafted DT can fill him.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

There are some good OT's in this draft. The guys from Penn State and Notre Dame come to mind just off of the top of my head.

Someone been mocking! Lol

[Meks]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If you can draft a stud MLB, it makes easier on DT’s and hopefully Mathis or
a new drafted DT can fill him.

What used to be big IFs can hopefully be picks that go in our favor going forward

[calia]

Don’t trust the current regime to do a sensible trade so please leave it alone. Plus, while CY and Sweat may not be all pros, they’re legit starters and even 1st and 2nd round picks are not guarantees to be that (too many examples from our history to name). I like stockpiling picks to hedge the inherent uncertainty of the draft, but not by trading players that are producing. I’d rather trade down for more picks or unload guys who don’t fit scheme than part with productive players.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BaltimoreSkins]

I do not have a subscription to Bullock's film room but whenever I see snippets or hear his analysis in interviews I like his breakdown. A little read about the evolution of Chase Young at the top: https://www.hogshaven.com/2023/10/26...ded-not-traded

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Since DE’s don’t grow on trees, I would sign both, trade Payne next year for a high 1st, draft OL, MLB and another DT.

I don't think they can get a high first for Payne. That would be awesome if they could but interior DL value can be had beyond the first so I don't see a club parting with that pick.

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Would you trade Sweat for a good starting OT? I would. That is the type of trade we should be looking for, either by current player or high draft choice in 2024.

I don't think anyone is advocating making a trade just for the sake of making a trade.

For me only if it is a good starting LT

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

I don't think they can get a high first for Payne. That would be awesome if they could but interior DL value can be had beyond the first so I don't see a club parting with that pick.

When you pay someone like Payne and Hargrave over $90 mil they better be worth a 1st. Payne has playing well and would hate to lose him, but would rather have proven DE’s. SF traded Buckner for a high 1st (top 10).

[Chief X_Phackter]

No team is going to give up a good starting LT for a DE.

[NC_Skins]

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...me-sources-say

It shouldn't hinge on this game. Our season is done for and anybody else holding onto hope is just deluding themselves. It's obvious these players have not bought into this coaching staff. Plainly obvious.

If I were the owner, I would probably green-light Sweat/Chase being shipped off for picks or needed OL. I seriously doubt we get much in return. Hell, at this point, Sweat will net us more in return than for Chase. We aren't signing either one next year so why not get something in return.

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Would you trade Sweat for a good starting OT? I would. That is the type of trade we should be looking for, either by current player or high draft choice in 2024.

I don't think anyone is advocating making a trade just for the sake of making a trade.

Abso-fucking-lutely I would.